French court to rule on Assad immunity in chemical attack case

France’s highest court is to decide Friday whether to uphold an arrest warrant against Syria’s ex-president Bashar al-Assad as part of a probe into deadly 2013 chemical attacks during the country’s civil war.Rights activists say that if the Court of Cassation confirms Assad does not enjoy immunity due to the severity of the accusations, it could set a major precedent in international law towards holding war criminals to account.But if the reasoning is that the warrant is valid because France did not consider Assad to be a legitimate ruler at the time of the alleged crimes, it would not have the same impact.French authorities issued the warrant against Assad in November 2023 over his alleged role in the chain of command for a sarin gas attack that killed more than 1,000 people, according to US intelligence, on August 4 and 5, 2013 in Adra and Douma outside Damascus.Assad is accused of complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the case, though Syrian authorities at the time denied involvement and blamed rebels.The French judiciary tackled the case under the principle of universal jurisdiction, whereby a court may prosecute individuals for serious crimes committed in other countries.An investigation — based on testimonies of survivors and military defectors, as well as photos and video footage — led to warrants for the arrest of Assad, his brother Maher who headed an elite army unit, and two generals.Public prosecutors approved three of the warrants, but issued an appeal against the one targeting Assad, arguing he should have immunity as a head of state.The Paris Court of Appeal in June last year however upheld it, and prosecutors again appealed.Assad’s circumstances have since changed.He and his family fled to Russia, according to Russian authorities, after Islamist-led rebels toppled him in December last year.- Assad immunity issue -Agnes Callamard, a French human rights activist and the secretary general of Amnesty International, said the court’s decision could “pave the way for a major precedent in international law” if it decided immunity should be lifted in certain cases.”A ruling lifting Bashar al-Assad’s immunity would help strengthen the founding principles of international law in its fight against the impunity of war criminals,” she wrote in the newspaper Liberation on Thursday.Callamard however noted that it was unlikely any arrest warrant would lead to Assad being detained as he was protected by Russia.The high court’s prosecutor has recommended the arrest warrant be upheld, but on the grounds that France had not recognised Assad as the legitimate ruler of Syria since 2012.Mazen Darwish, a prominent Syrian lawyer who heads the Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, a civil party to the case, said the prosecutor’s argument was “very clever”.But it “undermines the moral foundation” according to which “immunity should not apply” in cases of war crimes and crimes against humanity, he said.The reasoning “also grants a single foreign government the power to decide who is or is not a legitimate head of state, which sets an extremely dangerous precedent”, he said.French investigating magistrates in January issued a second arrest warrant against Assad for suspected complicity in war crimes for a bombing in the Syrian city of Deraa in 2017 that killed a French-Syrian civilian.Friday’s hearing is scheduled to start at 1300 GMT.

Balancing act for pro-Trump influencers as Epstein furor spirals

Far-right MAGA influencers are treading a tightrope as outrage escalates over the case of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein: they are caught between a fired-up base demanding more information and President Donald Trump, who is eager to turn the page.Trump’s core Make America Great Again base has erupted in anger over the White House’s handling of the so-called “Epstein files,” viewing it as a betrayal by the Republican and his allies who have long championed the unfounded theory that powerful elites orchestrated a massive child sex trafficking cover-up.Calls for the release of those files could intensify after a US media report on Wednesday said Trump’s name was among hundreds found during an official review of documents on Epstein, a claim the White House has denied.Faced with a choice between alienating a base fervently demanding answers or defying Trump — who has implored them to move on — MAGA-aligned influencers and podcasters find themselves in a political bind.MAGA media are “definitely walking a fine line with the Epstein debacle,” Mike Rothschild, an expert on conspiracy theories, told AFP.”Trump demanding that nobody talk about Epstein should be a betrayal for them. But they’re so invested in supporting Trump, and have built their financial support around it, that they really can’t do anything but make excuses and tie themselves in knots.”Some MAGA influencers, however, turned sharply critical in recent weeks.Among them is Rogan O’Handley, who was invited to the White House in February alongside a handful of influencers and presented with binders labeled “The Epstein Files: Phase 1,” only to find they offered little new information.”This is a shameful coverup to protect the most heinous elites,” O’Handley told his 2.2 million followers on X earlier this month.”We were told multiple times the files would be released and now it looks like backroom deals have been made to keep them hidden.”- ‘Fanatically loyal’ -Charlie Kirk, a Trump loyalist and podcaster, faced an avalanche of criticism from the MAGA base after he initially said he was “done talking” about Epstein, and added he was going to trust “my friends in the administration.””Trump’s base has been fanatically loyal, and influencers are hesitant about opposing Trump directly if that threatens the size of their audiences,” Matt Gertz, senior fellow at the watchdog Media Matters for America, told AFP.Fueling the MAGA base’s anger were conclusions from the Justice Department and FBI that Epstein — a disgraced financier who died in jail in 2019 — did not maintain a “client list” as conspiracy theorists have contended. Attorney General Pam Bondi emerged as their key target for criticism after announcing no more information would be forthcoming. But Trump has defended Bondi, while claiming without evidence on Truth Social that the Epstein files were written by his political rivals “Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the losers and criminals of the Biden administration.”That response prompted disbelief from Benny Johnson, a longtime Trump supporter and right-wing podcaster.” By admitting that the Epstein Files are real, and that you’ve read them, and you don’t like their contents, and they were written by your enemies, it doesn’t make the most compelling case as far as I’m concerned. Holy moly,” Johnson said.- ‘Moving target’ -Seeking to redirect attention within the MAGA base — an echo chamber fueled by constant grievance and outrage — Trump has launched attacks on familiar enemies: former president Barack Obama and the media.The White House has promoted the unfounded claim that Obama led a “years-long coup” against Trump around his victorious 2016 election. The former president has rejected the claim.The White House has also barred The Wall Street Journal from traveling with Trump during his upcoming visit to Scotland, after the newspaper reported that he wrote a bawdy birthday message to Epstein.Trump on Friday sued the WSJ and its media magnate owner Rupert Murdoch for at least $10 billion over the allegation in the article, which Trump denies.Following those moves, Stephen Bannon, host of the influential “War Room” podcast, sought to rally influencers behind Trump, telling US media that the MAGA base was “completely unified because now we’re on offense.””The MAGA media’s take on the Epstein case is both fractured and very much a moving target,” said Gertz.”Trump’s recent attacks on The Wall Street Journal and new conspiracy theories about Obama seem to be refocusing their attention away from Epstein — though it’s unclear for how long, particularly given the new revelation that Trump himself is named in the files.”

Lebanese militant to be released after 40 years in French jail

One of France’s longest-held inmates, the pro-Palestinian Lebanese militant Georges Ibrahim Abdallah, will be released and deported on Friday, after more than 40 years behind bars for the killings of two diplomats.At around 3:40 am (01:30 GMT), a convoy of six vehicles left the Lannemezan penitentiary with lights flashing, AFP journalists saw, though they were unable to catch a glimpse of the 74-year-old grey-bearded prisoner.Abdallah was detained in 1984 and sentenced to life in prison in 1987 for his involvement in the murders of US military attache Charles Robert Ray and Israeli diplomat Yacov Barsimantov in Paris.The Paris Court of Appeal had ordered his release “effective July 25” on the condition that he leave French territory and never return.He had been eligible for release since 1999, but his previous requests were denied as the United States — a civil party to the case — consistently opposed him leaving prison.Inmates serving life sentences in France are typically freed after fewer than 30 years.Once out of prison, Abdallah is set to be transported to the Tarbes airport where a police plane will take him to Roissy for a flight to Beirut, according to a source close to the case.Abdallah’s lawyer, Jean-Louis Chalanset, visited for a final time on Thursday. “He seemed very happy about his upcoming release, even though he knows he is returning to the Middle East in an extremely tough context for Lebanese and Palestinian populations,” Chalanset told AFP.AFP visited Abdallah last week after the court’s release decision, accompanying a lawmaker to the detention centre.The founder of the Lebanese Revolutionary Armed Factions (FARL) — a long-disbanded Marxist anti-Israel group — said for more than four decades he had continued to be a “militant with a struggle”.After his arrest in 1984, French police discovered submachine guns and transceiver stations in one of his Paris apartments.The appeals court in February noted that the FARL “had not committed a violent action since 1984” and that Abdallah “today represented a past symbol of the Palestinian struggle”.The appeals judges also found the length of his detention “disproportionate” to the crimes and given his age.Abdallah’s family said they plan to meet him at Beirut airport’s “honour lounge” before heading to their hometown of Kobayat in northern Lebanon where a reception is planned. 

RD Congo: l’ex-président Kabila jugé pour “crimes contre la paix”

L’ex-président de la République démocratique du Congo Joseph Kabila, opposant déclaré au gouvernement actuel, est jugé par la Haute cour militaire du pays à partir de vendredi pour “crime contre la paix”, accusé de complicité avec le groupe armé M23 soutenu par le Rwanda.Joseph Kabila, qui vit à l’étranger depuis plus de deux ans même s’il a récemment été vu dans l’est du pays, ne devrait pas être présent à l’ouverture de son procès. Il est poursuivi pour “participation à un mouvement insurrectionnel, crime contre la paix et la sécurité de l’humanité, homicide intentionnel par balles, trahison, apologie, viol, torture et déportation, occupation à force ouverte de la ville de Goma”, selon l’acte d’accusation.Ces faits sont passibles de la peine de mort en RDC, où un moratoire sur l’exécution de la peine capitale en vigueur depuis 2003 a été levé en 2024 (aucune exécution n’a cependant eu lieu depuis).Fils de Laurent-Désiré Kabila, rebelle ayant fait tomber le dictateur Mobutu Sese Seko, Joseph Kabila, 54 ans, avait hérité du pouvoir en 2001 après l’assassinat de son père. Il a dirigé la RDC jusqu’en 2019, et est resté très discret après son départ du pouvoir. La coalition politique qu’il formait avec son successeur Félix Tshisekedi avait éclaté au bout de deux ans.En avril, l’ex-ministre de la Justice Constant Mutamba avait saisi la justice militaire afin d’engager des poursuites contre M. Kabila “pour sa participation directe” au M23.Le procureur général de l’armée avait déposé une requête en levée de son immunité auprès du Sénat, qui l’avait approuvée par 88 voix contre cinq et avait autorisé les poursuites. M. Kabila bénéficiait de cette immunité en tant qu’ancien chef de l’Etat et sénateur à vie.Un des principaux éléments exposés par le procureur est un témoignage qui attesterait que Joseph Kabila a tenu une conversation téléphonique avec un haut responsable du M23 au sujet d’un plan orchestré par le Rwanda visant à assassiner le président Tshisekedi.D’après ce témoignage, M. Kabila aurait déconseillé la mise en Å“uvre d’une telle machination qui aboutirait à ériger M. Tshisekedi en “martyr”, et aurait affirmé qu’un coup d’Etat militaire est préférable.Dans une rare allocution transmise en ligne le 23 mai, après la levée de son immunité, l’ancien dirigeant avait dénoncé la “dictature” du gouvernement Tshisekedi, et fustigé une justice n’étant plus selon lui “qu’un instrument d’oppression d’une dictature qui tente désespérément de survivre”.- Aucune alliance formelle -Joseph Kabila, qui avait quitté le pays fin 2023, a regagné en mai Goma, grande ville de l’est du pays contrôlée par le groupe armé M23 et des milices congolaises.L’est congolais, région riche en ressources naturelles frontalière du Rwanda, est déchiré par des conflits depuis 30 ans. Les violences se sont intensifiées ces derniers mois avec la prise de contrôle par le M23 de Goma et Bukavu, capitales des provinces du Nord-Kivu et du Sud-Kivu. Le 19 juillet au Qatar, le M23 et le gouvernement de Kinshasa ont signé une déclaration de principes pour un “cessez-le-feu” permanent dans cette partie du pays. Mais jeudi, au moins onze personnes ont été tuées dans des combats entre le M23 et des milices pro-Kinshasa dans le territoire de Masisi, au Nord-Kivu, selon des sources locales.L’accord signé à Doha a été salué par la communauté internationale comme une “avancée” vers un accord de paix global dans l’est de la RDC. De précédents accords de paix et cessez-le-feu ont été violés ces dernières années.Le Rwanda nie soutenir militairement le M23 qui a repris dans ces opérations dans l’est de la RDC. Mais début juillet, des experts de l’ONU ont pointé le “rôle déterminant” joué par son armée dans l’offensive du M23 de janvier et février.Selon un proche de M. Kabila à l’AFP, aucune alliance formelle n’a été conclue entre l’ancien président Kabila et le M23, mais ils partagent un “même objectif”: mettre fin au régime de Félix Tshisekedi.

Once a leading force, battered Tunisian party awaits elusive comeback

The party that once dominated Tunisian politics has faded away since President Kais Saied staged a dramatic power grab, with its offices shuttered and leaders behind bars or in exile.But observers say that Ennahdha, the Islamist-inspired movement still considered by some Tunisians as the country’s main opposition party, could still bounce back after a devastating government crackdown.On July 25, 2021, Saied stunned the country when he suspended parliament and dissolved the government, a move critics denounced as a “coup” a decade after the Arab Spring revolt ushered in a democratic transition in the North African country.Many of Saied’s critics have been prosecuted and jailed, including Ennahdha leader Rached Ghannouchi, 84, a former parliament speaker who was sentenced earlier this month to 14 years in prison for plotting against the state.Ghannouchi, who was arrested in 2023, has racked up several prison terms, including a 22-year sentence handed in February on the same charge.The crackdown over the past four years has seen around 150 Ennahdha figures imprisoned, prosecuted or living in exile, according to a party official.”Some believe the movement is dead, but that is not the case,” said political scientist Slaheddine Jourchi.Ennahdha has been “weakened to the point of clinical death” but remained the most prominent party in Tunisia’s “fragmented and fragile” opposition, Jourchi added.- ‘Once we’re free again’ -Riadh Chaibi, a party official and adviser to Ghannouchi, said that even after “shrinking” its political platform, Ennahdah was still a relevant opposition outlet.”Despite repression, prosecutions and imprisonment” since 2021, “Ennahdha remains the country’s largest political movement,” Chaibi said.He said the current government has been “weaponising state institutions to eliminate political opponents”, but “once we’re free again, like we were in 2011, Ennahdha will regain its strength”.Since 2011, when Ghannouchi returned from exile to lead the party, Ennahdha for years had a key role in Tunisian politics, holding the premiership and other senior roles.But by 2019, the year Saied was elected president, the party’s popularity had already begun waning, winning only a third of the 1.5 million votes it had in 2011.Experts ascribed this trend to the party’s failure to improve living standards and address pressing socio-economic issues.Ennahdha has also been accused of jihadist links, which it has repeatedly denied.Saied, who religiously avoids mentioning either Ennahdha or Ghannouchi by name, has often referred to the party’s years in power as “the black decade” and accused it of committing “crimes against the country”.Crowds of Tunisians, increasingly disillusioned as a political deadlock trumped Ennahdha’s promise of change, poured into the streets in celebration when Saied forced the party out of the halls of power in 2021.Analyst Jourchi said Ennahdha’s rise to power was a “poorly prepared adventure”, and the party had “made many mistakes along the way”.Left-wing politician Mongi Rahoui said it was “only natural that Ennahdha leaders and their governing partners be prosecuted for crimes they used their political position to commit”.Today, the party’s activities have been reduced mostly to issuing statements online, often reacting to prison sentences handed down to critics of Saied.- ‘Silence everything’ -But Ennahdha has weathered repression before, harshly suppressed under Tunisia’s autocratic presidents Habib Bourguiba and Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.Party leaders were jailed or forced into exile, and Ghannouchi was sentenced to life in prison under Bourguiba but then freed — and later exiled — under Ben Ali.Tunisian historian Abdellatif Hannachi said that the party “seems to be bending with the wind, waiting for changes that would allow it to return”.It has been in “clear decline”, he added, but “that does not mean it’s disappearing.”Ennahdha’s downfall was not an isolated case. Other opposition forces have also been crushed, and dozens of political, media and business figures are currently behind bars.”This regime no longer distinguishes between Islamist and secular, progressive and conservative,” rights advocate Kamel Jendoubi, a former minister, recently said in a Facebook post.Saied’s government “wants to silence everything that thinks, that criticises, or resists”, Jendoubi argued.The opposition, however, remains fractured, failing for example to come together in rallies planned for the anniversary this month of Saied’s power grab.

Asian markets turn lower as trade war rally fades

Asian stocks fell Friday as their latest rally ran out of legs, with sentiment weighed by strong US jobs data that saw investors row back their expectations for interest rate cuts.With Japan’s trade deal with Washington out of the way for now, attention was also turning to European Union attempts to reach an agreement to pare down Donald Trump’s threatened tariffs before next Friday’s deadline.Equities have enjoyed a strong run-up for much of July on expectations governments will hammer out pacts, pushing some markets past or close to record highs.However, while Wall Street hit new records Thursday — S&P 500 chalked up its 10th in 19 sessions — another round of strong jobs data suggested the Federal Reserve might have to wait longer than hoped to cut borrowing costs.The 217,000 initial claims for unemployment benefits in the week to July 19 was the lowest since mid-April and suggested the labour market remains tight.The figures followed forecast-topping non-farm payrolls in June and come as inflation shows signs of picking up as Trump’s tariffs begin to bite.Traders are now betting on 42 basis points of rate cuts by the end of the year, according to Bloomberg News. That’s down from more than 50 previously.Meanwhile, a manufacturing survey showed US business confidence deteriorated in July for the second successive month, with companies worried about tariffs and cuts to federal spending.Trump continued to press Fed chief Jerome Powell to slash interest rates during a visit to its headquarters on Thursday, where they bickered over its renovation cost.The president, who wants to oust Powell over his refusal to cut, took a fresh dig during the trip, telling reporters: “As good as we’re doing, we’d do better if we had lower interest rates.”Trump’s anger at the Fed and his calls for officials to lower rates has raised concerns about the independence of the central bank.”While unlikely to yield anything concrete, the optics of a president storming the temple of monetary orthodoxy is enough to put Powell watchers on edge,” said SPI Asset Management’s Stephen Innes.”The risk isn’t immediate policy change — it’s longer-term erosion of independence, and the signal that Powell may not be sitting as comfortably as markets assume.”Trade hopes remain elevated, with Brussels and Washington appearing close to a deal that would halve Trump’s threatened 30 percent levy, with a European Commission spokesman saying he believed an agreement was “within reach”. The bloc, however, is still forging ahead with contingency plans in case talks fail, with member states approving a 93-billion-euro ($109-billion) package of counter-tariffs.With few positive catalysts to drive buying, Asian markets turned lower heading into the weekend.Tokyo dipped after putting on around five percent in the previous two days, while Hong Kong retreated following five days of gains.There were also losses in Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Manila and Jakarta. Seoul and Wellington edged up.The dollar extended gains against its peers as investors pared their rate forecasts.- Key figures at around 0230 GMT -Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 0.6 percent at 41,570.24 (break)Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.7 percent at 25,487.95Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 0.2 percent at 3,597.77Dollar/yen: UP at 147.40 yen from 146.94 yen on ThursdayEuro/dollar: DOWN at $1.1742 from $1.1756Pound/dollar: DOWN at $1.3498 from $1.3507Euro/pound: DOWN at 86.99 pence from 87.01 penceWest Texas Intermediate: UP 0.6 percent at $66.43 per barrelBrent North Sea Crude: UP 0.6 percent at $69.61 per barrelNew York – Dow: DOWN 0.7 percent at 44,693.91 (close)London – FTSE 100: UP 0.9 percent at 9,138.37 (close)