US presses missile issue as new Iran talks to open in Geneva

The United States and Iran are set to hold indirect talks in Switzerland on Thursday aiming to strike a deal to avert fresh conflict and bring an end to weeks of threats.The new round of negotiations in Geneva comes after the US carried out a massive military build-up in the region and President Donald Trump repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if a deal is not reached.In his State of the Union address on Tuesday, Trump accused Iran of “pursuing sinister nuclear ambitions”.He also claimed Tehran had “already developed missiles that can threaten Europe and our bases overseas, and they’re working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America”.The Iranian foreign ministry called these claims “big lies”.The maximum range of Iran’s missiles is 2,000 kilometres (1,200 miles) according to what Tehran has publicly disclosed. However the US Congressional Research Service estimates they top out at about 3,000 kilometres — less than a third of the distance to the continental United States.The dispute between the countries mostly revolves around Iran’s nuclear programme, which the West believes is aimed at building an atomic bomb but Tehran insists is peaceful.However the US has also been pushing to discuss Iran’s ballistic missile programme, as well as Tehran’s support for armed groups hostile towards Israel.Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that Iran must also negotiate on its missile programme, calling Tehran’s refusal to discuss ballistic weapons “a big, big problem” on the eve of the talks.He followed up by saying “the president wants diplomatic solutions”.Iran has taken anything beyond the nuclear issue off the negotiating table and has demanded that the US sanctions crippling its economy be part of any agreement.- ‘Neither war nor peace’ -Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Wednesday he had a “favourable outlook for the negotiations” that could finally “move beyond this ‘neither war nor peace’ situation”.Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who is leading the Iranian delegation at the talks, has called them “a historic opportunity”, adding that a deal was “within reach”.In a foreign ministry statement that followed a meeting with his Oman counterpart, Araghchi said the success of the US negotiations depend “on the seriousness of the other side and its avoidance of contradictory behaviour and positions”.The US will be represented by envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka.The two countries held talks earlier this month in Oman, which is mediating the negotiations, then gathered for a second round in Geneva last week.A previous attempt at negotiations collapsed when Israel launched surprise strikes on Iran last June, beginning a 12-day war that Washington briefly joined to bomb Iranian nuclear sites.In January, fresh tensions between the US and Iran emerged after Tehran engaged in a bloody crackdown on widespread protests that have posed one of the greatest challenges to the Islamic republic since its inception.Trump has threatened several times to intervene to “help” the Iranian people.Emile Hokayem, senior fellow for Middle East security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said that “the region seems to expect a war at this point”.In January, there was “a big push by a number of Middle Eastern states to convince the US not to” strike Iran.”But there’s a lot of apprehension at this point, because the expectation is that this time” a war would be “bigger” than the one in June.Tehran residents who spoke to AFP were divided as to whether there would be renewed conflict.Homemaker Tayebeh noted that Trump had “said that war would be very bad for Iran”.”There would be famine and people would suffer a lot. People are suffering now, but at least with war, our fate might be clear,” the 60-year-old said.

Post-uprising polls won’t shake Nepal’s delicate India-China balance

Nepal votes next week for the first time since deadly anti-corruption protests toppled the government, but analysts say any winner will likely maintain the delicate diplomatic balance between its two giant neighbours, India and China.The landlocked Himalayan nation of 30 million people will elect a new government on March 5, six months after youth-led demonstrations brought down the administration of Marxist leader KP Sharma Oli.Who will win is an open question, but Nepali journalist Sudheer Sharma said it will likely be “very difficult” for any single party to secure a majority, meaning longstanding political dynamics may continue.”Nepal’s relation with India or China depends on what type of coalition it will be and who will be the dominant power,” said Sharma.”The fundamentals of the relationship will not change, but some approaches might.”Younger candidates are campaigning on promises to overhaul a stagnant economy and remove an ageing political elite, while veteran politicians emphasise stability and security if returned to power.Key investors and trading partners Beijing and New Delhi are watching closely, but analysts suggested that the new government will likely continue Kathmandu’s pragmatic balancing act between the two powers, who compete for influence.Nepal’s largest trading partner is India, accounting for 63 percent of imports, or $8.6 billion, followed by China at 13 percent, or $1.8 billion, according to World Bank figures.- ‘Regular relationship’ -India has long considered Hindu-majority Nepal as a traditional ally, with open borders along the plains.”Some issues are there, some problems are there, but the regular relationship should be stable,” journalist Sharma said.Retired Indian diplomat Rakesh Sood described New Delhi’s ties with Nepal as “extensive”, encompassing trade, tourism and hydropower.Nepal is integrated with cross-border infrastructure in both directions: power lines from hydropower dams feed electricity to India, while China connects through its Belt and Road Initiative over the Himalayas via Tibet, and makes investments in airports and railways.For nearly two decades, Nepal’s political landscape was dominated by veteran leaders — many of them former Maoist insurgents — who took turns in power since the end of a 10-year civil war in 2006.Last September’s unrest erupted as youth protests against a brief social media ban, but was fuelled by far wider anger at economic stagnation and corruption.Over two days, 77 people were killed, scores were injured, and hundreds of buildings were set on fire.Oli, 74, forced out by the uprising, is seeking a return to power for a potential fifth term as prime minister.He had a fractious relationship with New Delhi — after taking office in 2024, he chose China for his first trip abroad, rather than the customary visit to India.”In Nepal, the then leftist-led government had an uncomfortable relationship with India — and that was overthrown,” Sharma added.- ‘Balance ties’ -A new cohort of first-time candidates has emerged from the loosely organised Gen Z movement that helped drive the protests, young Nepalis seeking economic reform. “Nepal’s leadership, even if at times seemingly inclined to lean toward one power or the other, aims to balance ties with India and China,” South Asia expert Michael Kugelman told AFP.”It’s hard to imagine that changing, even if there is a new influx of younger people in politics.”He suggested the status quo will likely remain, with China “comfortable with any type of political dynamic” in Kathmandu, including one with a younger profile, as long as it remains open to Beijing.”A government with youth leaders would likely not take positions on relations with India and China that diverge much with the previous government,” Kugelman said, suggesting that Nepali youth are “generally not hostile to China — even if some would prefer less Chinese influence”.Both India and China have pumped in hundreds of millions of dollars in investments into Nepal, and both are backing voting preparations, with New Delhi sending vehicles to aid the Election Commission.Kugelman said change may come if a new generation of politicians sweeps into power on an anti-corruption ticket and shakes up old practices of opaque funding for mega-projects.”Young people in Nepal won’t support Chinese or Indian actions that aim to shape Nepal’s politics or put vast amounts of money in the hands of the government in ways that aren’t transparent,” he said.

US government accused of major ‘cover-up’ over Trump sex abuse claims

Democrats on Wednesday accused US President Donald Trump’s administration of the “largest government cover-up in modern history” over reports that it withheld documents relating to allegations that the Republican leader sexually abused a minor.The Justice Department said it is reviewing its Epstein files to see if any were handled “improperly” but denied any wrongdoing. The department has released millions of pages from files connected to notorious sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein under a transparency law enacted last year. But public broadcaster NPR found gaps in the files tied to one woman’s 2019 assault complaint against Trump.Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, arguing that the DOJ’s so-called “Epstein Files” release exonerated him. Indexes and serial numbers attached to the investigative materials into Epstein’s trafficking ring indicate that FBI agents conducted four interviews with the accuser and generated summaries and accompanying notes, NPR reported.Only one summary — focused largely on her allegations against Epstein — appears in the public database.The remaining three summaries and related notes, totaling more than 50 pages, are not available on the Justice Department’s website, according to NPR’s review of the document numbering. The New York Times and cable network MS NOW reported similar findings.”This is largest government cover-up in modern history. We are demanding answers,” the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee said in statement posted to social media. – ‘Improperly tagged’ -In a statement Wednesday evening, the Justice Department said some media outlets have alleged that files related to Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell are also missing from records released to the public.”As with all documents that have been flagged by the public, the Department is currently reviewing files within that category of the production,” it said on X.”Should any document be found to have been improperly tagged in the review process and is responsive to the Act, the Department will of course publish it, consistent with the law,” it said, alluding to the bipartisan bill passed last year that ordered the Trump adminstration to release all its Epstein files.The woman at the heart of this episode of the Epstein drama first contacted authorities in July 2019, shortly after Epstein’s arrest on federal sex trafficking charges. Later internal references in the released files describe her as alleging that the disgraced financier introduced her to Trump and that Trump assaulted her in the mid-1980s, when she was 13 to 15 years old.A 2025 FBI document in the public database recounts that claim but does not include an assessment of its credibility. The detailed memos from the follow-up interviews — conducted in August and October 2019, according to the indexes — are not included.Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the Oversight Committee, said he reviewed unredacted evidence logs at the Justice Department and reached the same conclusion.”Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor,” Garcia said, adding that Democrats would open a parallel investigation and demand the missing records be provided to Congress.The Justice Department argues that any material not posted falls within categories allowed under the law, including duplicates, privileged records or documents tied to an ongoing federal investigation. Asked for comment, the Justice Department earlier Wednesday referred AFP to a social media response in which it denied deleting files and said documents temporarily removed for victim-related redactions or to remove personally identifiable information will be restored.Democrats argue that the missing interview records do not fit the categories cited by the department.

Export ban sparks rush to process lithium in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe’s ban on raw lithium exports is forcing Chinese miners to rethink their strategy, speeding up plans to process the metal locally instead of shipping it to China’s vast rechargeable battery industry.The country is Africa’s largest lithium producer and has one of the world’s largest reserves, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS).Zimbabwe already banned the export of lithium ore in 2022 and in 2025 announced it would halt exports of lithium concentrates from January 2027.But on Wednesday it imposed the ban with immediate effect, leaving unclear what the lithium mining sector will do in the short term as Zimbabwe currently has no facilities to process lithium concentrates.The move, which also included a blanket ban on export of all raw minerals, aims to capture the added value of refining and processing, thus creating jobs and additional government tax revenue.But critics say the push to refine should have come sooner, with Zimbabwe already having lost out on several years of revenues for the hard-pressed local economy.Prospect Lithium Zimbabwe, owned by Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt, has spent $400 million on a processing plant that should be operational in the coming weeks, its representative Patience Chizodza told state broadcaster ZBC. It will reportedly be the first factory in Africa to refine lithium concentrate into lithium sulfate — a powdered form that is one step closer to the product used in batteries.The facility should be capable of handling 400,000 tonnes a year of concentrate.The Zimbabwe state-owned Mutapa Energy Minerals is set to start work in the coming months on a similar plant, chief executive officer Innocent Rukweza told reporters earlier this month.”We expect that by mid-year — around June at the latest — construction of a concentrate-processing plant will be under way,” Rukweza said.The $270-million facility funded by Chinese firms would be able to process 600,000 tonnes annually, he said. – ‘Too little, too late’ – Bikita Minerals, Zimbabwe’s largest lithium mine and owned by Sinomine Resources Group, is working on feasibility studies for the construction of a lithium sulphate plant in December, spokesperson Tinomuda Chakanyuka said.”The project, which will be developed in phases, represents an estimated investment of approximately $500 million from shareholders,” Chakanyuka told AFP. He said the facility will increase local capacity to separate minerals and “contribute to Zimbabwe’s broader industrialisation and export diversification objectives.”Global demand for the soft, white metal was up 20 percent last year from 2024, with a key factor being EV sales growth in China and Europe and increased demand for batteries, the USGS said.Zimbabwe’s exports of lithium concentrate rose to 1.5 million metric tonnes last year, generating government revenue of $571.6 million, the Minerals Marketing Authority of Zimbabwe (MMCZ) announced in early February.The Zimbabwean government’s moves to ban exports of raw minerals didn’t impress its critics.”Government is doing too little, too late,” said Farai Maguwu, executive director of Zimbabwe’s Centre for Natural Resource Governance (CNRG).With the new rush for critical minerals around the world, “people are asking serious questions about the benefits to the producer country,” he said.”A country like Zimbabwe is exporting raw lithium and, in the process, enriching China at its own expense,” Maguwu said.Instead it should be building its own “mine-to-market ecosystem” that manufactures and markets lithium products, he added.Economist Godfrey Kanyenze accused the government of a “deficit in policy implementation” when it effectively gave a five-year grace period on the 2022 lithium ore ban by allowing exports of raw concentrates.Kanyenze said state oversight at Chinese-owned lithium mines was limited, making it difficult to determine how much companies actually produced and earned.There have also been allegations of environmental damage and exploitation of workers, including by paying low wages.”Zimbabwe must learn from countries like Norway, Botswana and Kuwait, which safeguard their natural resources through firm, consistent and strategic policy frameworks,” he said.

Export ban sparks rush to process lithium in ZimbabweThu, 26 Feb 2026 03:18:19 GMT

Zimbabwe’s ban on raw lithium exports is forcing Chinese miners to rethink their strategy, speeding up plans to process the metal locally instead of shipping it to China’s vast rechargeable battery industry.The country is Africa’s largest lithium producer and has one of the world’s largest reserves, according to the US Geological Survey (USGS).Zimbabwe already banned …

Export ban sparks rush to process lithium in ZimbabweThu, 26 Feb 2026 03:18:19 GMT Read More »