Menendez brothers face parole board seeking freedom after parents murders

Lyle and Erik Menendez will appear before California’s parole board to seek freedom this week, more than 35 years after the shotgun murders of their parents in the family’s luxury Beverly Hills home.The separate hearings — Erik on Thursday, Lyle on Friday — are the latest chapter in a long campaign waged by friends, family and celebrities like Kim Kardashian to get the brothers out of prison.They come after a Los Angeles judge this year reduced their original open-ended sentence to a term of 50 years, and as the men said, they accepted full responsibility for the grisly 1989 killings.Now the brothers will be seeking to convince parole panels that they are reformed and pose no danger to the public.”For more than 35 years, they have shown sustained growth. They have taken full accountability,” said a statement from The Justice for Erik and Lyle Coalition, a support group that includes family members.”They express sincere remorse to our family to this day and have built a meaningful life defined by purpose and service.”- ‘Mafia hit’ -Blockbuster trials in the 1990s heard how the men killed Jose and Kitty Menendez in what prosecutors said was a cynical attempt to get their hands on a large family fortune.After setting up alibis and trying to cover their tracks, the men shot Jose Menendez five times with shotguns, including in the kneecaps.Kitty Menendez died from a shotgun blast as she tried desperately to crawl away from her killers.The brothers initially blamed the deaths on a mafia hit, but changed their story several times in the ensuing months.Erik, then 18, confessed to the murders in a session with his therapist.The pair ultimately claimed they had acted in self-defense after years of emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of a tyrannical father.During their decades in prison, changing social mores and greater awareness of sexual abuse helped elevate the men to something approaching cultural icons.This status was nourished by a parade of docudramas and TV shows, including the hit Netflix miniseries “Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story.”- ‘Horrific’ -The hearings in Sacramento, which will be closed to the public, are expected to last two to three hours each. One reporter will be present to act as a pool on behalf of the dozens of media outlets around the world which are expected to cover the hearings.Erik, 54, and Lyle, 57, will appear by video link from the San Diego prison where they are being held.Two or three panel members, whose identity is not being publicly released by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), will quiz the men on their behavior and their attitudes towards their crimes.”The hearing panel will consider all relevant, reliable information available to the panel, which includes… criminal history, department records concerning the incarcerated person, and statements from the incarcerated person, victims’ family, the district attorney’s office, and the public,” the CDCR said.Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman opposed resentencing this year, and is expected to oppose parole.He has insisted that the men’s shifting explanations for the double deaths — they gave five different accounts in the course of the murder investigation — means they have not truly admitted their guilt.”The Menendez brothers have never fully accepted responsibility for the horrific murders of their parents,” Hochman said in a statement Wednesday.”Instead continuing to promote a false narrative of self-defense that was rejected by the jury decades ago.”Even if the panel grants parole, the men will not be freed immediately, with the decision subject to review by the board’s top lawyer in a process that can take up to four months.After that, the final decision rests with California Governor Gavin Newsom, who has 30 days in which he “may affirm, reverse, modify, or refer back to the Board any parole grant,” the CDCR says.In 2022, Newsom rejected a parole recommendation in the case of Sirhan Sirhan, who shot and killed Democratic presidential hopeful Robert F. Kennedy in 1968.

Weaponising the feed: Inside Kenya’s online war against activistsThu, 21 Aug 2025 05:22:16 GMT

When software developer Rose Njeri created a pro-democracy tool to help Kenyans object to a contested finance bill, she was thrown in jail and targeted by an online smear campaign.Njeri is the latest victim of a sophisticated online apparatus that targets and harasses government critics in Kenya, where rights groups warn of an escalating crackdown …

Weaponising the feed: Inside Kenya’s online war against activistsThu, 21 Aug 2025 05:22:16 GMT Read More »

Hong Kong: la défense de Jimmy Lai s’exprime lors des plaidoiries finales

La défense du militant prodémocratie Jimmy Lai doit à nouveau s’exprimer jeudi à Hong Kong lors des plaidoiries finales de son procès pour atteinte à la sécurité nationale, après avoir déclaré qu’il était bon de “soutenir la liberté d’expression”.L’homme d’affaires âgé de 77 ans est accusé de collusion avec des forces étrangères et encourt l’emprisonnement à perpétuité.Les autorités affirment que le fondateur du journal Apple Daily, de nationalité britannique, a fait pression sur des gouvernements occidentaux pour qu’ils imposent des sanctions à la Chine et à sa région administrative spéciale de Hong Kong. Jimmy Lai est également accusé d’avoir écrit des textes séditieux dans son journal.Le quotidien Apple Daily a dû fermer en raison de son soutien aux grandes manifestations prodémocratie de 2019 à Hong Kong, parfois violentes, après lesquelles Pékin a mis en place une loi de sécurité nationale dans ce haut-lieu de la finance mondiale – celle qui vaut à l’homme d’affaires d’être poursuivi.Mercredi, lors des plaidoiries finales, l’avocat de M. Lai, Robert Pang, a déclaré à la cour qu’il n’était “pas mauvais de soutenir la liberté d’expression” et les droits humains. “Il n’est pas mauvais d’essayer de persuader le gouvernement de changer sa politique”, a-t-il ajouté.Plus tôt mercredi, le procureur Anthony Chau a jugé que le témoignage de Jimmy Lai, intervenu plus de 50 jours à l’audience, n’était “pas crédible”.Décrire l’Apple Daily comme un “défenseur neutre des valeurs fondamentales de Hong Kong” est “tout à fait trompeur”, a déclaré Anthony Chau à la cour. Jimmy Lai “et l’Apple Daily ont été anticommunistes pendant de nombreuses années”, et le magnat des médias “a glorifié la violence (…) et le martyre contre le régime du (Parti communiste chinois)”, a-t-il affirmé.Il a ajouté que de nombreuses correspondances prouvaient ses liens avec des personnalités politiques occidentales, et un projet pour faire mettre en place des sanctions contre la Chine et Hong Kong lors des manifestations massives de 2019.Des pays occidentaux et organisations de défense des droits humains appellent à la libération de l’homme d’affaires, en détention depuis décembre 2020. La semaine dernière, les plaidoiries finales avaient été reportées en raison de “palpitations” cardiaques chez Jimmy Lai.

Hong Kong: la défense de Jimmy Lai s’exprime lors des plaidoiries finales

La défense du militant prodémocratie Jimmy Lai doit à nouveau s’exprimer jeudi à Hong Kong lors des plaidoiries finales de son procès pour atteinte à la sécurité nationale, après avoir déclaré qu’il était bon de “soutenir la liberté d’expression”.L’homme d’affaires âgé de 77 ans est accusé de collusion avec des forces étrangères et encourt l’emprisonnement à perpétuité.Les autorités affirment que le fondateur du journal Apple Daily, de nationalité britannique, a fait pression sur des gouvernements occidentaux pour qu’ils imposent des sanctions à la Chine et à sa région administrative spéciale de Hong Kong. Jimmy Lai est également accusé d’avoir écrit des textes séditieux dans son journal.Le quotidien Apple Daily a dû fermer en raison de son soutien aux grandes manifestations prodémocratie de 2019 à Hong Kong, parfois violentes, après lesquelles Pékin a mis en place une loi de sécurité nationale dans ce haut-lieu de la finance mondiale – celle qui vaut à l’homme d’affaires d’être poursuivi.Mercredi, lors des plaidoiries finales, l’avocat de M. Lai, Robert Pang, a déclaré à la cour qu’il n’était “pas mauvais de soutenir la liberté d’expression” et les droits humains. “Il n’est pas mauvais d’essayer de persuader le gouvernement de changer sa politique”, a-t-il ajouté.Plus tôt mercredi, le procureur Anthony Chau a jugé que le témoignage de Jimmy Lai, intervenu plus de 50 jours à l’audience, n’était “pas crédible”.Décrire l’Apple Daily comme un “défenseur neutre des valeurs fondamentales de Hong Kong” est “tout à fait trompeur”, a déclaré Anthony Chau à la cour. Jimmy Lai “et l’Apple Daily ont été anticommunistes pendant de nombreuses années”, et le magnat des médias “a glorifié la violence (…) et le martyre contre le régime du (Parti communiste chinois)”, a-t-il affirmé.Il a ajouté que de nombreuses correspondances prouvaient ses liens avec des personnalités politiques occidentales, et un projet pour faire mettre en place des sanctions contre la Chine et Hong Kong lors des manifestations massives de 2019.Des pays occidentaux et organisations de défense des droits humains appellent à la libération de l’homme d’affaires, en détention depuis décembre 2020. La semaine dernière, les plaidoiries finales avaient été reportées en raison de “palpitations” cardiaques chez Jimmy Lai.

Africa could become ‘renewable superpower’, says GuterresThu, 21 Aug 2025 05:12:13 GMT

Africa has everything it takes to become a “renewable superpower”, UN head Antonio Guterres said Thursday, as he called for greater investment in green energy across the resource-rich continent.Guterres spoke at a three-day development conference in Japan attended by African leaders, where Tokyo is offering itself as an alternative to China as African nations reel …

Africa could become ‘renewable superpower’, says GuterresThu, 21 Aug 2025 05:12:13 GMT Read More »

US intel chief slashes payroll to root out ‘deep state actors’

US intelligence chief Tulsi Gabbard said Wednesday she will make heavy cuts to her office, which she declared has “fallen short” of fulfilling its mandate and is “rife with abuse of power.”Gabbard announced she will reduce the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) by over 40 percent by the end of fiscal year 2025, estimated to save $700 million.”Over the last 20 years, ODNI has become bloated and inefficient, and the intelligence community is rife with abuse of power, unauthorized leaks of classified intelligence and politicized weaponization of intelligence,” Gabbard said in a news release.In a series of social media posts, Gabbard added that she is “cutting bloated bureaucracy, rooting out deep state actors, and restoring mission focus.”A four-page fact sheet posted to her department’s website describes the plan for “ODNI 2.0,” which involves reducing her office’s efforts to monitor biosecurity, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, cyber intelligence threats and other areas.In explaining cuts to the Strategic Futures Group, the office’s intelligence forecasting unit, Gabbard’s team said they were “found to violate professional analytic tradecraft standards in an effort to propogate a political agenda that ran counter to all of the current president’s national security priorities.”The cuts were, at times, explained with accusations against previous Democrat-led administrations.Cuts to the Foreign Malign Influence Center — established to combat foreign threats to democracy and US interests — were conducted because it was “used by the previous administration to justify the suppression of free speech and to censor political opposition,” the fact sheet alleged, in reference to President Donald Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden.The fact sheet also touted previous cuts, saying since “Gabbard’s first day, ODNI has already reduced its size by nearly 30%, with more than 500 staffers now off the books.”In July, Gabbard accused former president Barack Obama of heading a “treasonous conspiracy” to allege Russia interfered with American elections to help Trump.But Gabbard’s findings run up against four separate criminal, counterintelligence and watchdog probes between 2019 and 2023 — each of them concluding that Russia did interfere and helped Trump in various ways.Critics have accused Gabbard, 43, of being close to Russian President Vladimir Putin and ousted Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. The purge extends beyond slashing the agency’s current payroll. The New York Times reported Tuesday that Gabbard revoked the security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials — many of whom worked on Russia analysis or foreign threats to US elections — at the president’s direction. President Donald Trump took office on the promise of reducing the size of the federal government, and has since slashed US foreign aid contributions, the Department of Education — which required the US Supreme Court’s approval — and other agencies.