Foreign NGOs say new Israeli rules keep them from delivering Gaza aid

New Israeli legislation regulating foreign aid groups has increasingly been used to deny their requests to bring supplies into Gaza, a joint letter signed by more than 100 groups said Thursday.Ties between foreign-backed aid groups and the Israeli government have long been tense, with Israeli officials often complaining that the organisations are biased. Those rocky relations have become even more strained since Hamas’s October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. “Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are ‘not authorised to deliver aid’,” the aid groups said.COGAT, the Israeli defence ministry body overseeing civil affairs in the Palestinian territories, rejected what it called “false claims” made by the organisations. According to the joint letter, whose signatories include Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders (MSF), at least 60 requests to bring aid into Gaza were rejected in July alone.UK-based Oxfam said that $2.5 million worth of its supplies, including food, were barred from entering Gaza, while another charity, CARE, said it had not been authorised to bring in aid since March.Another signatory, Anera, said it had over seven million dollars’ worth of supplies, including enough rice for six million meals, waiting just outside Gaza in the Israeli port city of Ashdod.But COGAT denied Israel was blocking supplies.”Israel acts to allow and facilitate the entry of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, while Hamas seeks to exploit the aid to strengthen its military capabilities and consolidate its control over the population,” it wrote on X.”This is sometimes done under the cover of certain international aid organisations, whether knowingly or unknowingly,” added COGAT, which said that close to 380 trucks had entered the Gaza Strip on Wednesday.- ‘Hostile activity’ -But Amjad Al-Shawa, head of the Palestinian NGOs Network in Gaza, told AFP that Israel “continues to prevent international NGOs from bringing their trucks” into the territory.”The number of trucks entering Gaza (each day) is only between 70 and 90 at best,” he said.In March, the Israeli government approved a new set of rules for foreign non-governmental organisations working with Palestinians.The law updates the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel.Registration can be refused if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the democratic character of Israel or “promotes delegitimisation campaigns” against the country.”Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity,” said Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli, whose ministry has been put in charge of NGO registrations.”Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate,” he added.- Deadly distributions -The aid groups complained that the new rules were leaving Gazans without life-saving assistance.”Today, international NGOs’ fears have proven true: the registration system is now being used to further block aid and deny food and medicine in the midst of the worst-case scenario of famine”, their joint letter concluded.”Our mandate is to save lives but due to the registration restrictions, civilians are being left without the food, medicine and protection they urgently need,” said Jolien Veldwijk, Palestinian territories director for CARE.Israel has long accused Hamas of diverting aid entering the territory under the UN-led distribution system.Since May, it has distributed aid through the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an organisation that is boycotted by the UN and other aid groups over accusations it serves Israeli military objectives.According to Gaza’s civil defence agency, the GHF’s operations have been frequently marred by chaos as thousands of Gazans have scrambled daily to approach its hubs, where some have been shot, including by Israeli soldiers.In late July, the United Nations reported that at least 1,373 Palestinians had been killed in Gaza since May 27 while waiting or searching for aid.International NGOs now fear they could be barred from operating in Israel and the Palestinian territories altogether if they do not submit sensitive information about their Palestinian staff to the Israeli government.The deadline for information submission is in September, at which point “many could be forced to halt operations in Gaza and the West Bank, including east Jerusalem, and remove all international staff within 60 days.”

India and China eye resumption of border trade

India and China are discussing resuming border trade five years after it was halted, foreign ministry officials on both sides have said, as US tariffs disrupt the global trade order.Past trade between the neighbours across the icy and high-altitude Himalayan border passes was usually small in volume, but any resumption is significant for its symbolism.The two major economic powers have long competed for strategic influence across South Asia.However, the two countries, caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump’s tariff regime, have moved to mend ties.Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected for talks in New Delhi on Monday, according to Indian media, after his counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar visited Beijing in July.That, as well as agreements to resume direct flights and issue tourist visas, has been seen as an effort to rebuild a relationship damaged after a deadly 2020 border clash between troops. “For a long time, China–India border trade cooperation has played an important role in improving the lives of people living along the border,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement sent to AFP on Thursday.It said the two sides have “reached a consensus on cross-border exchanges and cooperation, including resumption of border trade”.New Delhi’s junior foreign minister, Kirti Vardhan Singh, told parliament last week that “India has engaged with the Chinese side to facilitate the resumption of border trade”.No restart date was given by either side.- ‘Transitions and challenges’ -Successive US administrations have seen India as a longstanding ally with like-minded interests when it comes to China.India is part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, as well as Australia and Japan.However, ties between New Delhi and Washington have been strained by Trump’s ultimatum for India to end its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow as it wages its military offensive in Ukraine.The United States will double new import tariffs on India from 25 percent to 50 percent by August 27 if New Delhi does not switch crude suppliers.Indian foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told reporters on Thursday that the partnership between New Delhi and Washington had “weathered several transitions and challenges”.Jaiswal said India hoped that the “relationship will continue to move forward based on mutual respect and shared interests”.He said India “stands ready” to support the efforts to end the Ukraine war and endorses the summit to be held between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to Indian media, might also visit China in late August. It would be Modi’s first visit since 2018, although it has not been confirmed officially.Beijing has said that “China welcomes Prime Minister Modi” for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit opening on August 31.burs-bb/pjm/pbt

India and China eye resumption of border trade

India and China are discussing resuming border trade five years after it was halted, foreign ministry officials on both sides have said, as US tariffs disrupt the global trade order.Past trade between the neighbours across the icy and high-altitude Himalayan border passes was usually small in volume, but any resumption is significant for its symbolism.The two major economic powers have long competed for strategic influence across South Asia.However, the two countries, caught in global trade and geopolitical turbulence triggered by US President Donald Trump’s tariff regime, have moved to mend ties.Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is expected for talks in New Delhi on Monday, according to Indian media, after his counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar visited Beijing in July.That, as well as agreements to resume direct flights and issue tourist visas, has been seen as an effort to rebuild a relationship damaged after a deadly 2020 border clash between troops. “For a long time, China–India border trade cooperation has played an important role in improving the lives of people living along the border,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement sent to AFP on Thursday.It said the two sides have “reached a consensus on cross-border exchanges and cooperation, including resumption of border trade”.New Delhi’s junior foreign minister, Kirti Vardhan Singh, told parliament last week that “India has engaged with the Chinese side to facilitate the resumption of border trade”.No restart date was given by either side.- ‘Transitions and challenges’ -Successive US administrations have seen India as a longstanding ally with like-minded interests when it comes to China.India is part of the Quad security alliance with the United States, as well as Australia and Japan.However, ties between New Delhi and Washington have been strained by Trump’s ultimatum for India to end its purchases of Russian oil, a key source of revenue for Moscow as it wages its military offensive in Ukraine.The United States will double new import tariffs on India from 25 percent to 50 percent by August 27 if New Delhi does not switch crude suppliers.Indian foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told reporters on Thursday that the partnership between New Delhi and Washington had “weathered several transitions and challenges”.Jaiswal said India hoped that the “relationship will continue to move forward based on mutual respect and shared interests”.He said India “stands ready” to support the efforts to end the Ukraine war and endorses the summit to be held between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.Prime Minister Narendra Modi, according to Indian media, might also visit China in late August. It would be Modi’s first visit since 2018, although it has not been confirmed officially.Beijing has said that “China welcomes Prime Minister Modi” for the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit opening on August 31.burs-bb/pjm/pbt

‘Its a microphone’: Nairobi slum pageant gives platform to voicelessThu, 14 Aug 2025 12:51:57 GMT

A stone’s throw from Kenya’s largest informal settlement, a young woman glides down a spotlit catwalk, her delicate white dress at odds with the fake blood splattered across it and the tape covering her lips reading: “Stop, silence, gender-based violence”.The annual “Mr and Ms Kibera” pageant in Nairobi, gleefully attended by hundreds, is about more …

‘Its a microphone’: Nairobi slum pageant gives platform to voicelessThu, 14 Aug 2025 12:51:57 GMT Read More »

Trump on Putin: from flattery to frustration

In the early days of his second term, US President Donald Trump was full of praise for his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, who he meets Friday in Alaska for crunch talks on the Ukraine conflict.But as the months have passed without the peace deal Trump said would be done in 24 hours under his leadership, his tone on Putin has turned sour.Here a look back in quotes at the shifting mood:- ‘I get along with him great’ -Ending the war in Ukraine was a priority for Trump in January when he returned to the Oval Office. “I think he’s destroying Russia by not making a deal,” he told reporters on January 20, while also insisting, “I got along with him great.”A day later on Truth Social he posted:”I’m going to do Russia, whose Economy is failing, and President Putin, a very big FAVOR. Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous War! IT’S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE.”Meanwhile from the Kremlin Putin was flattering, telling Russian state media on January 24 that Trump was “not only a smart person, but a pragmatic person”. He also said what he referred to as the “crisis in Ukraine” might have been averted had Donald Trump been US president at the time.”I cannot but agree with him that if he had been president — if his victory hadn’t been stolen in 2020 — then maybe there would not have been the crisis in Ukraine that emerged in 2022.”- ‘Vladimir, STOP!’ -Good vibes seemed to circulate between the two leaders the following month.Trump described their phone conversation on February 12 as “lengthy and highly productive”.”President Putin even used my very strong Campaign motto of, ‘COMMON SENSE.’ We both believe very strongly in it,” he posted on Truth Social.But his tone changed sharply at the end of March.Trump told NBC he was “very angry, very pissed off” when Putin started getting into Ukraine leader Volodymyr Zelensky’s credibility. Then in April, Trump called on Putin to stop strikes on Kyiv. “Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!” he posted on April 24.He continued in this spirit two days later.”It makes me think that maybe he doesn’t want to stop the war, he’s just tapping me along, and has to be dealt with differently, through ‘Banking’ or ‘Secondary Sanctions?’ Too many people are dying!!!”- ‘He’s gone absolutely CRAZY!’ -By late May, exasperation was taking over. “I’ve always had a very good relationship with Vladimir Putin of Russia, but something has happened to him. He has gone absolutely CRAZY!” he posted on May 25. “What Vladimir Putin doesn’t realize is that if it weren’t for me, lots of really bad things would have already happened to Russia, and I mean REALLY BAD,” Trump posted a day later. “He’s playing with fire!”But when Trump turned 79 on June 14, Putin did not forget to send his best wishes.”President Putin called this morning to very nicely wish me a Happy Birthday,” Trump posted, adding that the call was to “more importantly, talk about Iran.”It was a brief thaw.”We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin if you want to know the truth. He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless,” Trump said at the White House on July 8.”I thought he was somebody that meant what he said. And he’ll talk so beautifully and then he’ll bomb people at night,” he told reporters a week later.By the end of July, Trump said he was “not so interested” in talking to Putin anymore.But days before Friday’s summit in Alaska he said he expected to have a “constructive conversation” with his Russian counterpart.

Des ONG dénoncent une législation israélienne les empêchant d’intervenir à Gaza

Une législation israélienne réglementant les ONG étrangères a été de plus en plus utilisée pour refuser leurs demandes d’apporter de l’aide dans la bande de Gaza, selon une lettre signée par plus de cent ONG publiée jeudi.Les relations entre les ONG soutenues par l’étranger et le gouvernement israélien ont longtemps été marquées par des tensions, les autorités accusant souvent ces ONG de partialité. Ces rapports difficiles se sont encore tendus après l’attaque du Hamas contre Israël qui a déclenché la guerre en octobre 2023.”Les autorités israéliennes ont rejeté les demandes de dizaines d’ONG pour apporter des biens de première nécessité (à Gaza), affirmant que ces organisations +ne sont pas autorisées à fournir de l’aide+”, indique la déclaration.Le Cogat, un organisme israélien en charge des Affaires civiles, a rejeté des “allégations mensongères”.”Israël agit pour permettre et faciliter l’entrée de l’aide humanitaire dans la bande de Gaza, tandis que le Hamas cherche à exploiter cette aide pour renforcer ses capacités militaires et consolider son contrôle sur la population. Cela se fait parfois sous couvert de certaines organisations d’aide internationale, que ce soit sciemment ou non”, assure le Cogat, selon lequel 380 camions sont entrés mercredi dans Gaza par les accès de Kerem Shalom et Zikim.Le directeur du réseau des ONG palestiniennes à Gaza, Amjad Al-Shawa, a au contraire affirmé à l’AFP que “le nombre de camions entrant dans Gaza (chaque jour) est seulement compris entre 70 et 90 au mieux”. Israël “continue d’empêcher les ONG internationales d’y faire rentrer leurs camions”, a-t-il ajouté. – “Millions de dollars” en attente -Selon la lettre, signée notamment d’Oxfam et Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), au moins 60 demandes d’aide pour le territoire palestinien assiégé ont été rejetées en juillet.Elle cite l’exemple de l’ONG Anera qui “dispose de plus de 7 millions de dollars de fournitures vitales prêtes à entrer à Gaza, y compris 744 tonnes de riz, suffisantes pour six millions de repas, bloquées à Ashdod (Israël) à seulement quelques kilomètres” de Gaza.Idem pour Care et Oxfam, dans l’impossibilité de livrer respectivement pour 1,5 million de dollars et 2,5 millions de dollars de diverses fournitures.Le gouvernement israélien a approuvé en mars un nouvel ensemble de règles encadrant les ONG étrangères qui travaillent avec les Palestiniens.Leur enregistrement peut être refusé si les autorités estiment qu’un groupe nie le caractère démocratique d’Israël ou “promeut des campagnes de délégitimation” contre le pays.”Malheureusement, de nombreuses organisations d’aide servent de couverture pour des activités hostiles et parfois violentes”, a déclaré à l’AFP le ministre de la Diaspora Amichai Chikli, dont le ministère a été chargé de l’enregistrement des ONG.Les organisations “n’ayant aucun lien avec des activités hostiles ou violentes et aucune connexion avec le mouvement de boycott se verront accorder l’autorisation d’opérer”, a-t-il ajouté.- “Sauver des vies” -Les ONG affirment que ces nouvelles règles laissent les Palestiniens à Gaza sans aide.”Notre mandat est de sauver des vies, mais en raison des restrictions liées à l’enregistrement, les civils se retrouvent sans la nourriture, ni les médicaments et la protection dont ils ont un besoin urgent”, a déclaré Jolien Veldwijk, directeur de Care dans les Territoires palestiniens.”Le système d’enregistrement est désormais utilisé pour bloquer davantage l’aide et refuser nourriture et médicaments au milieu du pire scénario possible de famine”, accuse la lettre.Israël accuse le Hamas de détourner l’aide entrant à Gaza, et depuis mai, le gouvernement s’appuie sur la Fondation humanitaire de Gaza (GHF) soutenue par les Etats-Unis pour gérer les centres de distribution alimentaireCes opérations se déroulent souvent dans le plus grand désordre, voire le chaos, et sous les tirs israéliens pour tenter d’y contrôler les foules.Au moins 1.373 Palestiniens ont été tués à Gaza depuis le 27 mai, la plupart par des tirs israéliens, “alors qu’ils cherchaient de la nourriture”, avait rapporté fin juillet l’ONU.Des ONG étrangères et l’ONU ont refusé de coopérer avec la GHF, qu’elles accusent de servir les besoins militaires d’Israël. Surtout, ces ONG redoutent d’être interdites d’activité en Israël et dans les Territoires palestiniens si elles ne transmettent pas au gouvernement israélien des informations sensibles sur leur personnel palestinien. La date limite pour soumettre ces données est fixée à septembre, après quoi “nombre d’entre elles pourraient être contraintes de cesser leurs opérations à Gaza et en Cisjordanie, y compris à Jérusalem-Est, et de retirer tout leur personnel international sous 60 jours”.

UN commission finds violence against Syria Alawites likely included ‘war crimes’

A UN commission investigating sectarian bloodshed in Syria’s Alawite heartland documented systematic violence at the hands of government forces and allied groups, warning Thursday that some of the acts could constitute war crimes.The violence in March unfolded along Syria’s predominantly Alawite Mediterranean coast, where security personnel and their allies were accused of carrying out summary executions, mostly targeting civilians from the religious minority, with a war monitor saying more than 1,700 people were killed.The Syrian foreign ministry said it was committed to “incorporating the (commission’s) recommendations into the ongoing process of institution-building” and of consolidating the rule of law.The UN commission said in its report on Thursday that the violence committed by “members of the interim government forces and private individuals operating alongside or in proximity to them… followed a systematic pattern across multiple, widespread locations”.”The violations included acts that likely amount to war crimes,” it said. The commission documented cases of “murder, torture and inhumane acts related to the treatment of the dead, widespread looting and burning of homes all of which displaced tens of thousands of civilians”.Syria’s new authorities have accused gunmen loyal to ousted ruler Bashar al-Assad of instigating the violence by launching deadly attacks that killed dozens of security personnel. The UN commission also found that pro-Assad forces were implicated in the violence.- ‘Deeply disturbing’ -Human rights groups and international organisations have said entire families were killed, including women, children and the elderly.Gunmen stormed homes and asked residents whether they were Alawite or Sunni before killing or sparing them, they said.The UN commission documented similar cases involving the killing of Alawite men.During his rule, Assad — himself an Alawite — cultivated an image as a defender of minorities, even as his authoritarian tendencies plunged the country into civil war.Since his December ouster at the hands of Islamist-led rebels, the violence on the coast and in south Syria’s Druze heartland have raised questions about the new authorities’ ability to provide security and manage sectarian tensions.The UN commission — which said it had been granted “unfettered access” to the area by the post-Assad government — based its findings on more than 200 interviews with victims and witnesses.It said there were “reasonable grounds to believe” that members of the security forces and other private individuals engaged in “serious violations of international human rights law”.”The scale and brutality of the violence documented in our report is deeply disturbing,” said commission chair Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, urging accountability and expanded efforts to arrest perpetrators. – ‘Serious note’ -The commission said it “continues to receive information about ongoing violations in many of the affected areas, including abductions of women, arbitrary arrests and enforced disappearances”.It said it had “found no evidence of a governmental policy or plan” to carry out the attacks, though their systematic nature “in certain locations may be indicative of an organisational policy within certain factions or groups”.In a letter to the commission, Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani said the government took “serious note of the alleged violations”, saying they “appear to be consistent with the findings” of the Syrian inquiry.US envoy for Syria Thomas Barrack called the report “a serious step towards definable and traceable metrics to the Syrian government’s responsibility, transparency and accountability”. The commission said it was also investigating recent violence in Syria’s Druze-majority Sweida province that it said highlighted the urgency of implementing the report’s recommendations.In its own inquiry, the committee formed by the Syrian authorities documented “serious violations against civilians” in March.The committee confirmed “the names of 1,426 dead, including 90 women”, and identified “298 individuals by name” who were suspected of involvement in the violations.

Pollution plastique: quelques heures pour un impossible traité

Les diplomates de 184 pays n’ont plus que quelques heures jeudi à Genève pour tenter de forger à l’arrachée un texte commun qui établirait un premier traité international de lutte contre la pollution plastique, après le rejet massif d’un projet de texte de synthèse.Une nouvelle séance plénière réunissant tous les délégués est prévue en milieu d’après midi, après l’échec retentissant d’une tentative de synthèse maladroite mercredi après-midi, et des débats d’une grande confusion.Mais les chances de trouver un accord, après trois ans de négociations, semblent très minces, étant donné les profondes divisions qui demeurent entre les deux camps qui se sont affrontés sur le sujet.D’un côté, un groupe de pays majoritaire dit “ambitieux”, dont l’Union européenne, le Canada, l’Australie, beaucoup de pays d’Amerique latine, d’Afrique et d’îles, désireux de nettoyer la planète du plastique qui commence à la gangréner et affecte la santé humaine.De l’autre, un groupe de pays essentiellement pétroliers, qui refusent toute contrainte sur la production de plastique et toute interdiction de molécules ou additifs dangereux.Pour la coalition dite de grande ambition, le texte présenté mercredi était un document vide de toute ambition, sans obligation aucune sur les pays, ni sur leur volume de production de plastique ni sur l’élimination des produits chimiques problématiques. Il s’agissait uniquement d’un accord portant sur la gestion et l’élimination des déchets plastique déjà existants.Pour le camp d’en face, surnommé “ceux qui pensent la même chose”, mené par l’Arabie saoudite et les États du Golfe, le texte dépassait plusieurs de leurs “lignes rouges”, et surtout ne définissait pas de “scope” c’est-à-dire de champs d’action exact pour le texte.La fin des pourparlers est prévue jeudi à minuit et pourrait déborder dans la nuit si les diplomates étaient en mesure de présenter encore un nouveau texte remanié d’ici là.Poussés par une résolution des Nations unies de 2022, cela fait près de trois ans qu’ils tentent de forger un texte “juridiquement contraignant” pour les États qui s’attaque à la pollution plastique, y compris en milieu marin. Mais sous l’œil des représentants des industries pétrochimiques présents dans les couloirs et opposés à toute coercition, ils ont déjà échoué une fois à produire un texte commun lors de la dernière séquence de négociations, à Busan en Corée du Sud fin 2024.- Moins de 10% recyclé -Cette nouvelle séquence diplomatique, entamée à Genève le 5 août, était censée permettre d’aboutir enfin à un texte commun.Le sujet est d’autant plus important que la planète a produit plus de plastique depuis 2000 que durant les 50 ans précédents, en majorité des produits à usage unique et des emballages et la tendance s’accélère: si rien n’est fait, la production actuelle, de quelque 450 millions de tonnes par an, devrait tripler d’ici 2060, selon les prévisions de l’OCDE. Or moins de 10% est recyclé.Jeudi matin, des réunions régionales ont eu lieu, ainsi que des réunions des groupes coalisés.Pour Aleksandar Rankovic du groupe de réflexion The Common Initiative, le texte présenté mercredi a supprimé tous les points favorables aux ambitieux et a ôté de ce fait aux pays leur pouvoir de négociation.”Il reste deux scénarios: il y a le mauvais et le très mauvais, et beaucoup de choses pas très belles entre entre les deux” a-t-il dit à l’AFP.”Le mauvais scenario, c’est si les pays adoptent un mauvais traité, un texte comme celui qui a été présenté mercredi”.”Le très mauvais scénario, c’est s’ils ne sont d’accord sur rien, et s’ils prévoient de se réunir de nouveau pour trouver encore une nouvelle synthèse, ou si le texte reste à l’abandon pendant longtemps et soit pratiquement abandonné”.Pour le WWF, les pays ambitieux “ont désormais reconnu qu’il n’y avait aucun texte possible qui soit acceptable par tous les membres de l’ONU”.Leurs ministres ont désormais la possibilité d’avancer “leur propre texte” a indiqué Zaynab Sadan, cheffe de la délégation plastique de l’ONG environnementale WWF. “Ils doivent se préparer à faire adopter leur texte par vote. Il n’y a aucun autre moyen d’obtenir un traité qui ait du sens” a-t-elle estimé.Le ministre suisse chargé de l’Environnement, Albert Rösti a estimé pour sa part auprès de l’agence ATS qu’une absence de résultats dans les pourparlers de Genève serait “une fin grave” et “inacceptable”.La Suisse, pays hôte des négociations, souhaite désormais un texte recentré sur trois grandes questions: une amélioration de la production, sans objectif de réduction, une diminution ou au moins une surveillance des produits plastiques problématiques et un mécanisme de financement pour les pays en développement doivent figurer dans un accord.