Credit Suisse Group AG Chairman Axel Lehmann apologized to shareholders for failing to stem a loss of trust in the bank that he said had built up well before he took over.
(Bloomberg) — Credit Suisse Group AG Chairman Axel Lehmann apologized to shareholders for failing to stem a loss of trust in the bank that he said had built up well before he took over.
“We failed to stem the impact of legacy scandals, and counter negative headlines with positive facts,” Lehmann said in remarks prepared for the firm’s annual shareholder meeting in Zurich. In the end, “the bank could not be saved.”
The mea culpa comes as shareholders confront leadership over the historic takeover by larger rival UBS Group AG that marks the end of Credit Suisse after 167 years. The 3 billion-franc ($3.3 billion) deal was sealed last month to put an end to a crisis of confidence after years or scandals, losses and failures in risk management. Fragile investor sentiment around banking was further hurt by the failure of Silicon Valley Bank.
The shareholder meeting is the first occasion in years where investors are be able to confront management face-to-face. Previous meetings were held virtually due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Here’s the latest. All times are Zurich local time:
Proxy adviser sees chance to attack deal (11:21 a.m.)
Vincent Kaufmann, Ethos CEO, says he believes that compensation was a reason CS staff took risks. He says he believes, even if chances are slim, shareholders can still attack the deal under a specific article.
“It is your duty in fact as members of the board to recognize the responsibility that you and previous leadership have for this entire disaster. We have plenty of questions we have sent to the board and we expect an answer. What is the financial basis and the basis of which dates was the merger bid agreed? Was there a fairness opinion? How has the board assured the limit of the damage to the shareholders?”
Shareholder feels cheated (11:15 a.m.)
“Political masters have been dozing on the job for the last 15 years,” said Guido Röthlisberger, a shareholder. “The government should have been keeping a better eye on what was going on and making sure the rules were being followed.”
“Ms. Keller-Sutter was completely out of her depth, I think, in her role in dealing with the banking crisis,” he said. “I think it was possible to do this deal without an emergency decree, we had an AGM, and I feel I have been cheated. “
CEO Korner says ‘we ran out of time’ (10:30 a.m.)
“The collapse of Credit Suisse would have been catastrophic not just for Switzerland but for the global economy,” Chief Executive Officer Ulrich Koerner said in the text of his speech. “We no longer had a choice.”
Shareholders and proxy advisers indicated prior to the meeting their intention to vote against the reelection of several board members including Lehmann and expressed discontent with the board of directors and management’s leadership of the bank. It’s still unclear which of the failed bank’s top executives will survive the takeover, with Lehmann and Koerner seen exiting.
“We ran out of time,” Koerner said about the failure to save Credit Suisse. “What has happened over the past few weeks will continue to affect me personally and many others for a long time to come.”
Lehmann says ‘I am truly sorry’ (10:30 a.m.)
“We wanted to put all our energy and our efforts into turning the situation around and putting the bank back on track,” Lehmann told the audience in Zurich’s hockey stadium. “It pains me that we didn’t have the time to do so, and that in that fateful week in March our plans were disrupted. For that I am truly sorry.”
His apology was met with half-hearted applause by an audience that included many former Credit Suisse employees, as well as a few “boos.”
The deal was agreed without the approval of either Credit Suisse or UBS’s shareholders, underscoring the urgency for the Swiss government to orchestrate a solution. In announcing the acquisition, it cited an article of the constitution that allows it to issue temporary ordinances “to counter existing or imminent threats of serious disruption to public order or internal or external security.” In this case, this included overriding merger laws on shareholder votes.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
©2023 Bloomberg L.P.