Devastating LA fires expected to push up insurance premiums

The fires ravaging upmarket Los Angeles districts Pacific Palisades and Malibu will be the most expensive ever to hit California, according to experts, who expect premiums to rise in a region already abandoned by many insurers.Analysts at JPMorgan estimated that the total cost of damage and insured damage had doubled in less than 24 hours to $50 billion and $20 billion respectively. And the flames were still advancing on several fronts Friday.These record levels already far outstrip the 2017 Tubbs fire and the 2018 Camp fire, whose estimates of insured damage have climbed, according to sources, to as much as $16 billion.The value of the houses makes all the difference: At this stage, more than 10,000 buildings have been destroyed this week, the vast majority of them homes worth an average of $3 million.By comparison, some 18,000 buildings were destroyed in the Camp fire in 2018, but the average house was only around $500,000.David Burt, the founder and director of DeltaTerra, a consultancy firm specializing in climate-related financial risks, estimates that the market value of the 15,400 homes in Pacific Palisades is close to $13.5 billion.Despite the high cost of the damage, experts believe insurance companies should have no problem compensating their customers.According to Standard and Poor’s, the insurers are starting 2025 with comfortable reserves thanks to strong financial results over the last two years.They have also significantly reduced their presence in the Californian regions that are highly exposed to fire risk, and are also well diversified.The JPMorgan analysts see things the same way, insisting that, at this stage, it expects “the vast majority of losses stemming from the wildfires to be concentrated in homeowners’ insurance,” and a “significantly lesser amount” in commercial fire and personal auto.- Insurance ‘exodus’ -“There’s been a mass exodus of big players from the market in these parts of California,” Ben Keys, a real estate and finance professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, told a conference Friday.”We’ve seen enormous non-renewals recently,” he said. On Wednesday, California’s insurance commissioner, Ricardo Lara, announced that homeowners in areas affected by and around the fires would be protected for a year against non-renewal and cancellation of coverage. This type of measure protected more than a million contracts in 2024.In 1968, the coastal state set up a public insurance scheme, called FAIR, for homeowners who could no longer find a private insurer.This “band-aid” was supposed to be temporary while people moved from one insurance policy to another, but has now expanded well beyond its intended use, lamented Keys, pointing out that its exposure had risen from $50 billion in 2018 to more than $450 billion today.To bring companies back on board, Commissioner Lara has also initiated a reform process authorizing them to increase premiums on condition that they do not apply any geographical exclusions.There is no longer any question of “cherry-picking” to select the best contracts, said Susan Crawford, an expert on climate and geopolitics at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.”The acceleration in ferocious weather events… should trigger awareness that actually things do need to change,” she said. “We need some measure of political adjustments in reaction to rapid climate change.”In the meantime, Californians — and perhaps Americans nationwide — should prepare for an increase in premiums; 2025 has only just begun, and the previous year was marked by some destructive disasters.According to modelling by the specialist website AccuWeather, hurricanes Milton and Helene caused $160-$180 billion and $225-$250 billion in damage respectively. On Wednesday, it estimated the total cost of the Los Angeles fires so far at between $135 billion and $150 billion.The State Department published a new national strategy on climate change Friday, stating that climate-related disasters like winter storms and hurricanes had caused $182.7 billion in economic losses in 2024 — twice as much as in 2023.

Ex-NY mayor Giuliani in contempt of court — again

A US judge held former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani in contempt of court on Friday for continuing to defame two Georgia election workers.Giuliani, Donald Trump’s former personal lawyer, was ordered by a federal jury in Washington in December 2023 to pay nearly $148 million to Ruby Freeman and her daughter Wandrea “Shaye” Moss for repeatedly making false claims that they engaged in 2020 election fraud.At a court hearing in Washington on Friday, District Judge Beryl Howell found Giuliani in contempt and threatened him with potential fines if he continues to make defamatory remarks about the pair.It was the second time this week the 80-year-old Giuliani was found in contempt of court.A district judge in New York held him in contempt on Monday for failing to reveal information about assets he has been ordered to hand over to Freeman and Moss.Giuliani attacked Howell following the hearing in Washington, calling her a “mockery of a judge” and saying she is “dying to give me a prison sentence.””I shouldn’t be the one that’s paying fines,” he told reporters. “I shouldn’t be the one in contempt, she should be.”Giuliani was a key figure in Trump’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election he lost to Democrat Joe Biden. A former New York prosecutor, he has been disbarred over his false election claims.Giuliani, who has filed for bankruptcy, has been ordered to surrender his $6 million New York apartment, a 1980 Mercedes Benz convertible, jewelry, luxury watches, and valuable collectible items including a jersey signed by baseball legend Joe DiMaggio.Giuliani was found guilty of defaming the two women as they took part in a vote count in the swing state of Georgia after the presidential election in 2020.Using a video showing the two women passing an object — later revealed to be a mint — the former New York mayor claimed they were exchanging a USB drive “like vials of heroin or cocaine” to rig the results.Freeman and Moss, who are Black, told the jury during the defamation trial that Giuliani’s false accusations had upended their lives and made them the target of racist threats.An eight-person federal jury awarded Freeman and Moss more than $16 million each for defamation, $20 million each for emotional distress and $75 million in punitive damages.

Wind lull offers hope in Los Angeles fires

Winds calmed Friday around Los Angeles, providing a fleeting window of opportunity in a firefighting battle against five major blazes wreaking havoc across the city.At least 10 people have died as flames ripped through neighborhoods, razing thousands of homes in one of the worst disasters ever to hit California, with one estimate suggesting the bill could hit $150 billion.As the scale of the damage to America’s second-biggest city started to come into focus, Angelenos grappled with heart-rending ruin.”I lost everything. My house burned down and I lost everything,” Hester Callul, who reached a shelter after fleeing her Altadena home, told AFP.As fears of looting and crime grow, California Governor Gavin Newsom deployed the National Guard to bolster law enforcement. Los Angeles County Sheriff Robert Luna imposed a nighttime curfew in some areas.”This curfew will be strictly enforced and is being taken to enhance public safety, protect property and prevent any burglaries or looting in the area that the residents have evacuated,” he said.Luna said anyone who falls foul of the rule could be jailed.”We are not screwing around with this,” he said.The five separate fires have so far burned more than 35,000 acres (14,000 hectares), California’s fire agency reported.Authorities have said it was too early to know the cause of the blazes.- ‘Still very dangerous’ -A temporary lull in winds has enabled progress in tackling the fires.The biggest of the blazes has ripped through more than 20,000 acres of the upscale Pacific Palisades neighborhood, where firefighters said they were starting to get the fire under control.By Friday eight percent of its perimeter was contained — meaning it can’t spread any further in that direction.The Eaton fire in the Altadena area was three percent checked, with almost 14,000 acres scorched and key infrastructure — including communication towers — threatened.A third fire that exploded Thursday afternoon near Calabasas and the wealthy Hidden Hills enclave, home to celebrities like Kim Kardashian, added to the feeling of encirclement.”You just feel surrounded,” one woman told a local broadcaster.After a massive response to the blaze, including retardant drops from planes and helicopters dumping vast quantities of water, the fire was 35 percent surrounded, firefighters said on Friday.But federal emergency chiefs warned the situation is “still very dangerous” and the reprieve from intense gusts that spread embers will not last.”It is still very dynamic. The winds have died down today, but as I just got a weather briefing… the winds are going to increase again in the coming days,” said Deanne Criswell, administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.”The beauty of the wind dying down is that they can get better control over the fires, but it also doesn’t blow the smoke out,” she told a White House briefing.- ‘Heartbroken’ -AFP journalists surveyed the Pacific Palisades and Malibu via helicopter, witnessing mile after mile of obliteration.”This is crazy… All these homes, gone,” said pilot Albert Azouz.On highly coveted Malibu oceanfront plots, skeletal frames of buildings indicated the fire’s power, with many multimillion-dollar mansions vanishing entirely.Socialite and hotel heiress Paris Hilton was among those whose homes were lost.”Heartbroken beyond words,” she wrote on Instagram.”Sitting with my family, watching the news, and seeing our home in Malibu burn to the ground on live TV is something no one should ever have to experience.The fires could be the costliest ever recorded, with AccuWeather estimating total damage and loss between $135 billion and $150 billion.Beyond the immediate carnage, the fires disrupted life for millions: schools were closed, hundreds of thousands were without power and major events were canceled or, in the case of an NFL playoff game between the Los Angeles Rams and the Minnesota Vikings, moved.Meteorologist Mike Woofford of the National Weather Center told AFP winds would lessen Friday and Saturday, offering a vital opportunity to firefighters.”We’re seeing a little bit of a decrease now, but more so this afternoon dropping off, and then not much wind tomorrow, until later in the day,” he said.”For sure, good news,” he said, but cautioned it remained dry and winds were expected to return.Wildfires occur naturally, but scientists say human-caused climate change is altering weather and changing the dynamics of the blazes.Two wet years in southern California have given way to a very dry one, leaving ample fuel on the ground primed to burn.

Strong US jobs report sends stocks sliding, dollar rising

Wall Street stocks slumped and the dollar climbed on Friday as a robust US jobs report dimmed hopes of further interest rate cuts.Oil prices, meanwhile, briefly jumped past $80 per barrel on new US sanctions on Russia, further disrupting its crude exports and therefore tightening supplies.The world’s biggest economy added 256,000 jobs last month, up from a revised 212,000 in November, said the Labor Department.The figure smashed market expectations of between 150,000 and 160,000 jobs.Traders say a strong US economy, as evidenced by the jobs data, means there is less likelihood of further Federal Reserve rate cuts — which have caused bond yields and the dollar to climb and stocks to move lower.”Sentiment has soured on equity markets and the bond market strop out is showing signs of intensifying,” said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown. Briefing.com analyst Patrick O’Hare said: “The key takeaway from the report for the market is that it was perhaps too good.”The Fed indicated last month that it would cut rates just twice this year — down from the four previously flagged — due to sticky inflation.That came amid concerns that incoming president Donald Trump’s plans to slash taxes, regulations and immigration — and to impose harsh tariffs on imports — would reignite price increases.O’Hare said the strong jobs report suggests “the Fed may have made a mistake cutting rates as aggressively as it did at the end of 2024”.Hargreaves Lansdown’s Streeter said: “Hopes for multiple rate cuts from the Fed… have fizzled out.”Market expectations of the next rate cut have shifted to later in the year.”The market may not love this jobs number but there are a lot worse things than a strong labour market,” said US investment analyst Bret Kenwell at eToro trading platform.A strong jobs market is needed to keep consumers spending, which is the motor of the US economy, he noted.”Investors need to keep that in mind — even if that means rate-cut expectations take a step back,” Kenwell added.- Bond pressure -The yield on US government bonds jumped following the jobs report.Across the Atlantic, UK 10-year bond yields remained high after surging to their highest level since the 2008 global financial crisis, amid talk the government may have to make spending cuts or hike taxes to help repay state debt.The pound remained under pressure after hitting levels against the dollar on Thursday not seen since late 2023.”The global bond selloff showed few signs of letting up… with long-term borrowing costs continuing to move higher,” noted Jim Reid, managing director at Deutsche Bank. “Even though the UK might appear the most striking in terms of when yields last traded at these levels, other countries have experienced a similar pattern too,” he added.European markets closed lower.In Asia, the Tokyo, Hong Kong and Shanghai stock markets also closed lower on Friday.- Key figures around 2125 GMT -New York – Dow: DOWN 1.6 percent at 41,938.45 points (close)New York – S&P 500: DOWN 1.5 percent at 5,827.04 (close)New York – Nasdaq Composite: DOWN 1.6 percent at 19,161.62 (close) London – FTSE 100: DOWN 0.9 percent at 8,248.49 (close)Paris – CAC 40: DOWN 0.8 percent at 7,431.04 (close)Frankfurt – DAX: DOWN 0.5 percent at 20,214.79 (close)Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 1.1 percent at 39,190.40 (close)Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 0.9 percent at 19,064.29 (close)Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 1.3 percent at 3,168.52 (close)Euro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0244 from $1.0296 on ThursdayPound/dollar: DOWN at $1.2210 from $1.2293Dollar/yen: DOWN at 157.74 yen from 157.96 yenEuro/pound: UP at 83.90 pence from 83.75 penceBrent North Sea Crude: UP 3.7 percent at $79.76 per barrelWest Texas Intermediate: UP 3.6 percent at $76.57 per barrelburs-rl/gil/bys/des

Retraites, budget… négociations intenses, Lombard pense qu’on peut “avancer”

A l’approche de la déclaration de politique de générale de François Bayrou mardi, les tractations se sont intensifiées sur les retraites et le budget, le ministre de l’Économie Éric Lombard jugeant possible “d’avancer”, alors que les socialistes demandant une suspension de l’application de la mesure des 64 ans, le temps de sa renégociation.En fin de journée, Éric Lombard a estimé devant la presse, à l’issue d’une semaine-marathon entre Bercy et les partis politiques représentés au Parlement, que l’esprit qui a animé le dialogue “permettra d’avancer”. Dans le même temps, un écologiste a dit à l’AFP sentir les négociations “s’enliser”.Depuis plusieurs jours, déclenchant la fureur de Jean-Luc Mélenchon qui a dénoncé “leur servilité”, socialistes, Écologistes et communistes discutent avec le gouvernement, principalement Bercy. Avec l’objectif de trouver “un chemin” qui leur permettrait de ne pas voter la motion de censure que les Insoumis ont l’intention de déposer après la déclaration de politique générale.Le chef des sénateurs socialistes Patrick Kanner a évoqué sur franceinfo, à défaut d’une abrogation de la réforme des retraites entrée en vigueur en septembre 2023, une suspension de l’application du report progressif de l’âge de départ de 62 à 64 ans, pendant 6 mois, le temps d’une renégociation avec les partenaires sociaux.”Cette négociation de six mois pourrait commencer très vite et, pendant ce temps là, nous demandons une suspension ou l’équivalent d’une suspension”, a dit M. Kanner.Il a ensuite précisé à l’AFP que cette durée de six mois résultait d’une réflexion personnelle, qui n’engageait pas le Parti socialiste. “Si nous sommes entendus (…), il n’y aura pas de censure portée par les socialistes”, a assuré le sénateur. Les discussions porteraient notamment sur les “64 ans”, “j’ai senti quelques bougés au niveau du gouvernement”.Au final, “l’arbitrage va revenir à François Bayrou”, mais une des pistes envisagées est bien de faire “une pause” sur la réforme pour réenclencher des négociations, a confirmé à l’AFP un cadre de la majorité.Ces discussions poussées avec le gouvernement mettent en fureur La France insoumise, qui accuse désormais le PS de vouloir abandonner la retraite par répartition pour un système de retraite par points, cher à Emmanuel Macron, ce qu’a démenti le secrétaire général Pierre Jouvet, dénonçant une “fake news”.- discussion “jusqu’à lundi soir” -Une “synthèse” des échanges entre le gouvernement et les formations politiques sera transmise samedi au Premier ministre, a fait savoir Éric Lombard, saluant “l’esprit de responsabilité et de transparence qui a animé toute cette semaine”. La ministre des Comptes publics Amélie de Montchalin, qui l’accompagnait, s’est dite “très rassurée”: “il y a dans notre pays des responsables politiques qui (…) partagent le sentiment (…) qu’il nous faut un budget rapidement”.Les locataires de Bercy seront reçus samedi soir par François Bayrou, avec la ministre du Travail et de la Santé Catherine Vautrin, selon une source au sein de l’exécutif.Le débat porte avant tout sur le coût d’une remise en cause de la réforme alors que le gouvernement souhaite un effort budgétaire d’environ 50 milliards d’euros cette année.Selon la Caisse nationale d’assurance vieillesse, abroger le recul de l’âge de la retraite coûterait 3,4 milliards d’euros en 2025 et près de 16 milliards en 2032. Le PS propose de mettre à contribution le Fonds de réserve des retraites créé à la fin des années 1990, à hauteur de 2 à 3 milliards d’euros cette année. Le gouvernement ne doit pas non plus s’aliéner le soutien des macronistes qui ont défendu la réforme en dépit des manifestations massives des opposants. À côté des retraites, les socialistes ont mis d’autres questions sur la table, comme les suppressions de postes dans l’Éducation nationale ou la justice fiscale. Selon le journal L’Opinion, Amélie de Montchalin a évoqué devant eux la piste d’une taxation du patrimoine des plus riches.  A la presse vendredi soir, la ministre a simplement fait part de la “conviction” du gouvernement qu’il ne fallait pas “réduire le déficit en augmentant les impôts pour les classes moyennes”.Outre l’abandon de la réforme des retraites, les Écologistes réclament, eux, de “remettre 7 milliards a minima sur l’environnement”, a expliqué Marine Tondelier à l’AFP.  far-caz-od-sde/jp/

France warns Algeria against escalation of influencers showdownFri, 10 Jan 2025 20:39:16 GMT

France threatened on Friday to “retaliate” if Algeria escalates a diplomatic row that has flared up over the arrests of Algerian social media influencers accused of inciting violence.Tensions between France and its former colony mounted after Algeria on Thursday sent back a suspect who had been arrested and expelled for a video posted on TikTok.They …

France warns Algeria against escalation of influencers showdownFri, 10 Jan 2025 20:39:16 GMT Read More »

La méthode Bayrou: des poids lourds en première ligne, un Premier ministre en surplomb

Par pragmatisme ou pour limiter les risques, François Bayrou assume de rester en retrait des négociations sur le budget, laissant ses poids lourds à la manÅ“uvre pour tenter d’obtenir une non-censure de la gauche sans froisser ses partenaires de la droite et du centre.C’est le Premier ministre qui arbitrera néanmoins les choix budgétaires susceptibles d’éviter une censure des socialistes, qui devraient figurer dans sa déclaration de politique générale mardi.A défaut d’avoir pu faire entrer dans le gouvernement des ministres socialistes, François Bayrou a nommé des “poids lourds” qui ont une “histoire” avec la gauche, explique une source gouvernementale, dont Eric Lombard (Economie), un ancien banquier à la fibre rocardienne, qui a piloté l’essentiel des discussions.François Bayrou entend les laisser s’exprimer dans les médias et ne relira pas leurs interviews comme c’est d’usage, parce que c’est “infantilisant”, explique-t-on à Matignon.Au risque de réveiller des compétitions mortifères en vue de la présidentielle, comme celle entrevue dans les expressions multiples des ministres Bruno Retailleau (Intérieur, LR) et Gérald Darmanin (Justice, Renaissance), bien que ces derniers s’en défendent.- “Un pas vers l’autre” -Pour le budget, c’est Eric Lombard et sa collègue du Budget Amélie de Montchalin, et non le Premier ministre, qui ont reçu tour à tour les groupes parlementaires, et à deux reprises les représentants socialistes, sans les voix desquelles les députés LFI et du Rassemblement national ne peuvent pas faire tomber le gouvernement.Catherine Vautrin, en charge du projet de loi de financement de la Sécurité sociale, a elle aussi entendu les forces politiques.Le ministre de l’Economie remettra, avec ses collègues, samedi soir à François Bayrou la “synthèse” de ce dialogue qui d’après lui “permettra d’avancer” sur le budget 2025. Eric Lombard “sait faire dans les négos”, souligne un de ses amis, ancien ministre macroniste, même si “ce n’est pas la même chose de négocier un accord politique et un closing bancaire”.Concernant la méthode Bayrou, un ancien député MoDem défend le “pragmatisme” du Béarnais car sur “quelques points”, les Français “ne sont ni de droite ni de gauche”. Une ancienne ministre macroniste salue, elle, la démarche de “laisser les ministres y aller”, sans “esbroufe”, en “respectant” le Parlement.François Bayrou a échangé de son côté avec les partenaires sociaux, qui se sont entretenus également avec M. Lombard. Une méthode qui diffère d’Emmanuel Macron, accusé de contourner les corps intermédiaires et d’oublier la gauche.”Jamais je n’abandonne l’idée que des gens, même très différents, acceptent de faire un pas l’un vers l’autre. C’est la condition même du redressement et de la reconstruction”, a-t-il affirmé vendredi soir lors de la présentation de ses voeux à Pau, ville dont il est resté maire.- “Responsabilité” -Le Premier ministre a préparé le terrain de ces concertations. “Il a compris ce que Barnier n’avait pas réussi. Il a pris contact avec tout le monde, très en amont”, alors qu’il avait été reproché à Michel Barnier de ne pas avoir reçu assez tôt les socialistes et le RN, fait valoir une source parlementaire.”C’est pas idiot de discuter en amont avec ceux qui ont les moyens de vous censurer plutôt que de les voir en dernier et de les braquer”, ajoute cette source.Le chef du gouvernement s’appuie par ailleurs au Parlement sur deux piliers de sa famille politique, le ministre des Relations avec le Parlement Patrick Mignola et le président du groupe MoDem, qui a déjà occupé ce ministère, Marc Fesneau.Rester en surplomb lui permet en outre de ne pas écorner son image, alors que seuls 20% des Français lui font confiance, un niveau très éloigné de ceux enregistrés par ses prédécesseurs à leurs débuts à Matignon, selon un sondage Elabe.Eric Lombard a salué vendredi soir “l’esprit de responsabilité” des socialistes.”Sur le terrain, les gens disent avoir besoin de stabilité et d’un budget. La gauche ne peut pas ne pas entendre ce son de cloche”, soutient un ministre macroniste.Si les discussions aboutissent à un accord avec le PS, il restera à convaincre les macronistes et la droite.Mais même si le groupe macroniste est opposé à une éventuelle suspension de la réforme des retraites, le “risque est faible” qu’il vote la censure, selon la source parlementaire.Gabriel Attal pour les députés macronistes et Laurent Wauquiez au nom des Républicains “ne vont pas s’opposer au fait qu’il y ait un budget, ils ne vont pas s’opposer à la loi agricole, ils ne vont pas s’opposer à Mayotte”, fait valoir cette source.Un ancien ministre du camp présidentiel estime qu'”il y aura moins d’impatience” chez les macronistes à voir tomber Bayrou.