China likely to bid on building new Panama Canal ports

China is among parties interested in bidding to build two new ports on the Panama Canal, its administrator said Tuesday, despite US talk of retaking control of the vital trade route.US President Donald Trump made the threat earlier this year, alleging that China controls the strategic waterway because Hong Kong-based CK Hutchison Holdings operates existing ports at either end — Cristobal on the Atlantic, and Balboa on the Pacific.The firm agreed in March to transfer control of both ports to a conglomerate led by US-based BlackRock, but the deal — viewed with suspicion by China — has not been finalized.  The Central American country is hoping to attract $8.5 billion in investment over the next decade to expand port capacity, and to build a gas pipeline and a new reservoir, among other projects.In addition to new ports, the project envisions the construction of a gas pipeline and a new reservoir.”We have to be open to participation of all interested parties,” and solicit “the broadest possible competition,” canal administrator Ricaurte Vasquez told journalists. He said all parties would bid on an equal footing.He declined to speculate about a possible increase in tensions with the United States if the projects were awarded to Chinese firms in the future.The Panama Canal Authority, which has begun meeting with interested parties ahead of the bidding process, plans to award contracts for the two terminals in late 2026 and begin operations in 2029.Hong Kong’s Cosco Shipping Ports and Orient Overseas Container Line (OOCL) are among international players that have expressed interest — along with Singapore’s PSA International, Taiwan’s Evergreen, German Hapag Lloyd, Denmark’s Maersk and France’s CMA Terminals.Panama’s five main ports are all located near the canal and are operated by concessionaires from the United States, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore.The 80-kilometer canal is used mainly by the United States and China and carries five percent of the world’s maritime trade.The United States built and operated the Panama Canal for a century before handing control to Panama on the last day of 1999.

Bygmalion: la Cour de cassation va dire si la condamnation de Sarkozy est définitive

La Cour de cassation se prononce mercredi sur le pourvoi de Nicolas Sarkozy dans l’affaire Bygmalion, faisant peser le couperet d’une deuxième condamnation pénale définitive au-dessus de l’ex-président, qui affrontera au printemps le procès libyen en appel.Passée au second plan avec l’incarcération de l’ancien chef de l’État à la prison parisienne de la Santé, cette procédure en cassation, qui a suspendu la peine prononcée à son encontre, est l’ultime recours en droit français dans ce dossier.Si la Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi, comme l’a préconisé l’avocate générale à l’audience du 8 octobre, l’affaire Bygmalion deviendra la deuxième condamnation pénale définitive au casier judiciaire de Nicolas Sarkozy, après celle de l’affaire des écoutes.En revanche, si elle reconnaît le bien-fondé de la requête, la plus haute juridiction française, qui juge le seul respect du droit et non le fond des dossiers, pourrait ordonner un nouveau procès.Dans l’affaire Bygmalion, Nicolas Sarkozy a été condamné le 14 février 2024 par la cour d’appel de Paris à un an d’emprisonnement dont six mois ferme pour le financement illégal de sa campagne présidentielle perdue de 2012.Dans ce dossier, les investigations ont révélé que, pour masquer l’explosion des dépenses de sa campagne – près de 43 millions d’euros pour un maximum autorisé de 22,5 millions -, un système de double facturation avait été mis en place imputant à l’UMP (devenue LR), sous couvert de conventions fictives, une grosse partie du coût des meetings.Contrairement à ses coprévenus, l’ex-chef de l’État n’était pas mis en cause pour ce système de fausses factures mais comme bénéficiaire, en tant que candidat, d’un financement politique illégal.En première instance comme en appel, Nicolas Sarkozy a contesté “vigoureusement toute responsabilité pénale”, dénonçant “fables” et “mensonges”.Sa peine en appel, dont la cour avait ordonné l’aménagement pour la partie ferme (bracelet électronique, semi-liberté…), était légèrement inférieure à celle d’un an d’emprisonnement ferme prononcée en première instance en 2021.- Perspectives judiciaires -Trois des dix condamnés en appel du procès Bygmalion se sont joints au pourvoi: le directeur de campagne, Guillaume Lambert, et les ex-cadres de l’UMP Eric Cesari et Pierre Chassat.En décembre 2024, la Cour de cassation avait déjà rendu définitive la condamnation de Nicolas Sarkozy à un an d’emprisonnement ferme sous bracelet électronique pour corruption et trafic d’influence dans l’affaire des écoutes, également appelée Bismuth.L’ancien champion de la droite, aujourd’hui âgé de 70 ans, l’a porté entre février et mai, avant l’obtention d’une libération conditionnelle avant mi-peine, notamment en raison de son âge.Une nouvelle condamnation définitive pourrait compliquer encore davantage les perspectives judiciaires de Nicolas Sarkzoy, qui se prépare pour le procès en appel du dossier libyen prévu du 16 mars au 3 juin.Le 25 septembre, le tribunal correctionnel de Paris l’a condamné à cinq ans de prison pour avoir sciemment laissé ses collaborateurs démarcher la Libye du dictateur Mouammar Kadhafi pour solliciter un financement occulte de sa campagne présidentielle victorieuse de 2007.Pour déterminer sa peine, le tribunal de Paris avait tenu compte de l’affaire des écoutes, reprochant dans son jugement à M. Sarkozy d’avoir “relativisé cette condamnation” en “minimisant la gravité des faits”, mais avait en revanche écarté la condamnation Bygmalion en raison de son caractère non-définitif.Nicolas Sarkozy, qui clame son innocence, a été incarcéré pendant trois semaines à la Santé, une détention inédite pour un ex-président dans l’histoire de la République française et qui a suscité de vifs débats.La cour d’appel de Paris l’a remis en liberté sous contrôle judiciaire le 10 novembre. L’ex-président va relater cette expérience carcérale dans un livre, “Le Journal d’un prisonnier”, qui paraîtra un mois exactement après sa sortie de prison.

Bygmalion: la Cour de cassation va dire si la condamnation de Sarkozy est définitive

La Cour de cassation se prononce mercredi sur le pourvoi de Nicolas Sarkozy dans l’affaire Bygmalion, faisant peser le couperet d’une deuxième condamnation pénale définitive au-dessus de l’ex-président, qui affrontera au printemps le procès libyen en appel.Passée au second plan avec l’incarcération de l’ancien chef de l’État à la prison parisienne de la Santé, cette procédure en cassation, qui a suspendu la peine prononcée à son encontre, est l’ultime recours en droit français dans ce dossier.Si la Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi, comme l’a préconisé l’avocate générale à l’audience du 8 octobre, l’affaire Bygmalion deviendra la deuxième condamnation pénale définitive au casier judiciaire de Nicolas Sarkozy, après celle de l’affaire des écoutes.En revanche, si elle reconnaît le bien-fondé de la requête, la plus haute juridiction française, qui juge le seul respect du droit et non le fond des dossiers, pourrait ordonner un nouveau procès.Dans l’affaire Bygmalion, Nicolas Sarkozy a été condamné le 14 février 2024 par la cour d’appel de Paris à un an d’emprisonnement dont six mois ferme pour le financement illégal de sa campagne présidentielle perdue de 2012.Dans ce dossier, les investigations ont révélé que, pour masquer l’explosion des dépenses de sa campagne – près de 43 millions d’euros pour un maximum autorisé de 22,5 millions -, un système de double facturation avait été mis en place imputant à l’UMP (devenue LR), sous couvert de conventions fictives, une grosse partie du coût des meetings.Contrairement à ses coprévenus, l’ex-chef de l’État n’était pas mis en cause pour ce système de fausses factures mais comme bénéficiaire, en tant que candidat, d’un financement politique illégal.En première instance comme en appel, Nicolas Sarkozy a contesté “vigoureusement toute responsabilité pénale”, dénonçant “fables” et “mensonges”.Sa peine en appel, dont la cour avait ordonné l’aménagement pour la partie ferme (bracelet électronique, semi-liberté…), était légèrement inférieure à celle d’un an d’emprisonnement ferme prononcée en première instance en 2021.- Perspectives judiciaires -Trois des dix condamnés en appel du procès Bygmalion se sont joints au pourvoi: le directeur de campagne, Guillaume Lambert, et les ex-cadres de l’UMP Eric Cesari et Pierre Chassat.En décembre 2024, la Cour de cassation avait déjà rendu définitive la condamnation de Nicolas Sarkozy à un an d’emprisonnement ferme sous bracelet électronique pour corruption et trafic d’influence dans l’affaire des écoutes, également appelée Bismuth.L’ancien champion de la droite, aujourd’hui âgé de 70 ans, l’a porté entre février et mai, avant l’obtention d’une libération conditionnelle avant mi-peine, notamment en raison de son âge.Une nouvelle condamnation définitive pourrait compliquer encore davantage les perspectives judiciaires de Nicolas Sarkzoy, qui se prépare pour le procès en appel du dossier libyen prévu du 16 mars au 3 juin.Le 25 septembre, le tribunal correctionnel de Paris l’a condamné à cinq ans de prison pour avoir sciemment laissé ses collaborateurs démarcher la Libye du dictateur Mouammar Kadhafi pour solliciter un financement occulte de sa campagne présidentielle victorieuse de 2007.Pour déterminer sa peine, le tribunal de Paris avait tenu compte de l’affaire des écoutes, reprochant dans son jugement à M. Sarkozy d’avoir “relativisé cette condamnation” en “minimisant la gravité des faits”, mais avait en revanche écarté la condamnation Bygmalion en raison de son caractère non-définitif.Nicolas Sarkozy, qui clame son innocence, a été incarcéré pendant trois semaines à la Santé, une détention inédite pour un ex-président dans l’histoire de la République française et qui a suscité de vifs débats.La cour d’appel de Paris l’a remis en liberté sous contrôle judiciaire le 10 novembre. L’ex-président va relater cette expérience carcérale dans un livre, “Le Journal d’un prisonnier”, qui paraîtra un mois exactement après sa sortie de prison.

Adapt or die: Latin America’s response to Trump

Latin America has navigated a minefield of economic and military coercion since Donald Trump’s return to the White House.Some leaders have fought back, some acquiesced. Some played possum.No country was left untouched by what many view as a return to US interventionism in what the Trump administration has taken to calling “our hemisphere.””Every Latin American country has a position of asymmetry with the United States. That is a baseline position,” said Alejandro Frenkel, international relations professor at Argentina’s San Martin University.Here is an overview of the tumult — and the varying responses:- ‘Whatever Trump wants’ -At one extreme, ideological ally Javier Milei of Argentina “does whatever Trump does and whatever Trump wants,” analyst Michael Shifter of the Inter-American Dialogue think tank in Washington told AFP.In desperate need of a powerful backer in his efforts to revive a long-ailing economy, Milei has been a vocal Trump cheerleader and has offered US manufacturers preferential access to the Argentine market.Trump lifted restrictions on Argentinian beef imports in a reciprocal deal and gave the country a multi-billion dollar lifeline.Also firmly in the Trump camp is gang-busting President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador — the first country to accept hundreds of migrants expelled under the second Trump administration.Rights groups said the men were tortured, but Bukele won concessions including a temporary reprieve for over 200,000 Salvadorans to live and work in the United States and send home much-needed dollar remittances.In Ecuador, President Daniel Noboa agreed to receive deported migrants and praised Trump’s military deployment and bombing of alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and Pacific.Noboa won closer US cooperation in his own fight on gangs.- ‘Rude and ignorant’ -Colombia’s leftist leader Gustavo Petro has openly clashed with Trump, calling him “rude and ignorant” and comparing him to Adolf Hitler.Petro repeatedly denounced the Trump administration’s treatment of migrants and the “extrajudicial executions” of more than 80 people in strikes on alleged drug boats.He joined China’s Belt and Road infrastructure Initiative as he positioned Colombia closer to Beijing.The Trump administration has responded by accusing Petro of drug trafficking and imposing sanctions.Trump removed Bogota from a list of allies in the fight against narco trafficking, but the country escaped harsher punishment — possibly as Washington awaits the right’s likely return in 2026 elections.Fellow leftist Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva of Brazil has also tussled with Trump.But he is more “pragmatic and firm,” says Oliver Stuenkel, an international relations professor at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in Sao Paulo. Lula denounced foreign “interference” after Trump imposed punishing import tariffs on Brazil in retaliation for the coup trial against his right-wing ally Jair Bolsonaro.Twenty-five years ago, when the United States was its main trading partner, “Brazil would have had to make significant concessions,” said Stuenkel. But “Brazil now exports more to China than to the United States and Europe combined.” – ‘Silent diplomacy’ – Mexico’s President Claudia Sheinbaum has fewer options. Her country sends more than 80 percent of its exports to the United States, with which she is renegotiating a trade agreement.Sheinbaum has responded to Trump’s often harsh rhetoric about Mexican drug cartels and migration with what analysts dub “silent diplomacy” — hashing out issues behind closed doors.The president upped intelligence sharing, drug seizures and arrests of cartel leaders, and has escaped the worst of Trump’s tariff wrath.But she stood firm, insisting there can be no “subordination,” after Trump mulled military strikes on drug sites in Mexico.Also walking a tightrope is Panama’s President Jose Raul Mulino, who under US pressure withdrew his country from China’s Belt and Road Initiative.He also allowed the sale of ports owned by a Hong-Kong-based conglomerate on the Panama Canal, which Trump had threatened the United States would be “taking back.”- No provocation -In its own category is Venezuela, which fears that a large-scale US naval deployment in the Caribbean is aimed at ousting President Nicolas Maduro.The Venezuelan strongman is widely regarded as having stolen two re-elections and has few allies or economic backers.Under pressure, Caracas agreed to free American prisoners as Washington allowed Chevron to continue operations in the country with the world’s biggest known oil reserves.Venezuela has shifted to readiness mode in the face of the military buildup.But the Venezuelans are “trying hard not to provoke the US,” said Guillaume Long, a senior research fellow at the Washington-based Center for Economic and Policy Research and a former Ecuadoran foreign minister.

Asian stocks extend global rally as data boost rate cut hopes

Asia extended a global equities rally Wednesday after another round of tepid US data reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates again next month.A report that US President Donald Trump’s top economic aide was the frontrunner to be the central bank’s next boss added to the risk-on mood as investors rediscovered their mojo after a recent stutter.Bets that officials will lower borrowing costs at their December meeting have surged this week after a number of key members of the policy board said they backed a third successive cut as fears about the labour market overshadowed still-high inflation.And a fresh batch of reports on the world’s top economy  — some delayed by the government shutdown — provided fresh ammunition to those calling for more easing.Payroll firm ADP said the four weeks to November 8 saw private employers shed an average 13,500 jobs per week, while official figures showed retail sales rose slower in September than August and less than expected. Meanwhile, the Conference Board’s consumer confidence index dropped to its lowest level in seven months, with shoppers expressing greater worry about labour market conditions and the outlook for household incomes.Analysts said the reading was particularly a concern ahead of the holiday spending period.The Labor Department also said wholesale inflation picked up in September but in line with forecasts.However, the rise was driven by a big jump in goods prices, highlighting the steeper costs that businesses face.”The shutdown backlog released an avalanche of extremely stale prints: ADP soft, retail sales weaker, Core PPI tame, Richmond Fed grim, consumer confidence dismal,” wrote Stephen Innes at SPI Asset Management.”None of it is current, none of it is forward-looking. But in a market starving for macro inputs, even freezer-burnt data tastes dovish. Goldman’s economists shaved third-quarter GDP tracking to 3.7 percent, reinforcing the narrative that growth is cooling right into the December (policy board) window.”The chances of a more dovish Fed were also given a boost after Bloomberg reported that Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, was considered the leading candidate to take the lead at the Fed when Jerome Powell’s term ends next year. Hassett is a close ally of the president and Bloomberg said he was seen as someone who would back rate-cut calls by Trump, who has regularly slammed Powell for not taking such action early enough. “Hassett is viewed as closely aligned with President Trump’s preference for lower interest rates, and his appointment would likely reinforce the administration’s push for easier policy,” said National Australia Bank’s Rodrigo Catril.Wall Street’s three main indexes enjoyed a third day of healthy gains, and Asia again followed suit.Tokyo and Seoul gained around two percent, while Hong Kong, Shanghai, Sydney, Singapore, Taipei and Wellington also chalked up healthy advances.The gains come after a pullback on trading floors for much of November owing to worries about lofty valuations, particularly among tech firms, with some questioning the wisdom of the vast sums of cash invested in the artificial intelligence sector.In corporate news, Chinese ecommerce titan Alibaba dropped more than one percent after reporting a fall in profit linked to consumer subsidies and the building of data centres to deal with its AI ambitions.- Key figures at around 0230 GMT -Tokyo – Nikkei 225: UP 1.9 percent at 49,605.57 (break)Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: UP 0.6 percent at 26,054.70Shanghai – Composite: UP 0.2 percent at 3,876.05Euro/dollar: UP at $1.1583 from $1.1570 on TuesdayPound/dollar: UP at $1.3191 from $1.3165Dollar/yen: DOWN at 155.82 yen from 155.97 yenEuro/pound: DOWN at 87.81 pence from 87.86 penceWest Texas Intermediate: UP 0.2 percent at $58.06 per barrelBrent North Sea Crude: UP 0.2 percent at $62.62 per barrelNew York – Dow: UP 1.4 percent at 47,112.45 (close) London – FTSE 100: UP 0.8 percent at 9,609.53 (close)

How China leveraged its rare earths dominance over the US

China’s stranglehold on the rare earths industry — from natural reserves and mining through processing and innovation — is the result of a decades-long drive, now giving Beijing crucial leverage in its trade war with the United States.The 17 key elements will play a vital role in the global economy in coming years, as analysts warn that plans to secure alternative supply chains by Western governments could take years to bear fruit.Rare earths are crucial for the defence sector — used in fighter jets, missile guidance systems and radar technology — while also having a range of uses in everyday products including smartphones, medical equipment and automobiles.Visited this month by AFP, the southeastern mining region of Ganzhou — which specialises in “heavy” rare earths including yttrium and terbium — was a hive of activity.Media access to the secretive industry is rarely granted in China, but despite near-constant surveillance by unidentified minders, AFP journalists saw dozens of trucks driving in and out of one rare earths mine, in addition to several bustling processing facilities.Sprawling new headquarters are being built in Ganzhou for China Rare Earth Group, one of the country’s two largest state-owned companies in the industry following years of consolidation directed by Beijing.Challenges this year have “paved the way for more countries to look into expanding rare earth metal production and processing”, Heron Lim, economics lecturer at ESSEC Business School, told AFP.”This investment could pay longer-term dividends,” he said.- Trade war -Sweeping export restrictions China imposed on the sector in early October sent shockwaves across global manufacturing sectors.The curbs raised alarm bells in Washington, which has been engaged in a renewed trade war with Beijing since President Donald Trump began his second term.At a high-stakes meeting in South Korea late last month, Trump and Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping agreed to a one-year truce in a blistering tariff war between the world’s top two economies.The deal — which guarantees supply of rare earths and other critical minerals, at least temporarily — effectively neutralised the most punishing US measures and was widely seen as a victory for Beijing.”Rare earths are likely to remain at the centre of future Sino-US economic negotiations despite the tentative agreements thus far,” Heron Lim told AFP.”China has demonstrated its willingness to use more trade levers to keep the United States at the negotiating table,” he said.”The turbulence has created a challenging environment for producers that rely on various rare earth metals, as near-term supply is uncertain.”Washington and its allies are now racing to develop alternative mining and processing chains, but experts warn that process will take years.- Supremacy ceded -During the Cold War, the United States led the way in developing abilities to extract and process rare earths, with the Mountain Pass mine in California providing the bulk of global supplies.But as tensions with Moscow eased and the substantial environmental toll wrought by the rare earth industry gained prominence, the United States gradually offshored capacity in the 1980s and 1990s.Now, China controls most of global rare earths mining — around two thirds, by most estimates.It is already home to the world’s largest natural reserves of the elements of any country, according to geological surveys.And it has a near total monopoly on separation and refining, with analysis this year showing a share of around nine tenths of all global processing.Furthermore, a commanding lead in patents and strict export controls on processing technology solidify efforts by Beijing to prevent know-how from leaving the country.”The United States and the European Union are heavily reliant on imports of rare earth elements, underscoring significant risks to critical industries,” said Amelia Haines, commodities analyst at BMI, at a seminar this month.”This sustained risk is likely to catalyse a faster, broader pivot towards rare earth security,” she said.- Chasing alternatives -US defence authorities have in recent years directed large sums towards shoring up domestic production — part of efforts to achieve a “mine-to-magnet” supply chain by 2027.Washington has also been working with allies to develop extraction and processing alternatives to China.Trump signed a rare earths deal last month promising $8.5 billion in critical minerals projects with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese of Australia — its vast territory home to extensive rare earth resources.The US president also signed cooperation deals covering the critical minerals sector last month with Japan, Malaysia and Thailand.Despite the flurry of activity and headlines this year, Washington has been aware of its rare earths problem for years.In 2010, a maritime territorial dispute with Tokyo prompted Beijing to suspend shipments of the minerals to Japan — the first major incident highlighting geopolitical ramifications of China’s control over the sector.The episode sparked calls by the administration of then-president Barack Obama to shore up US domestic resilience in the strategic field.But 15 years later, China remains the chief rare earths power.

US lawmaker’s exit widens Republican fault lines

Marjorie Taylor Greene didn’t just resign from the US Congress — she detonated a political grenade on her way out, blasting open cracks in a dam that some fear could unleash a flood of Republican exits.The 51-year-old conservative provocateur stunned Washington last week with a blistering attack on President Donald Trump’s second-term agenda and the Republican leadership she accused of betraying voters. Her departure announcement immediately fueled talk that more exhausted or exasperated Republicans may follow — a dangerous prospect for a House of Representatives majority hanging by a thread.”The honeymoon’s over and some Republicans are realizing this isn’t what they signed up for,” political analyst Andrew Koneschusky, a former Senate staffer, told AFP.”The discontent is multifaceted — everything from the growing affordability crisis to the ongoing Epstein saga, the impact of trade wars, the concentration of executive power, the diminution of congressional power and the toxicity in our political discourse.”Greene’s four-page resignation read more like a manifesto than a farewell, blasting Trump, skewering Speaker Mike Johnson and denouncing a “Political Industrial Complex” serving elites while ordinary Americans struggle. Washington, she argued, isn’t gridlocked — it’s rotten: lawmakers face violent threats while serious legislation gathers dust, replaced by meaningless messaging bills and party loyalty tests.Johnson, she charged in a separate post, has “sidelined” Congress in “full obedience” to the White House, blocking votes on bills and smothering campaign promises made by Trump. – ‘Tinder box’ -Her critics have long branded her a chaos agent, but this time Greene’s fury is resonating. Indiana Republican Victoria Spartz posted that she couldn’t blame Greene for fleeing “an institution that has betrayed the American people.” Already, 41 House members plan to retire this term — unusually high halfway through — and Punchbowl News reported that more could follow as Republican lawmakers complain behind closed doors of being treated like “garbage.””More explosive early resignations are coming. It’s a tinder box,” said one, according to the politics news outlet. “Morale has never been lower.”The math is brutal: House Republicans hold a slim 219–213 majority even before Greene’s departure, and Democrats are eyeing an upset in next month’s special election in Tennessee. They should also pick up seats in Texas and New Jersey.Rank-and-file lawmakers have worked only a handful of days since July despite a $174,000 salary, and say they spend more time when they are in Washington on punitive resolutions and theatrics than governing. Frustration is now erupting in a surprising place: “discharge petitions,” an obscure tool allowing lawmakers to circumvent the leadership and force votes with 218 signatures. Once rare, they’ve become the rebellion weapon of choice. Last week, four Republicans defied Trump and Johnson to demand the release of documents on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Five discharge petitions have succeeded under Johnson — more than in the previous 30 years combined.- ‘Go along or get out’ -Meanwhile, the temperature in Congress is rising in more ways than one. Threats against lawmakers have surged, a situation that some say has worsened since the recent assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Greene and Democrat Jared Golden both cited rising political violence as reasons for stepping aside.Zoom out, and the picture looks even bleaker. Public trust is cratering: Pew reported in 2023 that only 26 percent of Americans view Congress favorably. The last Congress passed the fewest bills in decades. Oversight has also weakened, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center, with fewer hearings, thinner witness testimony and implementation of watchdog recommendations increasingly spotty.”This is one of the toughest environments to be a lawmaker. If you’re a Democrat, you’re out of power and there’s only so much you can do,” said Koneschusky.”If you’re a Republican, you can’t exercise independent policy or political judgment without risking retribution from the administration. Many Republicans seem to feel there are only two choices: go along or get out of the game.”

Popemobile transformed into Gaza mobile children’s clinic

The popemobile used by the late pope Francis on his 2014 visit to Bethlehem re-emerged on Tuesday as a mobile children’s clinic to be deployed in Gaza.The vehicle is still unmistakeable as a popemobile: pristine white inside and out, and with the familiar raised canopy.But instead of transporting the leader of the world’s 1.4 billion Roman Catholics, the re-branded “Vehicle of Hope” is now set to serve in the war-battered Gaza Strip, in accordance with the late pope’s wishes.It was unveiled in Bethlehem in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, around the corner from the Church of the Nativity and Manger Square, where preparations are well underway for Christmas.”The Vehicle of Hope is ready for its new mission,” Cardinal Anders Arborelius, the Bishop of Stockholm, told a press conference, after blessing the vehicle.”We want every child we reach to feel seen, heard and protected. The rights and well-being of the child come first.”This vehicle stands as a testament: the world has not forgotten the children of Gaza.”This is not just a vehicle: it’s a message of compassion, dignity and hope.”Staffed by medics, the popemobile is intended for performing triage and is equipped for examination, diagnosis and treatment, including vaccines, stitches and tests for infections.The clinic should be able to perform up to 200 consultations a day. The children will sit in the pontiff’s chair while being attended to.- Pope’s ‘final wish’ -In May 2014, Francis visited Amman, Bethlehem and Jerusalem, on his second international visit as pontiff. The popemobile was used as he toured Bethlehem, greeting the crowds gathered in Manger Square.A gift from the Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas, the converted Mitsubishi was later given to Franciscan friars.Pope Francis died on April 21 aged 88, and his final wish for Gaza’s children was that the popemobile should become a mobile health unit, the official Vatican News portal said in May.The vehicle was transformed by Caritas, the Catholic humanitarian aid organisation. Costing $15,000, it has been repurposed and spruced up by Palestinian mechanics. The open sides have been screened off.”The children of Gaza were very close to the heart of pope Francis,” said Peter Brune, secretary general of the Caritas Sweden branch.”They will sit on the seat of the pope, and be treated like the most valuable person on Earth.”However, there is no date yet as to when it might receive Israeli authorisation to enter Gaza, where a fragile truce between Israel and Hamas came into effect on October 10 after two years of war that devastated healthcare in the Palestinian territory.”As with all humanitarian assistance, we urgently need access to Gaza,” Caritas secretary general Alistair Dutton told AFP.”We’re working through the official channels to get this in as quickly as possible.”