Vance confirms five-year-old among detainees in US immigration crackdown

Vice President JD Vance confirmed Thursday that a five-year-old boy was among those detained by federal agents during a massive immigration crackdown in Minneapolis, stirring outrage in the northern city and across the US.As “the father of a five-year-old” himself, Vance acknowledged he was stunned by news of the child’s predicament at first.”I think to myself ‘Oh, my God, this is terrible. How did we arrest a five-year-old?'” Vance said Thursday, pivoting to say he then did more research and changed his mind because Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detained the child after his father ran from immigration agents.”Well, what are they supposed to do? Are they supposed to let a five-year-old child freeze to death?”More broadly, Vance blamed local leaders for disorder on a visit to the troubled midwestern state, which has been rocked by increasingly tense protests since federal agents shot and killed US citizen Renee Good on January 7.The child’s detention came as the US attorney general announced Thursday the arrests of three activists accused of disrupting a St. Paul church service in a protest, accusing a pastor at the church of working for ICE.Thousands of federal agents have been deployed to the Democratic-led state, as the Trump administration presses its campaign to deport what it says are millions of illegal immigrants across the country.The arrests of lawyer and social activist Nekima Levy Armstrong, Chauntyll Louisa Allen and William Kelly in connection with a Sunday protest at Cities Church in the state capital St. Paul, were announced by Attorney General Pam Bondi on X.Bondi said Armstrong “allegedly played a key role in organizing the coordinated attack on Cities Church.” Videos of that protest showed dozens of demonstrators chanting “ICE out!” in the church.Amid growing local anger over the use of pepper spray, tear gas and other forceful tactics adopted by ICE in the streets of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Vance defended the conduct of ICE and called on protesters to be peaceful.”Yes, protest. Protest me. Protest our immigration policy, but do it peacefully. If you assault a law enforcement officer the Trump administration and the Department of Justice is going to prosecute you,” Vance said, flanked by ICE officers and vehicles.- Plight of a 5-year-old -The latest uproar over ICE’s tactics has been over the ICE detention on Tuesday of a five-year-old boy, Liam Conejo Ramos, and his father — one of at least four children detained in the same Minneapolis school district this month, according to administrators, local media have reported.Ramos and his father are now held in San Antonio, Texas, in the custody of Homeland Security authorities, the family’s lawyer, Marc Prokosch, was quoted as saying by The Washington Post. Prokosch said they are not US citizens but have followed the legal process in applying for asylum, in Minneapolis which is a sanctuary city, meaning police do not cooperate with federal immigration sweeps.Vance claimed such local efforts were hindering ICE efforts.”The lack of cooperation between state and local officials makes it harder for us to do our job and turns up the temperature,” Vance said.Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey told a news conference that he agreed with Vance that people should protest peacefully.But he complained that the influx of 3,000 federal agents in the city felt like an “occupation” and that agents were “terrorizing people,” the Minnesota Star Tribune reported Thursday.Minnesota has sought a temporary restraining order for the ICE operation in the state which, if granted by a federal judge, would pause the sweeps. There will be a hearing on the application Monday.The officer who fired the shots that killed Good, Jonathan Ross, has neither been suspended nor charged with any crime. Trump and his officials quickly defended his actions as being legitimately made in self-defense.The federal immigration sweeps in Minneapolis have occurred amid a highly politicized fraud investigation in Minnesota.

Trump’s MAGA movement ramps up attacks on ‘progressive white women’

Progressive white women have been persistent punching bags of President Donald Trump’s MAGA movement, but attacks targeting the demographic group have become particularly vicious in recent weeks.The death of Renee Good, a 37-year-old American woman killed by a federal agent while protesting Trump’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota, has prompted harsh comments against her by numerous conservative commentators.Radio host Erick Erickson coined an acronym to describe Good — “AWFUL,” or Affluent White Female Urban Liberal.”White liberal women are a cancer on the nation. They have no real problems, so they’re bored” and take on other people’s fights, right-wing comedian Vincent Oshana wrote on X.”They just want to feel important.”Columnist David Marcus meanwhile derisively referred to women activists, like Good, protesting against Trump’s immigration actions as “organized gangs of wine moms.”- Women’s suffrage a ‘tragedy’ -The attacks come amid a dual offensive on the American right — against modern feminism and placing renewed value on masculinity.Some right-wing players, particularly Christian nationalists, have for years called for a rethink of the role of women in modern society, even demanding the end of the constitutional right to vote.The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution “has been a moral and political tragedy for America,” firebrand pastor Dale Partridge said in a video last month.”Why? Women were not made to lead, but to follow and to feel.”Juliet Williams, a gender studies professor at University of California Los Angeles, said such comments are typical of a patriarchal worldview that requires men to “understand themselves as inherently superior.”Trump’s administration has meanwhile sought to portray a masculine persona — typified by Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, who frequently posts videos doing push-ups with soldiers.Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. recently praised Trump’s testosterone levels, saying that another official called them “the highest” he has seen for someone over 70.In this ideology, Williams said, “hatred of white liberal women is really necessary” because they challenge the ideals of the Christian right.Women in general favored the Democratic candidate in the 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential elections — but majorities of white women actually voted for Trump, according to Pew Research polling.Several studies suggest a growing divergence among younger voters.Gen Z women largely identify as progressive, while young men — an important demographic in Trump’s latest victory — increasingly lean right.Williams said attacks on women Democratic voters could be aimed at influencing young women who “are more aware than ever of how closely their social value is indexed on looking a certain way.”- ‘Just hotter’ -The women who gravitate around Trump’s White House usually wear stylish clothes, high heels, have long wavy hair, and wear heavy makeup. Botox and filler are not rare.Katie Miller — a podcaster and wife of Stephen Miller, one of the US president’s most influential advisers — openly mocks what she considers to be the unattractive and unkempt appearance of left-wing women.”Conservative women are just hotter than Liberal women,” she wrote on X, claiming that was the reason conservative families have more children.The Millers recently announced they are expecting their fourth child, as did Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt is also pregnant with her second child.

TikTok establishes joint venture to end US ban threat

TikTok announced Thursday it has established a majority American-owned joint venture to operate its US business, allowing the company to avoid a ban over its Chinese ownership.The TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC will serve more than 200 million users and 7.5 million businesses while implementing strict safeguards for data protection, algorithm security and content moderation, the company said.The new structure responds to a law passed under President Donald Trump’s predecessor, Joe Biden, that forced Chinese-owned ByteDance to sell TikTok’s US operations or face a ban in its biggest market.Trump welcomed and claimed credit for the deal, but also thanked Chinese President Xi Jinping for approving it.”I am so happy to have helped in saving TikTok!” Trump said in a post on Truth Social late Thursday. “It will now be owned by a group of Great American Patriots and Investors, the Biggest in the World, and will be an important Voice.””I would also like to thank President Xi, of China, for working with us and, ultimately, approving the Deal,” he added.ByteDance retains a 19.9 percent stake in the joint venture — keeping its ownership below the 20 percent threshold stipulated by the law.Three investors — Silver Lake, Oracle and Abu Dhabi-based AI investment fund MGX — each hold 15 percent stakes. Oracle’s executive chairman Larry Ellison is a longtime Trump ally.Other investors include Dell Family Office, affiliates of Susquehanna International Group and General Atlantic, and several other investment firms.The joint venture will retain decision-making authority over trust and safety policies and content moderation for US users, while TikTok’s global entities will manage international product integration and commercial activities including e-commerce and advertising.Under the arrangement, US user data will be stored in Oracle’s secure cloud environment, with cybersecurity audited by third-party experts and adhering to federal standards, TikTok said.The joint venture will be governed by a seven-member, majority-American board including TikTok CEO Shou Chew and executives from major investment firms.TikTok executive Adam Presser was appointed CEO of the new entity, with Will Farrell serving as chief security officer.The 2024 law came as US policymakers, including Trump in his first presidency, warned that China could use TikTok to mine Americans’ data or exert influence through its algorithm.But Trump, crediting the app for his appeal with young voters, delayed enforcement through successive executive orders, most recently extending the deadline to January 22.The deal largely confirms an outline announced to staff by Chew last month.Trump said in September that a new venture had been agreed with China and would meet the law’s requirements.Trump specifically named Ellison, one of the world’s richest men, as a major player in the arrangement.Ellison has returned to the spotlight through his dealings with Trump, who has brought his old friend into major AI partnerships with OpenAI. Ellison has also financed his son David’s recent takeover of Paramount and bidding war with Netflix for Warner Bros.

Reprise vendredi du procès en appel du cinéaste Christophe Ruggia, jugé pour agressions sexuelles sur mineure

La cour d’appel de Paris reprend vendredi le cours du procès en appel du cinéaste Christophe Ruggia, jugé pour agressions sexuelles sur l’actrice Adèle Haenel entre ses 12 et 14 ans, une affaire emblématique du #MeToo du cinéma français.Initialement prévue sur une seule après-midi le 19 décembre dernier, l’audience avait été mise en continuation au mois suivant en raison de l’heure tardive.A 20 heures, la cour avait seulement eu le temps de procéder à l’interrogatoire laborieux du réalisateur. Sur le banc de la partie civile, Adèle Haenel trépignait d’impatience et de nervosité.Lors d’un interrogatoire éreintant long de cinq heures, le cinéaste, veste noire sur pull sombre, s’était enferré dans le déni, martelant comme depuis le premier jour n’être “ni un agresseur sexuel, ni un violeur, ni un pédophile ou quoi que ce soit de ce genre”.Aujourd’hui âgé de 61 ans, Christophe Ruggia est poursuivi pour agressions sexuelles de 2001 à 2004 sur la comédienne, dans la foulée de l’éprouvant tournage du film d’auteur “Les diables”, où le réalisateur, de 24 ans son aîné, avait offert à la jeune adolescente son premier rôle de cinéma.Dans cette affaire, révélée en 2019 dans une enquête de Mediapart, il a été condamné en février à quatre ans de prison, dont deux ferme à effectuer sous bracelet électronique.”Si j’avais fait ce qu’elle m’accuse d’avoir fait, avoir mis la main dans son pantalon ne serait-ce qu’une fois, je n’aurais jamais pu me regarder dans la glace et j’aurais cessé immédiatement de la voir. Ça n’est jamais arrivé”, s’est indigné Christophe Ruggia devant la cour.Pour justifier les visites d’Adèle Haenel à son domicile parisien chaque samedi après-midi, il s’est présenté en passeur de culture pour une jeune comédienne faisant ses premiers pas dans le métier, avide de conseils et de découvrir le monde.”J’ai plus de 5.000 DVD à la maison, plein de livres (…). On parle de livres, de films, de voyages, de son école, de mes projets”, a-t-il soutenu.- “Reconstruction” -De manière constante, de sa première prise de parole publique au premier procès électrique de décembre 2024, Adèle Haenel décrit à l’occasion de ces rendez-vous des caresses répétées et non consenties de Christophe Ruggia sur son corps de collégienne.S’il concède une “souffrance authentique” de la part de l’actrice, aujourd’hui âgée de 36 ans, le réalisateur attribue ses accusations à une “reconstruction” mentale postérieure de sa part.D’après lui, Adèle Haenel, qui avait à l’époque du mal à décrocher un autre rôle après “Les diables”, lui en aurait voulu de ne pas pouvoir tourner dans le film suivant qu’il préparait.”Il y a une reconstruction dans les souvenirs d’Adèle qui va jusqu’à un truc du genre +ouais en fait il voulait coucher avec moi+”, a-t-il hasardé. “Elle est dans un milieu lesbien, contre lequel j’ai absolument rien, mais qui a une vision particulière des rapports entre les femmes et les hommes, des violences sexuelles”.En raison du report de l’audience, Adèle Haenel, extrêmement nerveuse et agitée, n’avait pas eu l’occasion d’être appelée à la barre en décembre.En première instance, les démentis répétés du prévenu avaient excédé l’actrice, qui a tourné le dos au monde du cinéma. Elle avait interrompu son interrogatoire en hurlant “mais ferme ta gueule !” avant de quitter la salle d’audience.Dans son jugement de première instance, le tribunal de Paris a estimé que le prévenu avait profité de son ascendant sur l’actrice débutante, “conséquence de la relation instaurée” pendant le tournage du film “Les diables”.À l’occasion des rendez-vous hebdomadaires à son domicile, Christophe Ruggia “continuait d’exercer son autorité de réalisateur, (l’adolescente) n’était pas en mesure de s’opposer ni de s’extraire de cette emprise”, avaient estimé les juges.Après son rôle le plus marquant dans “Portrait de la jeune fille en feu” (2019) de la réalisatrice Céline Sciamma, devenue une œuvre féministe et lesbienne de référence, Adèle Haenel a rompu avec le 7e art à partir de 2020 pour se consacrer au théâtre et au militantisme de gauche radicale.

Pakistan battles legions of fake doctors

Rusted nails hold used infusion tubes on the wall of a clinic run by one among hundreds of thousands of unqualified doctors operating across Pakistan.Dozens of patients visit the small roadside shop each day in the southern Sindh province, where a few chairs are arranged around wooden tables used to lay patients down. “These patients have faith in me. They believe I can treat them well,” said Abdul Waheed, who opened the facility a few months ago outside Hyderabad city. During the day, the 48-year-old works at a private hospital in Hyderabad. In the evenings, he comes to the village of Tando Saeed Khan to see patients at his clinic, charging 300 rupees ($1) per consultation. “I have spent so much time in this field. I have worked with several doctors. Thanks to God, I have confidence to diagnose a patient and treat the disease,” Waheed told AFP. There is no signboard, no registration number, and he has no legal authorisation to practise as a doctor.Waheed, who has a diploma in homeopathy and has completed a four-year nursing course, speaks with confidence.After examining two young children, he insisted that patients come to him willingly and trust his abilities.”No one has questioned me yet. If someone comes, I will see what to do,” he said, reflecting the ease with which unqualified individuals practise medicine in Pakistan.Such unlicensed clinics are often the first, and sometimes the only, point of care for poor communities.- Dangerously reusing equipment – Abdul Ghafoor Shoro, secretary general of the Pakistan Medical Association, said there are “more than 600,000 fake doctors” operating across Pakistan. This nationwide figure has been confirmed by the Sindh Healthcare Commission (SHCC), based on estimates from the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council.Calling the practise a public health epidemic, Shoro said that such practitioners work with doctors, learn a few things there, and then open their own clinics. “Unqualified doctors don’t know the side effects and exact dosage of medicines. If a disease is not properly diagnosed, it can become dangerous,” Shoro said. “The instruments they use are not sterilised. They simply wash them with water and continue using them. They reuse syringes, which increases the spread of hepatitis and AIDS.” As AFP journalists visited Tando Saeed Khan, another unqualified doctor immediately closed his clinic and disappeared.Outside Waheed’s shop, villager Ali Ahmed said there are multiple such clinics in the area.”None of them have qualified doctors. People aren’t educated and can’t recognise qualified doctors,” the 31-year-old told AFP. – Lifelong damage -Medical experts say this unchecked practise has a direct impact on Pakistan’s already strained healthcare system, with tertiary care hospitals overwhelmed by patients whose conditions worsen after improper treatment. Khalid Bukhari, the head of Civil Hospital Karachi, said the facility regularly receives such cases from across the country. “They misdiagnose and mistreat patients. Our hospital is overloaded. Most of the cases we receive are those ruined by them,” said Bukhari, whose public hospital is one of the largest in the country. “These people are playing with the lives of poor citizens. If people go to proper doctors and receive precise treatment, they will not need to come to us.” Regulatory authorities acknowledge their failure to control the problem.  “We have limited resources. This practise cannot be eliminated easily. If we shut down 25 outlets, 25 new ones open the very next day,” said Ahson Qavi Siddiqi, the head of Sindh HealthCare Commission (SHCC).The commission recently sealed a bungalow in Karachi that had been operating as a hospital — complete with intensive care units for children and adults — because it was unregistered. “The law against it is weak. We file cases, but the accused get bail the next day because it is a bailable offence,” Siddiqi told AFP. The official also described serious security threats faced by inspection teams.”These people are influential in their areas. In many cases, our teams are taken hostage. We are fired upon. I don’t have the force to take strong action,” the SHCC head said.Shoro said the practise also financially destroys families who are left with big hospital bills when something goes wrong. “Many people die or become disabled, and their families suffer for the rest of their lives.”

Budget: Lecornu affronte deux motions de censure, avant un nouveau 49.3

Les députés devraient rejeter vendredi les deux motions de censure déposées par la gauche hors PS et l’extrême droite en réponse au 49.3 déclenché par Sébastien Lecornu sur la partie “recettes” du budget, permettant à celui-ci d’engager un deuxième 49.3, sur la partie “dépenses” du texte.Rompant la promesse qu’il avait faite le 3 octobre de ne pas faire usage de cet article décrié de la Constitution, le Premier ministre a engagé mardi la responsabilité de son gouvernement pour faire passer cette première partie du texte sans vote.La France insoumise, le groupe GDR (communistes et ultra-marins) et les écologistes ont déposé dans la foulée une motion de censure commune, de même que le Rassemblement national et son allié le groupe ciottiste UDR.Ni l’une ni l’autre ne devrait passer, le PS et LR ayant annoncé ne pas les voter.Engagé depuis l’automne dans une négociation avec le Premier ministre, le PS se félicite d’avoir obtenu un certain nombre d'”avancées”, même s’il ne reconnaît pas le texte comme le sien. Et s’il regrette l’usage du 49.3, après avoir réclamé son abandon à M. Lecornu, il estime que c’était la “moins mauvaise” des solutions, faute de majorité en faveur du texte.Dans sa motion, la gauche hors PS accuse le Premier ministre de “renie(r) sa propre parole” et de mettre en oeuvre des “coupes budgétaires d’un niveau inégalé” pour atteindre l’objectif de 5% de déficit qu’il s’est fixé.”A l’inverse, les mesures de ce budget présentées comme des compromis ne sont que de la poudre aux yeux”, fustige-t-elle, citant la surtaxe de l’impôt sur les sociétés (qui rapportera 7,3 milliards d’euros au lieu de 8 en 2025 et 4 prévus dans le projet de loi initial), ou la taxe holding, devenue “homéopathique” après son passage au Sénat.Quant à la prime d’activité dont se félicitent les socialistes, elle revient à “faire payer par l’Etat le complément de revenu que les grandes entreprises refusent de verser à leurs salariés”.Le RN et l’UDR dénoncent eux aussi le “reniement de la parole” du Premier ministre. Et sur le fond un budget qui “ne répond pas à la crise du pouvoir d’achat”, “n’offre aucune mesure de justice fiscale” ni “aucune économie structurelle”, et “continue de creuser le déficit”.Une fois les deux motions rejetées, le gouvernement devrait engager dans la foulée sa responsabilité sur la partie dépenses et l’ensemble du texte, suscitant deux nouvelles motions de censure, qui devraient être rejetées en début de semaine prochaine.Après un bref passage au Sénat, le texte devrait revenir à l’Assemblée pour un troisième et dernier 49.3, et d’ultimes motions de censure.Une fois ces étapes franchies, le chef du gouvernement se rendra vendredi après-midi à Rosny-sous-Bois, en Seine-Saint-Denis, pour présenter un plan en faveur du logement, grâce notamment à des dernières mesures prévues dans le budget.