Motown legend Smokey Robinson sued for sexual assault
Motown legend Smokey Robinson was facing a multimillion dollar lawsuit on Tuesday from four former housekeepers who allege the soul singer repeatedly raped and sexually assaulted them.A lawsuit filed in a Los Angeles court claims the 85-year-old forced himself on the women multiple times over a number of years, often when his wife was not at home.One of the plaintiffs alleges the “Tracks of My Tears” singer would summon her to his bedroom in his Los Angeles area home, and greet her wearing only his underwear.He would then sexually assault her, despite her protestations, with the suit claiming there were seven such attacks between March 2023 and when she felt compelled to resign in February 2024.Another former housekeeper alleges Robinson assaulted her more than 20 times over a four-year period, while a third says in the suit that she was “sexually harassed, sexually assaulted and raped” throughout her 12-year employment to 2024.The fourth woman says the singer began assaulting her in 2007 when she traveled with him to his Las Vegas home.None of the women is named in the suit, which is common in cases involving claims of sexual assault.The suit, which is seeking at least $50 million in damages, says none of the women reported the assaults at the time because they were intimidated by Robinson’s celebrity, and feared attacks on their character.Robinson’s wife, Frances, who is also named in the lawsuit for allegedly creating a hostile work environment and ignoring her husband’s behavior, told AFP the suit had come as a surprise.”I’m as shocked as you are,” she said when reached by telephone, but declined to go into details.Robinson was one of the founding members of The Miracles, a Detroit-based outfit that came together in the 1950s.The group had dozens of chart hits, including the smash “The Tears of a Clown” in 1967.
AP to continue crediting ‘Napalm Girl’ photo to Nick Ut after probe
The Associated Press news agency will continue to credit one of its most distinctive photos, “Napalm Girl” taken during the Vietnam War, to photographer Nick Ut despite questions about who took it, the wire said Tuesday.The black and white photo of a severely burned Vietnamese girl, running naked down a road after a 1972 napalm attack in southern Vietnam helped alter perceptions of the war and remains a potent reminder of its devastation. Vietnamese American AP photographer Huynh Cong Ut, better known as Nick Ut, won a Pulitzer Prize and a World Press Photo award for the image. Ut claims the photo as his own.The photo’s subject, Kim Phuc Phan Thi, who became Canadian, has continued to bear witness to her ordeal as an adult. But in January, “The Stringer” documentary screened at the Sundance Film Festival credited the image to Vietnamese freelance journalist Nguyen Thanh Nghe. After a nearly year-long investigation, the news agency published a 97-page report Tuesday concluding “it is possible Nick Ut took the photo.””However, that cannot be proven definitively due to the passage of time, the death of many of the key players involved and the limitations of technology. New findings uncovered during this investigation do raise unanswered questions and AP remains open to the possibility that Ut did not take this photo,” it said.”The AP has concluded that there is not the definitive evidence required by AP’s standards to change the credit of the 53-year-old photograph.”The agency concluded it is “likely” the photo was taken with a Pentax camera, while Ut stated in interviews he carried two Leica and two Nikon cameras that day.In “The Stringer,” Carl Robinson the AP’s former photo editor in Saigon claimed he lied and altered the caption of the image under orders from Saigon photo chief Horst Faas.”Nick Ut came with me on the assignment. But he didn’t take that photo… That photo was mine,” said Nguyen Thanh Nghe, who stated in the film that he was certain he took the photo.AP insisted in its report “no proof has been found that Nguyen took the picture.”Ut remained with the AP for 45 years, leaving Saigon to later work for the wire in Los Angeles, until his retirement in 2017.
Les députés s’invectivent lors de l’examen d’un texte contre l’antisémitisme à l’université
Les députés ont commencé mardi à discuter d’une proposition de loi pour lutter contre l’antisémitisme dans l’enseignement supérieur, sans pour autant aller très loin dans son examen, lors d’une séance tendue où ont fusé les accusations et les invectives.Seul le premier article du texte, qui avait été adopté à l’unanimité au Sénat, a pu être voté mardi à l’Assemblée, le reste de la discussion devant reprendre mercredi après-midi. Cet article premier prévoit d’inscrire la sensibilisation à la lutte contre l’antisémitisme et le racisme parmi les missions de formation des établissements. Le texte, porté par Pierre Henriet (Horizons) et Constance Le Grip (groupe macroniste Ensemble pour la République), entend par ailleurs renforcer les dispositifs de prévention et de signalement, en rendant obligatoire au sein de chaque établissement des “référents” dédiés à la lutte contre le racisme et l’antisémitisme.”Pas un seul étudiant ne doit hésiter à se rendre en cours parce qu’il craint d’être exposé à l’antisémitisme”, a martelé en ouverture des débats le ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur Philippe Baptiste.”Depuis le 7 octobre 2023, nous avons assisté à une augmentation alarmante des actes antisémites dans notre société, et l’enseignement supérieur, malheureusement, n’a pas été épargné”, a-t-il ajouté.Les débats se sont tendus au fil de la soirée. La France insoumise, seul groupe à avoir voté contre l’article premier, souhaitait le réécrire en utilisant la définition des discriminations du code pénal, ne contenant pas le mot d’antisémitisme. Les Insoumis, qui ont aussi critiqué le manque de moyens pour les nouvelles formations, ont été accusés de vouloir “invisibiliser” l’antisémitisme par des députés de droite, d’extrême droite et macronistes. La ministre chargée de la lutte contre les discriminations Aurore Bergé a également interpellé les Insoumis, les accusant de “stratégie électorale” et de “faire monter” la “peur” vis-à-vis “de nos compatriotes juifs”. La cheffe de file des députés LFI, Mathilde Panot l’a accusée en retour de “tordre entièrement les faits” et “d’instrumentaliser l’antisémitisme pour faire taire les voix pour la paix sur le génocide en Palestine”.- Procédure disciplinaire -Les députés n’examineront que mercredi l’article 3 du texte, qui fait encore davantage débat que les premiers. Supprimé lors de son examen en commission à l’Assemblée, il prévoit la création d’une “section disciplinaire commune” aux établissements d’une même région académique, présidée par un membre de la juridiction administrative. Le co-rapporteur Pierre Henriet – qui a rappelé que neuf étudiants juifs sur dix disent avoir subi des actes antisémites à l’université, selon un sondage de l’Union des étudiants juifs de France – entend défendre la réintroduction par amendement de cette disposition. Elle permettrait selon lui aux chefs d’établissements d’externaliser le processus disciplinaire sur les dossiers les plus sensibles.”Le renforcement de la procédure disciplinaire est nécessaire”, ces démarches étant souvent “trop longues”, et “les actes antisémites, trop rarement sanctionnés”, a estimé la députée MoDem Géraldine Bannier. Mais la gauche est elle opposée à cet article 3. “La volonté de professionnaliser la justice disciplinaire par le recours à un juge administratif rompt avec la tradition des universités autonomes”, a fustigé le député écologiste Steevy Gustave.Le communiste Jean-Paul Lecoq a lui critiqué la liste des faits passibles d’une sanction disciplinaire ajoutée au code de l’éducation par le même article, comportant notamment “les faits susceptibles de porter atteinte à l’ordre, au bon fonctionnement de l’établissement”. Des dispositions qui risquent selon lui “de porter atteinte aux droits et à la liberté de manifestation des étudiants”.
US, Chinese officials to hold trade talks in Switzerland
Senior US and Chinese officials will travel to Switzerland later this week to kickstart stalled trade talks following President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff rollout, according to statements from both countries.The talks mark the first official public engagement between the world’s two largest economies to resolve a trade war escalated by Trump shortly after his return to office in January.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and US Trade Representative (USTR) Jamieson Greer will attend the talks on behalf of the United States, their offices said.Bessent told Fox News that the sides would hold meetings on Saturday and Sunday intended to lay the groundwork for future negotiations. “We will agree what we’re going to talk about. My sense is that this will be about de-escalation, not about the big trade deal,” Bessent told “The Ingraham Angle” show.”We’ve got to de-escalate before we can move forward,” he added.Vice Premier He Lifeng will attend for Beijing, China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced.”Vice Premier He, as the Chinese lead person for China-U.S. economic and trade affairs, will have a meeting with the U.S. lead person Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent,” the Chinese foreign ministry said.The USTR announced that Greer would also meet with “his counterpart from the People’s Republic of China to discuss trade matters,” without naming He. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, his administration has levied new tariffs totaling 145 percent on goods from China, with some sector-specific measures stacked on top.Beijing retaliated by slapping 125 levies on US imports to China, along with more targeted measures.The tit-for-tat tariffs have left the two nations with cripplingly high levies that have shocked financial markets and reportedly caused a sharp slowdown in bilateral trade.”This isn’t sustainable, as I have said before, especially on the Chinese side. 145 percent, 125 percent is the equivalent of an embargo. We don’t want to decouple. What we want is fair trade,” Bessent said.




