Trump unveils ‘Board of Peace’, ‘New Gaza’ plans at Davos

US President Donald Trump headed home from Davos on Thursday after unveiling his new “Board of Peace” and once again casting himself as a global peacemaker, despite widespread scepticism over a plan that aims to rewrite the world order.Trump officials also unveiled ambitious plans for a “New Gaza” during the ceremony at the World Economic Forum, the US leader describing the devastated Palestinian territory as “great real estate”.Trump later met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, with both describing their talks as good and the US leader saying Russia’s nearly four-year-old war with Kyiv “has to end”.Zelensky announced “trilateral” talks between Washington, Moscow and Kyiv in the coming days, and said he had reached agreement with Trump on post-war US security guarantees for Ukraine — though he conceded that dialogue with the US president was “not simple”.And the Ukrainian leader hit out at European allies for being too slow to counter Russian President Vladimir Putin, asking: “What’s missing: time or political will?”- ‘Board of Peace’ -Trump’s “Board of Peace” was created after he expressed frustration at failing to win the Nobel Peace Prize and ramped up accusations the United Nations had failed to resolve a host of international conflicts.”Well this is exciting,” Trump said as he was joined on stage by leaders and officials from 19 countries to sign the board’s founding charter in the Swiss ski resort.”This board has the chance to be one of the most consequential bodies ever created,” he said.The body, of which Trump is the chairman, was initially designed to oversee the Gaza truce and the reconstruction of the strip after the war between Hamas and Israel.But its purpose has since morphed into resolving all sorts of international conflicts, sparking concerns that Trump wants to create a rival to the UN.Key US allies including France and Britain have expressed doubts.Countries have been asked to pay $1 billion for permanent membership of the board, and the invitation for Putin, whose country invaded Ukraine in 2022, has drawn criticism.Trump said the organisation would work “in conjunction” with the United Nations.- Gaza ‘master plan’ -A large part of the ceremony was devoted to talking about its plans for shattered Gaza.Gaza’s newly appointed administrator said in a video message that the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Gaza Strip would reopen in both directions next week.Then Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, like the president a former property developer, showed slides of what he billed as a “master plan” for Gaza’s reconstruction.They included maps of new settlements and artist renderings of gleaming seafront hotels and apartments under the caption “New Gaza”.”It could be a hope. It could be a destination,” Kushner said.Trump told Hamas to disarm under the next phase of the Gaza ceasefire accord or it would be the “end of them”. He added that he was ready to “talk” with regional foe Iran.- ‘Not so popular’ -The representatives of the 19 countries on stage with Trump included two close populist allies, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Argentine President Javier Milei, and officials from a host of Middle Eastern monarchies keen to curry favour.Trump said he expected around 50 countries to join — including Putin, though the latter said he was still studying the invitation.Zelensky, also invited, has said he could not envisage working alongside the Russian leader.Trump said he was hopeful of a deal soon to end the Ukraine war, and Zelensky told the forum that documents being drafted with Washington to end the war were “nearly, nearly ready”.Zelensky has voiced concern that Trump’s push to seize Greenland — which dominated Davos on Wednesday — could divert focus away from Russia’s invasion.Tensions over Greenland eased, however, after Trump announced a “framework of a future deal” over the Danish territory and dropped his threat to hit European allies with new tariffs.Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said the Arctic island wanted a “peaceful dialogue” with Washington and it wanted to remain part of Denmark for now.”We have some red lines,” he told a press conference. “We have to respect our territorial integrity. We have to respect international law, sovereignty.”Global stock markets rallied with relief at Trump’s Greenland climbdown, riding what some called the “TACO” trade — for “Trump Always Chickens Out”.But as European leaders gathered in Brussels for a summit, worries lingered over lasting damage to transatlantic ties.burs-dk-lt/jhb/jj

Trump unveils ‘Board of Peace’, ‘New Gaza’ plans at Davos

US President Donald Trump headed home from Davos on Thursday after unveiling his new “Board of Peace” and once again casting himself as a global peacemaker, despite widespread scepticism over a plan that aims to rewrite the world order.Trump officials also unveiled ambitious plans for a “New Gaza” during the ceremony at the World Economic Forum, the US leader describing the devastated Palestinian territory as “great real estate”.Trump later met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, with both describing their talks as good and the US leader saying Russia’s nearly four-year-old war with Kyiv “has to end”.Zelensky announced “trilateral” talks between Washington, Moscow and Kyiv in the coming days, and said he had reached agreement with Trump on post-war US security guarantees for Ukraine — though he conceded that dialogue with the US president was “not simple”.And the Ukrainian leader hit out at European allies for being too slow to counter Russian President Vladimir Putin, asking: “What’s missing: time or political will?”- ‘Board of Peace’ -Trump’s “Board of Peace” was created after he expressed frustration at failing to win the Nobel Peace Prize and ramped up accusations the United Nations had failed to resolve a host of international conflicts.”Well this is exciting,” Trump said as he was joined on stage by leaders and officials from 19 countries to sign the board’s founding charter in the Swiss ski resort.”This board has the chance to be one of the most consequential bodies ever created,” he said.The body, of which Trump is the chairman, was initially designed to oversee the Gaza truce and the reconstruction of the strip after the war between Hamas and Israel.But its purpose has since morphed into resolving all sorts of international conflicts, sparking concerns that Trump wants to create a rival to the UN.Key US allies including France and Britain have expressed doubts.Countries have been asked to pay $1 billion for permanent membership of the board, and the invitation for Putin, whose country invaded Ukraine in 2022, has drawn criticism.Trump said the organisation would work “in conjunction” with the United Nations.- Gaza ‘master plan’ -A large part of the ceremony was devoted to talking about its plans for shattered Gaza.Gaza’s newly appointed administrator said in a video message that the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Gaza Strip would reopen in both directions next week.Then Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, like the president a former property developer, showed slides of what he billed as a “master plan” for Gaza’s reconstruction.They included maps of new settlements and artist renderings of gleaming seafront hotels and apartments under the caption “New Gaza”.”It could be a hope. It could be a destination,” Kushner said.Trump told Hamas to disarm under the next phase of the Gaza ceasefire accord or it would be the “end of them”. He added that he was ready to “talk” with regional foe Iran.- ‘Not so popular’ -The representatives of the 19 countries on stage with Trump included two close populist allies, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban and Argentine President Javier Milei, and officials from a host of Middle Eastern monarchies keen to curry favour.Trump said he expected around 50 countries to join — including Putin, though the latter said he was still studying the invitation.Zelensky, also invited, has said he could not envisage working alongside the Russian leader.Trump said he was hopeful of a deal soon to end the Ukraine war, and Zelensky told the forum that documents being drafted with Washington to end the war were “nearly, nearly ready”.Zelensky has voiced concern that Trump’s push to seize Greenland — which dominated Davos on Wednesday — could divert focus away from Russia’s invasion.Tensions over Greenland eased, however, after Trump announced a “framework of a future deal” over the Danish territory and dropped his threat to hit European allies with new tariffs.Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said the Arctic island wanted a “peaceful dialogue” with Washington and it wanted to remain part of Denmark for now.”We have some red lines,” he told a press conference. “We have to respect our territorial integrity. We have to respect international law, sovereignty.”Global stock markets rallied with relief at Trump’s Greenland climbdown, riding what some called the “TACO” trade — for “Trump Always Chickens Out”.But as European leaders gathered in Brussels for a summit, worries lingered over lasting damage to transatlantic ties.burs-dk-lt/jhb/jj

Musk’s Grok created three million sexualized images, research says

Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok generated an estimated three million sexualized images of women and children in a matter of days, researchers said Thursday, revealing the scale of the explicit content that sparked a global outcry.The recent rollout of an editing feature on Grok, developed by Musk’s startup xAI and integrated into X, allowed users to alter online images of real people with simple text prompts such as “put her in a bikini” or “remove her clothes.”A flood of lewd deepfakes exploded online, prompting several countries to ban Grok and drawing outrage from regulators and victims.”The AI tool Grok is estimated to have generated approximately three million sexualized images, including 23,000 that appear to depict children, after the launch of a new image editing feature powered by the tool on X,” said the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a nonprofit watchdog that researches the harmful effects of online disinformation.CCDH’s report estimated that Grok generated this volume of photorealistic images over an 11-day period — an average rate of 190 per minute.The report did not say how many images were created without the consent of the people pictured.It said public figures identified in Grok’s sexualized images included American actress Selena Gomez, singers Taylor Swift and Nicki Minaj as well as politicians such as Swedish Deputy Prime Minister Ebba Busch and former US vice president Kamala Harris.”The data is clear: Elon Musk’s Grok is a factory for the production of sexual abuse material,” Imran Ahmed, the chief executive of CCDH.”By deploying AI without safeguards, Musk enabled the creation of an estimated 23,000 sexualized images of children in two weeks, and millions more images of adult women.” There was no immediate comment about the findings from X. When reached by AFP by email, xAI replied with a terse automated response: “Legacy Media Lies.”Last week, following the global outrage, X announced that it would “geoblock the ability” of all Grok and X users to create images of people in “bikinis, underwear, and similar attire” in jurisdictions where such actions are illegal.It was not immediately clear where the tool would be restricted.The announcement came after California’s attorney general launched an investigation into xAI over the sexually explicit material and several countries opened their own probes.”Belated fixes cannot undo this harm. We must hold Big Tech accountable for giving abusers the power to victimize women and girls at the click of a button,” Ahmed said.Grok’s digital undressing spree comes amid growing concerns among tech campaigners over proliferating AI nudification apps.Last week, the Philippines became the third country to ban Grok, following Southeast Asian neighbors Malaysia and Indonesia, while Britain and France said they would maintain pressure on the company.On Wednesday, the Philippines’s Cybercrime Investigation and Coordinating Center said it was ending the short-lived ban after xAI agreed to modify the tool for the local market and eliminate its ability to create “pornographic content.”

Gazans pay homage to Palestinian journalists killed by Israel

Hundreds of red-eyed and exhausted people, including many journalists, crowded into the grounds of Nasser Hospital in Khan Yunis in Gaza on Thursday to pay tribute to three fallen colleagues.The three, including a regular AFP contributor, were killed by an Israeli strike the day before that the military said had targeted “suspects” operating a drone.Mourners gathered around the bodies as they were taken from the morgue towards the hospital courtyard, where men lined up in silence to perform an Islamic funeral prayer recited for the dead.”Today we are witnessing a systematic execution by the Israeli occupation forces of our colleagues,” Ibrahim Qannan, one of the oldest journalists present, told the crowd.On one stretcher, a bulletproof vest marked “Press” was laid on the body of Abdul Raouf Shaath, a regular AFP contributor.Also on the vest, under a slate-gray sky where many men brought together in mourning wore hoodies and woollen caps, lay two dandelions and some flower petals.”Abed loved journalism and held it in high esteem because it documents the truth,” his father Samir Shaath told AFP, using his dead son’s nickname.He was just about able to help carry the stretcher bearing his boy, as other journalists crowded round to embrace him.”Abed’s not the first journalist they’ve targeted,” Samir Shaath said.According to media watchdog group Reporters Without Borders (RSF), since Hamas’s October 2023 attack on Israel sparked the war in Gaza, nearly 220 journalists have been killed by Israel, making the Palestinian territory by far the deadliest place for journalists.RSF said at least 71 have been targeted or killed while working.- ‘Another crime’ -The Israeli military says it never deliberately attacks journalists. However, it has admitted killing a number of press professionals it accused of being “terrorist” members of the armed wing of Hamas or other Palestinian groups.Israel was not a signatory of the extra Article 79 to the Geneva Conventions, which updated the laws of war in the wake of World War II.It states that “journalists in war zones must be treated as civilians and protected as such, provided they play no part in the hostilities”.On Thursday, a young woman journalist cried as her hand stroked a body bag holding one of her colleagues.The three killed on Wednesday by the Israeli air strike were Shaath, Mohammed Salah Qashta and Anas Ghneim.In the morgue, a relative sobbed silently, his forearm covering his eyes.It was a scene that has become all too familiar in Gaza.Some recalled last August 25, when Israeli strikes on a hospital in the southern Gaza Strip killed five Palestinian journalists, including a contributor to the American news agency Associated Press (AP).”This is another crime to add to the long list of crimes committed by Israel against journalists,” said Adly Abu Taha on Thursday.”The occupation has ignored all international laws and conventions that guarantee the protection of journalists and has directly targeted them.”On Wednesday, the Israeli military said it was looking into the circumstances of the deadly strike that killed the three.It told AFP on Thursday it had nothing more to add at this stage. After the burial, which as tradition dictates was carried out by men only, Shaath’s mother was able to clutch her son’s bulletproof vest.Surrounded by grieving women at Al-Mawasi camp in southern Gaza, where Palestinians displaced by fighting and bombardment live in precarious conditions, Nur al-Huda pressed her lips together to keep from crying.

Refuser les enfants en train ? la SNCF empêtrée dans une polémique “no kids”

Refuser les enfants dans les trains ? la SNCF a dû se défendre jeudi d’exclure les jeunes voyageurs de ses trains après un vif débat au sujet de sa nouvelle classe affaires Optimum “sans enfants”.La polémique est partie du compte Instagram du podcast “Les adultes de demain” dédié à l’enfance, qui a relevé dans une communication de la SNCF l’exclusion des enfants de cette classe premium lancée le 8 janvier sur toutes ses liaisons à grande vitesse, en remplacement de la Business Première.”Pour garantir un maximum de confort à bord de l’espace dédié, les enfants ne sont pas acceptés”, écrivait SNCF Voyageurs dans un document publicitaire relayé par ce compte Instagram.”Une ligne rouge a été franchie. (…) La première entreprise publique de transport français cède à son tour au +no kid+ (pas d’enfants, NDLR)”, s’est émue Stéphanie d’Esclaibes, fondatrice du podcast.Répondant à cette publication, SNCF Voyageurs a assuré que “tous les enfants [étaient] les bienvenus à bord de [ses] trains” mais que la classe “Optimum” était pensée “pour les attentes spécifiques de nos clients professionnels”, soulignant que cela n’avait “rien d’une nouveauté”, puisque “c’était déjà le cas depuis des années” dans l’offre Business Première.Dans un contexte d’ouverture à la concurrence, la compétition entre l’entreprise publique et les nouveaux entrants sur le marché français comme Trenitalia se joue beaucoup sur la captation de la très rentable clientèle d’affaires.Mais les critiques ont continué à pleuvoir jeudi, en particulier des politiques de tous bords.”Une société qui préfère des espaces sans enfants plutôt que des espaces sans écran est une société malade”, a fustigé sur X le député LFI François Ruffin.Même constat pour Fabien Roussel (PCF) pour qui interdire des voitures aux enfants “normalise l’inacceptable”. “Un service public doit protéger, adapter, pas exclure, discriminer ou invisibiliser”, ajoute-t-il, également sur X.A l’autre côté du spectre politique, Bruno Retailleau (LR) juge qu'”exclure les enfants, c’est exclure l’avenir”, quand l’eurodéputée d’extrême droite Marion Maréchal y voit un “message anti-famille (…) lamentable” dans un moment “où notre pays a tellement besoin d’enfants”.En 2025, pour la première fois depuis 1945, le nombre de décès en France a été supérieur à celui des naissances. 645.000 bébés ont vu le jour, soit 2,1% de moins qu’en 2024 et 24% de moins qu’en 2010, selon l’Insee.Selon la députée Liot Constance de Pélichy, présidente d’une mission d’information sur la natalité, “le phénomène +no kids+ est en totale contradiction avec les enjeux démographiques, sociaux et sociétaux auxquels notre pays est confronté”.Sous l’avalanche, la SNCF qui se dit “très attachée” à ce que le train soit un “lieu de vie en commun ouvert à tous”, a reconnu une “formule marketing maladroite”, qui a été “retirée”.Les places Optimum ne représentent que 8% des places proposées, et seulement du lundi au vendredi, a-t-elle fait valoir. “92% des autres places sont proposées à tous et 100% les weekends”, a relevé Gaëlle Babault, directrice offres TGV Inoui, dans une vidéo sur les réseaux sociaux du groupe.La SNCF a aussi rappelé ses tarifications spéciales enfants et adolescents, ainsi que ses “espaces familles” proposés dans les TGV Inoui les weekends, jours fériés et jours de départs en vacances, “dans un espace où la nécessité de calme n’est pas essentielle pour ceux qui sont dans cette voiture”, sans préciser le pourcentage qu’ils représentaient.”Nous n’avons jamais accepté les nombreuses demandes de clients qui depuis longtemps réclament des voitures entières sans enfants, par exemple la 1re classe, dans les TGV Inoui”, faisait-elle valoir dans sa réponse à la publication sur Instagram.Pour défendre les enfants et les devoirs du service public face aux pressions commerciales liées à l’arrivée de la concurrence, la haut-commissaire à l’Enfance Sarah El Haïry a demandé à rencontrer le PDG de la SNCF Jean Castex. “Une société qui accueille bien ses enfants est une société qui va bien. Le train doit en être le reflet”, estime-t-elle, suggérant de penser l’offre Optimum “aussi pour les familles”.im-alh-mep-sac-hr/abb/LyS

With ‘Board of Peace,’ Trump tries hand at institution-making, to wide doubt

After a year of tearing down global norms and withdrawing from UN bodies, US President Donald Trump is trying his hand at international institution building with his self-styled “Board of Peace” — to wide skepticism.Unlike the United Nations, where every member has a say and five big powers wield vetoes, the nascent board is unambiguously led not just by the United States but personally by Trump, who will hold final say and can remain in charge past his presidency.Trump first conceived of the board for Gaza, where Israel and Hamas agreed to a US-backed ceasefire in October.But Trump quickly raised eyebrows by sending out wide invitations including to Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose Ukraine invasion Trump has failed to stop, and to countries far removed from traditional Middle East diplomacy.Launching the board at the World Economic Forum in the Swiss resort of Davos, Trump said the new body could “spread out to other things as we succeed with Gaza,” with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the “possibilities are endless.”Trump boasts of ending eight wars in his year back in office — a claim viewed by many as overstated — and has loudly complained about not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.In Davos, Trump said he envisioned his board playing a role “coupled with the United Nations” but again bashed the global institution, to which he has ordered major US cuts.”On the eight wars that I ended, I never spoke to the United Nations about any of them — and you would think that I should have,” he said.Also raising suspicion is the question of money, as Trump already faces allegations of self-enrichment from the presidency.The board’s charter says that members of the executive board will pay $1 billion for a permanent spot.A US official clarified that members would not have to fork over the massive sum for a temporary two-year stint on the board and promised “highest financial controls and oversight mechanisms,” although where the money will actually go remains unclear.- ‘Galaxy far, far away’ from reality -Major European nations have shunned the board, which is heavy on longstanding US partners in the Middle East, ideological allies of Trump and smaller countries eager for Trump’s attention.”This thing doesn’t have the bandwidth and doesn’t have the set of guiding principles that would enable serious countries to join,” said Aaron David Miller, a former US Middle East negotiator now at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.He said Trump felt emboldened after ordering the US raid that seized Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro on January 3, and was convinced that existing global institutions “don’t understand that the central driving feature of the international system today is US power.”The board is “tethered to a galaxy far, far away and not to the realities of conflict resolution back here on Planet Earth,” he said.Britain has historically been among the most eager to sign on to US initiatives, but Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said in a BBC interview there was a “huge amount of work to do” and questioned inviting Putin.France has made clear it will not join, leading Trump to threaten a 200 percent tariff on French wine unless President Emmanuel Macron joins the voluntary board.A group of Muslim-majority countries — Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates — welcomed the board but in a joint statement highlighted that it should be a “transitional administration” for Gaza.Richard Gowan, program director for global issues and institutions at the International Crisis Group, said the “Board of Peace” offered a sign of how Trump wants to pursue diplomacy in his remaining three years in office.”He seems to be putting the boot into existing multilateral institutions like the United Nations and switching to his own boutique organization that he can control completely,” Gowan said.But he noted that the board’s first task was Gaza, where Trump has proposed glitzy development but which lies in rubble with a fragile ceasefire.”If Gaza implodes, the Board won’t have a lot of credibility elsewhere.”

With ‘Board of Peace,’ Trump tries hand at institution-making, to wide doubt

After a year of tearing down global norms and withdrawing from UN bodies, US President Donald Trump is trying his hand at international institution building with his self-styled “Board of Peace” — to wide skepticism.Unlike the United Nations, where every member has a say and five big powers wield vetoes, the nascent board is unambiguously led not just by the United States but personally by Trump, who will hold final say and can remain in charge past his presidency.Trump first conceived of the board for Gaza, where Israel and Hamas agreed to a US-backed ceasefire in October.But Trump quickly raised eyebrows by sending out wide invitations including to Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose Ukraine invasion Trump has failed to stop, and to countries far removed from traditional Middle East diplomacy.Launching the board at the World Economic Forum in the Swiss resort of Davos, Trump said the new body could “spread out to other things as we succeed with Gaza,” with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the “possibilities are endless.”Trump boasts of ending eight wars in his year back in office — a claim viewed by many as overstated — and has loudly complained about not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.In Davos, Trump said he envisioned his board playing a role “coupled with the United Nations” but again bashed the global institution, to which he has ordered major US cuts.”On the eight wars that I ended, I never spoke to the United Nations about any of them — and you would think that I should have,” he said.Also raising suspicion is the question of money, as Trump already faces allegations of self-enrichment from the presidency.The board’s charter says that members of the executive board will pay $1 billion for a permanent spot.A US official clarified that members would not have to fork over the massive sum for a temporary two-year stint on the board and promised “highest financial controls and oversight mechanisms,” although where the money will actually go remains unclear.- ‘Galaxy far, far away’ from reality -Major European nations have shunned the board, which is heavy on longstanding US partners in the Middle East, ideological allies of Trump and smaller countries eager for Trump’s attention.”This thing doesn’t have the bandwidth and doesn’t have the set of guiding principles that would enable serious countries to join,” said Aaron David Miller, a former US Middle East negotiator now at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.He said Trump felt emboldened after ordering the US raid that seized Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro on January 3, and was convinced that existing global institutions “don’t understand that the central driving feature of the international system today is US power.”The board is “tethered to a galaxy far, far away and not to the realities of conflict resolution back here on Planet Earth,” he said.Britain has historically been among the most eager to sign on to US initiatives, but Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said in a BBC interview there was a “huge amount of work to do” and questioned inviting Putin.France has made clear it will not join, leading Trump to threaten a 200 percent tariff on French wine unless President Emmanuel Macron joins the voluntary board.A group of Muslim-majority countries — Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Egypt, Jordan, Indonesia, Pakistan, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates — welcomed the board but in a joint statement highlighted that it should be a “transitional administration” for Gaza.Richard Gowan, program director for global issues and institutions at the International Crisis Group, said the “Board of Peace” offered a sign of how Trump wants to pursue diplomacy in his remaining three years in office.”He seems to be putting the boot into existing multilateral institutions like the United Nations and switching to his own boutique organization that he can control completely,” Gowan said.But he noted that the board’s first task was Gaza, where Trump has proposed glitzy development but which lies in rubble with a fragile ceasefire.”If Gaza implodes, the Board won’t have a lot of credibility elsewhere.”

Lait infantile: deux enquêtes ouvertes après la mort suspecte de deux nourrissons

Deux enquêtes distinctes ont été ouvertes à Angers et Bordeaux après les décès récents de deux nourrissons ayant consommé un lait infantile rappelé par Nestlé pour cause de “possible contamination” par une substance d’origine bactérienne, sans “lien de causalité” établi pour l’heure, selon les autorités.Un premier décès suspect, évoqué sans précisions de lieu mardi par l’un des services du ministère de la Santé qui a lancé des investigations sanitaires, concerne un bébé né le 25 décembre et mort le 8 janvier à l’hôpital Haut Lévêque de Pessac, dans la banlieue de Bordeaux.”Une fois sorti de la maternité, le nourrisson avait notamment été alimenté, entre le 5 et le 7 janvier 2026, avec un lait artificiel de marque Guigoz ayant fait l’objet d’un rappel pour une possible contamination par une bactérie Bacillus Cereus”, a précisé à l’AFP Renaud Gaudeul, procureur de la République à Bordeaux.A Angers, “il y a deux jours”, la mère d’une petite fille de 27 jours, morte le 23 décembre, a recontacté les enquêteurs pour évoquer une boîte de lait Guigoz donnée auparavant à son bébé, a indiqué jeudi soir le procureur de la ville, Eric Brouillard.”C’est une piste sérieuse” mais il est “beaucoup trop tôt pour dire que c’est la piste principale”, a souligné M. Brouillard, qui a saisi “en urgence” un laboratoire.Le 5 janvier, Nestlé, géant suisse de l’agroalimentaire, avait engagé un vaste rappel de laits infantiles des marques Guigoz et Nidal à cause de la présence potentielle de “céréulide” dans ces produits pourtant très contrôlés.Ce composant toxique, produit dans certaines conditions par une famille de bactéries, les Bacillus cereus, peut causer d’importants vomissements dans les heures suivant sa consommation.- Alerte sanitaire “d’ampleur” -A Bordeaux, le bébé victime avait été conduit en urgence à l’hôpital le 7 janvier, “la mère ayant constaté des troubles digestifs chez l’enfant”, selon le procureur, Renaud Gaudeul.Les premiers résultats d’analyses diligentées par l’enquête “ont établi l’absence de contamination par la bactérie Bacillus Cereus”, mais “des analyses complémentaires” ont été demandées pour retrouver la toxine céreulide, a complété M. Gaudeul plus tard dans la soirée.Les résultats de ces nouvelles analyses, “plus longues”, “ne sont pas encore connus”, a-t-il précisé.Dans un communiqué, les ministères de l’Agriculture et de la Santé ont évoqué jeudi une alerte sanitaire “d’ampleur, qui reste évolutive”, assurant déployer une “surveillance continue” du dossier.”À ce stade, il n’a pas été mis en évidence de lien de causalité entre la consommation des laits infantiles concernés et la survenue de symptômes chez des nourrissons”, ont-ils fait valoir.- Fournisseur chinois -“La conjonction des deux choses n’est pas établie, c’est ça que l’enquête va déterminer”, a confirmé la ministre de l’Agriculture, Annie Genevard, en déplacement dans la Manche, disant suivre le dossier “avec très grande vigilance”.”Il est de la responsabilité des entreprises de réaliser des contrôles et de rappeler les lots contaminés”, a-t-elle insisté.Le rappel diligenté par Nestlé concerne une soixantaine de pays parmi lesquels la France, et le patron du géant suisse, Philipp Navratil, a présenté des excuses à la mi-janvier, alors que le groupe est accusé par certaines ONG d’avoir tardé à prendre des mesures.Mercredi, le groupe français Lactalis a également annoncé un vaste rappel de lait infantile dans plusieurs pays, notamment la France, la Chine, l’Australie et le Mexique. Selon les ministères de l’Agriculture et de la Santé, ce retrait est, comme pour celui de Nestlé, lié à un ingrédient soupçonné d’être source de la contamination, “une huile riche en acide arachidonique utile au bon développement des bébés, produite par un fournisseur chinois”.”À ce jour, l’ensemble des fabricants de lait infantile au niveau mondial, dès lors qu’ils ont eu recours à de l’huile riche en acide arachidonique de ce fournisseur, doivent conduire une analyse de risque leur permettant d’évaluer la sécurité de chacun des lots”, ajoutent-ils.L’ONG Foodwatch a annoncé mercredi porter plainte contre X pour “faire la lumière” sur ces rappels, affirmant que “des millions de nourrissons dans le monde étaient concernés”.pgr-jdy-mdz-aro-kal-jed-mb-tsq/gf/bfi