US announces new restrictions on AI chip exports

The United States unveiled new export rules Monday on chips used for artificial intelligence, furthering efforts to make it tough for China and other rivals to access the advanced technology in Joe Biden’s final days as president.The announcement of the restrictions drew a fiery pushback from Beijing and prompted US chip industry criticism, while the European Union expressed its “concern” over the approach.In recent years, Washington has expanded its efforts to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, which can be used in AI and weapons systems, as Beijing’s tech advancements spark concern among US policymakers.”The US leads the world in AI now — both AI development and AI chip design — and it’s critical that we keep it that way,” Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told reporters.The new rules update controls on chips, requiring authorizations for exports, re-exports and in-country transfers — while also including a series of exceptions for countries considered friendly to the United States.If a country is not exempted — and most are not — they will face a cap on imports of advanced chips.AI data centers meanwhile will need to comply with enhanced security parameters to be able to import chips.The restrictions also tighten rules around the sharing of cutting-edge AI models.China’s Commerce Ministry called the new policy “a flagrant violation” of international trade rules, vowing that Beijing would “firmly safeguard” its interests.The European Union meanwhile expressed concern about US measures and stressed that Europe did not represent a “security risk.”- US competitiveness -The latest move drew industry criticism and warnings that it would hurt US competitiveness.Semiconductor Industry Association chief executive John Neuffer said: “We’re deeply disappointed that a policy shift of this magnitude and impact is being rushed out the door days before a presidential transition and without any meaningful input from industry.”He added in a statement that the rule could cause “lasting damage to America’s economy and global competitiveness” by ceding key markets to rivals.Chip titan Nvidia said in a blog post that “while cloaked in the guise of an ‘anti-China’ measure, these rules would do nothing to enhance US security.”In a white paper released Monday, OpenAI said the federal government should help the AI industry grow, adding that “responsibly exporting” cutting-edge models to allies and partners will help them stand up their own AI ecosystems.- Trump decision? -The rules make it “hard for our strategic competitors to use smuggling and remote access to evade our export control,” White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said.They also create “incentives for our friends and partners around the world to use trusted vendors for advanced AI,” he added.The new rules will take effect in 120 days, Raimondo said, giving President-elect Trump’s incoming administration time to potentially make changes.Freezing the rule, however, could risk allowing China to stockpile US hardware, a senior US official told reporters.And the Computer & Communications Industry Association cautioned that the rule will hamper the ability of US firms to deploy advanced semiconductors in data centers abroad.In its post, Nvidia stressed that the first Trump term showed how the United States “wins through innovation, competition and by sharing our technologies with the world — not by retreating behind a wall of government overreach.”Trump put heavy tariffs on China during his first presidential term.But his backers in Silicon Valley could also see the rules as an undue burden on their ability to export products.On Monday, Nvidia shares lost around two percent.The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) said that pressuring countries to choose between Washington and Beijing could alienate partners and boost China’s position in global AI.”Many countries may opt for the side offering them uninterrupted access to the AI technologies vital for their economic growth and digital futures,” said ITIF vice president Daniel Castro.

US announces new restrictions on AI chip exports

The United States unveiled new export rules Monday on chips used for artificial intelligence, furthering efforts to make it tough for China and other rivals to access the advanced technology in Joe Biden’s final days as president.The announcement of the restrictions drew a fiery pushback from Beijing and prompted US chip industry criticism, while the European Union expressed its “concern” over the approach.In recent years, Washington has expanded its efforts to curb exports of state-of-the-art chips to China, which can be used in AI and weapons systems, as Beijing’s tech advancements spark concern among US policymakers.”The US leads the world in AI now — both AI development and AI chip design — and it’s critical that we keep it that way,” Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told reporters.The new rules update controls on chips, requiring authorizations for exports, re-exports and in-country transfers — while also including a series of exceptions for countries considered friendly to the United States.If a country is not exempted — and most are not — they will face a cap on imports of advanced chips.AI data centers meanwhile will need to comply with enhanced security parameters to be able to import chips.The restrictions also tighten rules around the sharing of cutting-edge AI models.China’s Commerce Ministry called the new policy “a flagrant violation” of international trade rules, vowing that Beijing would “firmly safeguard” its interests.The European Union meanwhile expressed concern about US measures and stressed that Europe did not represent a “security risk.”- US competitiveness -The latest move drew industry criticism and warnings that it would hurt US competitiveness.Semiconductor Industry Association chief executive John Neuffer said: “We’re deeply disappointed that a policy shift of this magnitude and impact is being rushed out the door days before a presidential transition and without any meaningful input from industry.”He added in a statement that the rule could cause “lasting damage to America’s economy and global competitiveness” by ceding key markets to rivals.Chip titan Nvidia said in a blog post that “while cloaked in the guise of an ‘anti-China’ measure, these rules would do nothing to enhance US security.”In a white paper released Monday, OpenAI said the federal government should help the AI industry grow, adding that “responsibly exporting” cutting-edge models to allies and partners will help them stand up their own AI ecosystems.- Trump decision? -The rules make it “hard for our strategic competitors to use smuggling and remote access to evade our export control,” White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said.They also create “incentives for our friends and partners around the world to use trusted vendors for advanced AI,” he added.The new rules will take effect in 120 days, Raimondo said, giving President-elect Trump’s incoming administration time to potentially make changes.Freezing the rule, however, could risk allowing China to stockpile US hardware, a senior US official told reporters.And the Computer & Communications Industry Association cautioned that the rule will hamper the ability of US firms to deploy advanced semiconductors in data centers abroad.In its post, Nvidia stressed that the first Trump term showed how the United States “wins through innovation, competition and by sharing our technologies with the world — not by retreating behind a wall of government overreach.”Trump put heavy tariffs on China during his first presidential term.But his backers in Silicon Valley could also see the rules as an undue burden on their ability to export products.On Monday, Nvidia shares lost around two percent.The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) said that pressuring countries to choose between Washington and Beijing could alienate partners and boost China’s position in global AI.”Many countries may opt for the side offering them uninterrupted access to the AI technologies vital for their economic growth and digital futures,” said ITIF vice president Daniel Castro.

Hunter Biden prosecutor says president ‘maligned’ Justice Department

The special counsel who prosecuted Hunter Biden accused US President Joe Biden on Monday of undermining public confidence in the justice system with his criticism of the investigation into his son.Hunter Biden, 54, was convicted of gun and tax crimes in cases brought by special counsel David Weiss but was pardoned by his father in December.Weiss, in his final report on the case released Monday, noted that the president, in announcing the pardon, had criticized the prosecution of his son, calling it “selective,” “unfair,” “infected” by “raw politics,” and a “miscarriage of justice.””This statement is gratuitous and wrong,” Weiss said. “Other presidents have pardoned family members, but in doing so, none have taken the occasion as an opportunity to malign the public servants at the Department of Justice based solely on false accusations.”The special counsel said the prosecutions of Hunter Biden were “the culmination of thorough, impartial investigations, not partisan politics.”Calling those rulings into question and injecting partisanship into the independent administration of the law undermines the very foundation of what makes America’s justice system fair and equitable,” he said. “It erodes public confidence in an institution that is essential to preserving the rule of law.”Biden pardoned his son prior to his sentencing in the two criminal cases.”No reasonable person who looks at the facts of Hunter’s cases can reach any other conclusion than Hunter was singled out only because he is my son — and that is wrong,” the president said at the time.The release of Weiss’s report comes shortly before the expected release this week of another special counsel report — that of Jack Smith, who brought two criminal cases against former and now future president Donald Trump.Smith accused Trump of seeking to overturn the results of the 2020 election he lost to Biden and mishandling top secret documents after leaving the White House.Neither case came to trial and Smith, in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president, dropped the charges after Trump won the November presidential election.- History of personal pardons -Smith’s report on the election interference case is likely to be released this week but his report on the documents case may be withheld because charges are pending against two of Trump’s former co-defendants.Hunter Biden was convicted last year of lying about his drug use when he bought a gun — a felony — and he pleaded guilty in a separate tax evasion case.His father had repeatedly said he would not pardon Hunter but that he decided to do so after he “watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted.”US presidents have previously used pardons to help family members and other political allies.Bill Clinton pardoned his half-brother for old cocaine charges and Trump pardoned the father of his son-in-law for tax evasion, though in both cases those men had already served their prison terms.Trump has vowed to pardon supporters who stormed the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, in a bid to reverse his 2020 election loss.

Des “réfugiés” américains de TikTok adoptent une autre application chinoise

De nombreux créateurs de contenus et utilisateurs américains ont rejoint Xiaohongshu (“Petit Livre Rouge”), une application chinoise similaire à Instagram, se présentant parfois comme des “réfugiés” de TikTok, propriété du groupe chinois ByteDance, qui pourrait être interdite à partir de dimanche aux Etats-Unis.Xiaohongshu était en tête des téléchargements d’applications gratuites lundi sur l’Apple Store américain (la boutique d’applications mobiles d’Apple), juste devant Lemon8, un autre réseau social de ByteDance. A moins d’une intervention de dernière minute de la Cour suprême américaine, considérée comme peu probable, TikTok sera banni aux Etats-Unis dimanche. La loi adoptée en avril donne en effet jusqu’au 19 janvier à sa maison mère chinoise pour le vendre, faute d’interdiction.Sur TikTok, de nombreux utilisateurs américains ont publié ce weekend des appels à se rendre sur Xiaohongshu, des récits de leurs premières impressions, des clips humoristiques ou encore des tutoriels pour créer un profil sur la plateforme, qui est quasi entièrement en mandarin.Beaucoup se moquent ouvertement des inquiétudes des élus américains, républicains comme démocrates, au sujet de la sécurité nationale et de la confidentialité des données, avec des vidéos pour dire “au revoir” à leur “espion chinois”.”Oh, vous ne voulez pas que les Chinois aient nos données personnelles très sensibles ?”, ironise ainsi Jen Hamilton, sur un ton faussement innocent, dans une vidéo sur TikTok. “Eh bien on va leur donner directement !”, continue-t-elle avec une voix menaçante.”Il est impossible de sous-estimer à quel point je me soucie peu que les Chinois aient mes données”, ajoute cette infirmière et influenceuse, suivie par 3,9 millions de personnes.Elle trouve que c’est “super marrant” sur “RedNote”- comme les utilisateurs américains ont surnommé Xiaohongshu – et que la plateforme ressemble à un croisement d’Instagram et de Pinterest, avec des vidéos à faire défiler comme sur TikTok.”Le PDG (de Xiaohongshu, ndlr) a même posté une vidéo nous souhaitant la bienvenue à nous, les réfugiés de TikTok !”, se réjouit-elle.Alors que des créateurs de contenus avaient pendant un temps essayé de rediriger leurs abonnés vers Instagram, certains appellent désormais à boycotter Instagram et Facebook, les réseaux sociaux de Meta, qu’ils accusent d’avoir fait du lobby pour obtenir l’interdiction de TikTok.Lors d’une audition vendredi à la Cour suprême américaine, une nette majorité des juges se sont montrés disposés à permettre l’entrée en vigueur de loi contre TikTok.L’application et de nombreuses ONG accusent le texte de violation de la liberté d’expression, inscrite dans la Constitution des Etats-Unis.Les autorités disent de leur côté vouloir prévenir les risques d’espionnage et de manipulation par les autorités chinoises des utilisateurs de TikTok, qui en revendique 170 millions dans le pays.

Nine charged over looting in LA fires: prosecutor

Nine people have been charged in connection with looting in evacuation zones around huge fires burning in Los Angeles, the area’s chief prosecutor said Monday.The charges include for one burglary that netted $200,000 and one in which an Emmy statuette was stolen, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman told reporters.One of those charged faces the possibility of life in prison if convicted, Hochman said, adding the legal action should serve as a warning to potential wrongdoers.”The question is not if, but when, you will be caught if you engage in these crimes,” Hochman said.”Do not commit any of these crimes in which people are trying to profit from the tragedy of the people who have suffered from these various fires.”Around 92,000 people remain displaced seven days after huge fires erupted around Los Angeles, killing at least 24 people.Evacuation zones in which 12,000 structures lie in ruins have been declared out of bounds as police work to reassure residents that their property will be safe from looters.But arrests continue to mount, and on Monday the first charges were announced.Two suspects were caught on a Ring doorbell camera invading a home in the affluent Mandeville Canyon area, which was threatened by the Palisades fire over the weekend.Hochman said Martrell Peoples has previous serious convictions and, under the so-called “three-strike” rule, could be imprisoned for life.His alleged accomplice, Demari Bell, could be jailed for more than 22 years. A third man was arrested for hit-and-run as police hunted down those responsible for the burglarySix other suspects have been charged with a number of home burglaries in Altadena, including the theft of an Emmy Award from one home.No details were given about who owned the statuette.Blake Chow of the Los Angeles Police Department said officers across jurisdictions were working together to bring criminals to book at a difficult time for the community.”Isn’t it bad enough we have (thousands of) people that have been evacuated from an area, and then we get a handful of people that want to… go victimize them,” he said.

Biden announces aircraft carriers will be named for Clinton, Bush

US President Joe Biden announced Monday that two of the Navy’s future aircraft carriers will be named for former commanders-in-chief Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.”The future USS William J. Clinton (CVN 82) and the future USS George W. Bush (CVN 83) will begin construction in the years ahead,” Biden said in a statement issued just a week before he is replaced in office by Donald Trump.”When complete, they will join the most capable, flexible, and professional Navy that has ever put to sea,” Biden said. The United States has a long tradition of naming some of its aircraft carriers — massive warships that are crewed by thousands of sailors and carry dozens of planes — after former presidents.The latest line of US carriers is named for Gerald R. Ford, and another of the multi-billion-dollar ships bears John F. Kennedy’s name — the second time he has been honored in that way.Clinton — who did not serve in the military — was president from 1993 to 2001, a period that saw US warplanes carry out strikes in Iraq and Yugoslavia, and American troops battle Somali militiamen in the infamous Black Hawk Down incident, among other conflicts.Bush, who served as a pilot in the Air National Guard, held America’s highest office from 2001 to 2009. His presidency was defined by the so-called “War on Terror” that he launched in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, a military effort that spanned the globe and included the devastating, long-running wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that left tens of thousands of people dead.US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin hailed the choice of the names, saying that the ships “will serve as lasting tributes to each leader’s legacy in service of the United States.””Like their namesakes, these two future carriers, and the crews who sail them, will work to safeguard our national security, remind us of our history, and inspire others to serve our great republic,” Austin said in a statement.

US pro sports teams pledge $8 million in LA fire relief

A dozen Los Angeles professional sports teams pledged $8 million toward wildfire relief on Monday and outlined plans for three events to distribute supplies to those affected by blazes still ravaging the United States’ second-largest city.The NFL’s Rams and Chargers, the NBA’s Lakers and Clippers, MLB’s Dodgers and Angels, MLS’s Galaxy and LAFC, the NHL’s Ducks and Kings, the WNBA’s Sparks and the NWSL’s Angel City FC said the funds would go to multiple organizations including the American Red Cross, the Los Angeles Fire Department Foundation, World Central Kitchen and various local animal rescue organizations.Apparel manufacturer Fanatics has also partnered with the teams to distribute $3 million in merchandise to families that have been evacuated from their homes.Clothes, hygiene kits, school supplies, shoes and other items would be distributed on Friday at Dodger Stadium, the Ram’s SoFi Stadium and at BMO Stadium — home of LAFC and Angel City FC.More than 90,000 people remained displaced Monday, seven days after multiple wind-driven blazes erupted.At least 24 people were killed and thousands left without homes, and authorities warned that winds forecast to intensify again on Tuesday could lead to “extreme fire behavior and life-threatening conditions.”In order not to divert public resources from the fires the NFL moved the Rams’ playoff game against the Minnesota Vikings to Arizona on Monday night.Two Lakers games and one Clippers game were postponed, but both teams were scheduled to host games on Monday, with the Lakers encouraging fans to bring donations of supplies to their downtown arena.The Lakers said in a statement that Monday’s game would be “dedicated to the Los Angeles community and Southern California’s first responders”.

‘Mommy, what’s happening?’: Young families left traumatized by LA fires

As deadly flames swept closer and smoke poured into their Los Angeles home, Zahrah Mihm tried to calmly wake her two young children in the middle of the night.”We gotta go baby. We’re going on a fun adventure,” she told 4-year-old Ethan in her gentlest voice, scooping up her 18-month-old baby and fleeing their house in Altadena.The neighborhood would soon be totally razed by the inferno. At least 17 died in this community alone, with more bodies being discovered. The trauma has been severe for everyone, but is perhaps more acute among evacuated families with young children, many of whom are now desperately seeking diapers, milk formula and clothing.And then there is the question of how to explain this colossal disaster to children who may sense their parents’ panic, even if they do not fully grasp what is happening.”When we woke up at four in the morning panicking, he was shaking, scared,” recalled Mihm.”I was like, ‘Are you cold?’ He’s like, ‘No, mommy, what’s happening? Why is there fire?'” The Mihms are sheltering at a friend’s home after struggling to find a hotel.Even now, Zahrah is trying to distract her son, describing their visit Monday to a donation center in search of clean bedding and diapers as “a super fun party” packed with people, food and toys.As his mother — still wearing the slippers in which she’d fled — spoke to an AFP reporter, Ethan proudly displayed his new dinosaur pajamas and toy car. “I’m trying to take this moment out of his mind, and just be like, ‘It’s all good. Our house got a little owie, we are gonna fix it. It’s gonna be fine,'” she said, out of earshot of him.- ‘Traumatized’ -The donation center in nearby Arcadia — which sprung up organically from one resident’s TikTok post asking for supplies, and has drawn hundreds of volunteers — received so many donations it is turning some away, but baby products remain among the most pressing needs.”We desperately need diapers,” said Kellie Krievs, a 38-year-old communications director who is volunteering at the makeshift operation in the parking lot of the Santa Anita racetrack.”A lot of people, the first thing they ask for is diapers and baby formula,” Krievs told AFP.Beyond those products, mental health is an urgent concern.”The kids are not alright,” said Chessa Latifi, deputy director of emergency response for NGO Project Hope.”They’re acting differently and they’re under stress — they know that their friends have lost their homes, and they know that their school is closed.”She urged parents to maintain whatever normalcy they can, including setting up playdates with friends.”Just trying to make sure they understand that their community, whether it be physically or emotionally, is still there for them,” she said.”This entire city has been traumatized, whether your house was burnt down or not,” Latifi added.Thankfully for the Mihms, their home was only partially burnt.Neighboring homes on three sides of their property were totally destroyed, as the blaze miraculously swept in an S-shape around them.But they are still unable to return, with no electricity, powerlines dangling dangerously around the house, and National Guard soldiers sealing off the street.”We’re OK. We’re just devastated, that’s all,” Mihm said.