AFP USA

An explosive docuseries about Sean “Diddy” Combs — produced by his longtime rival 50 Cent — has been released on Netflix, despite the disgraced music mogul’s attempts to block its airing.The four-part “Sean Combs: The Reckoning” chronicles the career and dramatic fall of the 56-year-old rapper and record executive, who was sentenced in October to 50 months in prison for prostitution-related crimes.During his trial, a New York court heard how he coerced his former girlfriend Casandra Ventura into performing so-called “freak offs” — sexual marathons with hired men that Combs directed and sometimes filmed.The Netflix series features interviews with other associates who detail his allegedly predatory behavior, as well as with two people who claim that the hip-hop star sexually assaulted them.Combs’s lawyers had sought to halt the show’s Tuesday release, sending a cease and desist letter to Netflix a day earlier claiming an apparent copyright violation.They point to footage in the show of Combs speaking with his legal team days before his September 2024 arrest, in which he urges them to “find somebody that will work with us, that has dealt in the dirtiest of dirty business of media and propaganda.”Juda Engelmayer, Combs’s spokesperson, told AFP that the artist had been capturing the video to “tell his own story, in his own way.””It is fundamentally unfair, and illegal, for Netflix to misappropriate that work.”Netflix, in a statement cited by the Washington Post, said the footage of Combs was legally obtained.Engelmayer also complained that rapper Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson was allowed to executive produce the documentary series, calling him a “longtime adversary with a personal vendetta who has spent too much time slandering Mr Combs.”The pair have a feud that dates back to the mid-2000s, when 50 Cent released a diss track accusing Combs of knowing who murdered famed rapper The Notorious B.I.G. in 1997.Combs was convicted in July of two counts of transporting people across state lines for prostitution. But a jury acquitted him of the most serious charges: sex trafficking and racketeering.He is currently being held in a low-security federal prison some 80 miles (130 kilometers) south of New York. He is due to be released in May 2028.

President Donald Trump said Wednesday he believes Russia’s Vladimir Putin wants to end the Ukraine war despite inconclusive talks in Moscow, as US officials prepared for a follow-up meeting with Kyiv’s top negotiator.Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner huddled into the early hours with Putin in the Kremlin but reached no breakthrough on halting Europe’s worst conflict since World War II.The Kremlin said afterward it found parts of the US plan to end the war unacceptable, even though the proposal includes Ukraine ceding parts of the eastern Donbas region it still holds nearly four years after Russia’s invasion.”I can tell you that they had a reasonably good meeting with President Putin,” Trump said when an AFP reporter asked him about the talks, adding afterwards that the talks were “very good.”Trump said it was too soon to tell what would happen “because it does take two to tango.”Pressed on whether Witkoff and Kushner got any sense that Putin genuinely wanted to halt Russia’s nearly four-year-old invasion, Trump replied: “He would like to end the war. That was their impression.”Trump added that Ukraine “pretty well” backed the US proposal, although he added that Kyiv should have done so earlier when he had a notoriously heated meeting with President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval office in February.Witkoff and Kushner were now due to meet top Ukrainian negotiator Rustem Umerov in Florida on Thursday, two US officials told AFP, to follow up on the Kremlin talks.- ‘Successes of the Russian army’ -But while the White House had voiced optimism ahead of the Kremlin talks, Moscow said that the two sides had failed to reach a compromise and that more work was needed.The Kremlin added Wednesday that its army’s recent battlefield successes in Ukraine had bolstered its position and that Kyiv’s ties to NATO remained a key question.Russia’s advance in eastern Ukraine gathered pace last month and Putin has said in recent days that Moscow is ready to fight on to seize the rest of the land it claims if Kyiv does not surrender it.”The progress and nature of the negotiations were influenced by the successes of the Russian army on the battlefield in recent weeks,” Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov, who took part in the US-Russia talks, told reporters, including AFP.Moscow insisted it was incorrect to say Putin rejected the plan in its entirety.It also said Russia was still committed to diplomacy, despite Putin’s stark warning earlier this week that Moscow was prepared to fight Europe if it wanted war.”We are still ready to meet as many times as is needed to reach a peace settlement,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. – ‘Opportunity to end the war’ -In Kyiv, Zelensky said that though a window of opportunity for peace has opened, it must be accompanied by pressure on Moscow. “The world now clearly feels that there is an opportunity to end the war, and the current activity in negotiations must be supported by pressure on Russia,” he said in a regular evening address. The fresh talks come as NATO pledges to buy hundreds of millions of dollars worth of US arms for Kyiv. NATO chief Mark Rutte said it was positive that peace talks were ongoing, but that the alliance should make sure that “Ukraine is in the strongest possible position to keep the fight going”.Russian troops have been grinding forward across the front line against outgunned and outnumbered Ukrainian forces.Earlier this week, Moscow claimed to have captured the important stronghold of Pokrovsk, but a Ukrainian army unit fighting in the city said urban combat was still ongoing.European countries have expressed fears Washington and Moscow will reach agreements without them and have spent the last weeks trying to amend the US plan so that it does not force Kyiv to capitulate. burs-dk

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) launched an immigration crackdown on Wednesday in New Orleans, the latest Democratic-run city to be targeted by the Trump administration.”The men and women of DHS law enforcement have landed in The Big Easy,” DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said on X, using the nickname for the Louisiana city.Noem said Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents “will remove the worst of the worst from New Orleans, Louisiana, after the city’s sanctuary politicians have ignored the rule of law.”Sanctuary policies enacted by the local authorities in New Orleans limit the cooperation of local law enforcement with federal immigration agents.The DHS crackdown in New Orleans comes a day after President Donald Trump said he plans to send National Guard troops to the southern US city, an action he has taken previously in Los Angeles, Washington and Memphis.”We’re going to New Orleans pretty soon,” Trump said. “The governor called me. He’d like to have us go there. He’s asked for help in New Orleans and we’re going to go there in a couple of weeks.”Trump has said the troops are needed in the cities to combat crime and assist with the sweeping immigration crackdown he pledged to carry out during his White House campaign. Critics dispute that, with the mayors of Los Angeles and Memphis both saying the troops are not needed.The governor of Louisiana is a Republican but the mayor-elect of New Orleans is a Democrat.Mayor-elect Helena Moreno, who takes up her post on January 12, expressed concern on Wednesday about how immigration raids have been carried out in other cities.”Do we want the most violent criminals off of our streets? Absolutely. Yes,” Moreno was quoted as saying by NOLA.com. “I don’t think anyone is going to object to that.”But what we’ve been seeing across the country and in other cities is that Border Patrol appears to be targeting brown people and potentially violating even some of their due process rights.”She also expressed concern about federal agents concealing their faces with masks and not being readily identifiable, NOLA.com reported.”If you are a masked person and not necessarily identifiable as an officer, you’re coming up on people and grabbing them, it can be a real safety issue for everyone around, including the Border Patrol or ICE agent,” Moreno said.- ‘Restoring law and order’ -DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said the New Orleans operation would target “illegal criminal aliens” wanted for “home invasion, armed robbery, grand theft auto, and rape.””Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, we are restoring law and order for the American people,” McLaughlin said in a statement.The Trump administration claims that most of the undocumented migrants swept up in the immigration crackdown have committed or are wanted for crimes.The Cato Institute, in a study published last month, said however that only five percent of those taken into ICE custody since October 1 had a violent criminal conviction and 73 percent had no criminal conviction at all.

US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he believes Vladimir Putin wants to end the Ukraine war, despite talks between the Russian president and American negotiators ending without a deal.Trump’s envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner negotiated into the early hours with Putin in the Kremlin but reached no breakthrough for a settlement to end Europe’s worst conflict since World War II.The Kremlin said Wednesday that its army’s recent battlefield successes in Ukraine had bolstered its position, adding that the two sides failed to find a “compromise” and that Kyiv’s ties to NATO remained a key question.”I thought they had a very good meeting yesterday with President Putin,” Trump said when an AFP reporter asked him in the Oval Office how the negotiations had gone.”What comes out of that meeting? I can’t tell you, because it does take two to tango.”Pressed on whether Witkoff and Kushner got any sense that Putin genuinely wanted to halt Russia’s nearly four-year-old invasion, Trump replied: “He would like to end the war. That was their impression.””Their impression was very strongly that he’d like to make a deal,” he added.Witkoff and Kushner brought an updated version of a US plan to end the war, which included Ukraine ceding parts of the eastern Donbas region and agreeing not to join NATO.- ‘Successes of the Russian army’ -But while the White House had voiced optimism ahead of the Kremlin talks, Moscow said afterward it had found parts of the plan unacceptable.Russia’s advance in eastern Ukraine gathered pace last month and Putin has said in recent days that Moscow is ready to fight on to seize the rest of the land it claims if Kyiv does not surrender it.”The progress and nature of the negotiations were influenced by the successes of the Russian army on the battlefield in recent weeks,” Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov, who took part in the US-Russia talks, told reporters, including AFP.Moscow insisted it was incorrect to say Putin rejected the plan in its entirety.It also said Russia was still committed to diplomacy, despite Putin’s stark warning that Moscow was prepared to fight Europe if it wanted war.”We are still ready to meet as many times as is needed to reach a peace settlement,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said. Trump said Ukraine was “pretty well” on board with a US-backed proposal to end the conflict, but said Kyiv should have agreed to a deal when he had an angry encounter with President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office back in February.”When I was in his office and I talked about no cards, I said, ‘you have no cards,’ that was the time to settle,” he added.- ‘Opportunity to end the war’ -The fresh talks come as NATO pledges to buy hundreds of millions of dollars worth of US arms for Kyiv. NATO chief Mark Rutte said it was positive that peace talks were ongoing, but that the alliance should make sure that “Ukraine is in the strongest possible position to keep the fight going”.Zelensky said that though a window of opportunity for peace has opened, it must be accompanied by pressure on Moscow. “The world now clearly feels that there is an opportunity to end the war, and the current activity in negotiations must be supported by pressure on Russia,” he said in a regular evening address. Russian troops have been grinding forward across the front line against outgunned and outnumbered Ukrainian forces.Earlier this week, Moscow claimed to have captured the important stronghold of Pokrovsk, but a Ukrainian army unit fighting in the city said urban combat was still ongoing.European countries have expressed fears Washington and Moscow will reach agreements without them and have spent the last weeks trying to amend the US plan so that it does not force Kyiv to capitulate. burs-dk/md

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday a reset of Joe Biden’s fuel-economy standards, arguing it will lower US car prices — but critics warned it would worsen climate change and leave drivers paying more at the pump.Trump was flanked in the Oval Office by the CEOs of Ford and Stellantis and a senior General Motors official, a show of buy-in from Detroit’s “Big Three.””My administration is taking historic action to lower costs for American consumers, protect American auto jobs and make buying a car much more affordable,” the US president said.”Today is a victory (for) common sense and affordability,” Ford CEO Jim Farley chipped in.Environmentalists quickly pushed back, saying the windback stood out even among Trump’s many anti-green actions because of its outsized impact on car-dependent America.”Trump is taking a wrecking ball to the biggest single step any nation has ever taken to combat oil use, global warming pollution, and helping save consumers money at the gas pump,” Dan Becker, an activist with the Center for Biological Diversity, told AFP. At stake are the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, created in 1975 in response to the Arab oil embargo, which require vehicles to achieve the “maximum feasible” mileage per gallon. Under the proposed rule, the administration would roll back past and planned efficiency increases, targeting a fleetwide average of 34.5 miles per gallon by model year 2031 — “no better than what American cars are getting today,” said Becker, noting CAFE figures overstate real-world mileage by roughly 25 percent.Trump’s Department of Transport argues that Biden officials improperly factored in electric and hybrid vehicles, saying the standards would be unattainable for gasoline-powered cars and would effectively force a shift in the market.Gina McCarthy, a former senior official under Biden and Barack Obama, countered the move would not only worsen climate change but harm the auto industry by slowing its shift to electric vehicles.”The rest of the world will continue to innovate and create cleaner cars that people want to buy and drive, while we’re forced to sit in our clunkers, paying more for gas, and pumping out more tailpipe emissions.”- Trump EV fight -Trump has railed against what he calls an EV “mandate” — a stance that puts him at odds with his on-again, off-again billionaire ally Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO whose company still dominates the US EV market.Republicans in Congress have repealed clean-energy tax credits in a major tax and spending bill, and targeted California’s ability to set its own vehicle-emission limits.Throughout 2025, GM and other US automakers have curtailed or pushed back new EV plant capacity.But whether savings from reduced EV investment will filter through to consumers remains unclear.While the shift away from EVs does allow automakers to delay or forego billions of dollars in new investments, some funds are being steered into new initiatives to add US carbuilding capacity in light of Trump’s tariffs.”Meeting high fuel economy standards has been challenging for the auto industry and has added to vehicle cost,” Charlie Chesbrough, an analyst with Cox Automotive, told AFP.”However, consumers like fuel-efficient vehicles. This year traditional hybrids are up double digits from last year while gas vehicles are basically flat,” he added.”Since most consumers don’t have transportation alternatives available, people fear high gas prices. And good MPG is a way to mitigate that risk.”

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith was summoned on Wednesday to appear before a Republican-led House committee looking into his prosecution of US President Donald Trump.Representative Jim Jordan, the Republican chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, issued a subpoena to Smith ordering him to testify on December 17.Smith had requested that his testimony be delivered in public, but the committee has opted instead to have him deposed behind closed doors.Trump was accused by Smith of mishandling classified documents after leaving the White House and plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.Neither case came to trial and Smith — in line with a Justice Department policy of not prosecuting a sitting president — dropped them both after Trump won the November 2024 presidential election.Trump, speaking to reporters at the White House on Wednesday, called Smith a “thug” and an “evil man” and said he would like to see him testify publicly.”I’d rather see him testify publicly, because there’s no way he can answer the questions,” he said.Since taking office for the second time, Trump has urged the Justice Department to bring cases against Smith and a number of other perceived political opponents.Cases brought against Trump foes James Comey, a former FBI director, and New York Attorney General Letitia James collapsed last month after a judge ruled that the prosecutor who brought the charges was unlawfully appointed.- ‘Full unvarnished truth’ -Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, criticized the decision by the Republicans on the oversight panel not to allow Smith to testify publicly.”What are our colleagues so afraid of, that they won’t let the American people hear directly from the Special Counsel?” Raskin said in a statement.”The American people deserve to hear the full unvarnished truth about Special Counsel Smith’s years-long effort to investigate and prosecute the crimes committed by Donald Trump and his co-conspirators,” he said.”Judiciary Committee Republicans want to force the Special Counsel into the shadows of a backroom interrogation and subject him to the tiresome and loathsome partisan tactics of leak-and-distort, when the American public is demanding transparency and a public hearing,” Raskin added.Peter Koski, Smith’s lawyer, also expressed disappointment that his client would not be allowed to testify publicly.”Nearly six weeks ago Jack offered to voluntarily appear before the House Judiciary committee in an open hearing to answer any questions lawmakers have about his investigation into President Trump’s alleged efforts to unlawfully overturn the election results and retention of classified documents,” Koski said in a statement to US media.”We are disappointed that offer was rejected, and that the American people will be denied the opportunity to hear directly from Jack on these topics,” Koski added.

Jared Isaacman, US President Donald Trump’s two-time appointee to lead NASA, said it was his goal that the United States beat rival China in the race to return humans to the Moon, during a Senate confirmation hearing Wednesday.Isaacman, 42, a billionaire entrepreneur and private astronaut who is a close associate of Elon Musk, appeared during a rare second confirmation hearing that followed Trump’s re-nomination of him in November for the top post at the US space agency.Isaacman told senators that, if confirmed for the job, he would ensure the success of the Artemis lunar exploration program started in 2017, during Trump’s first administration. “America will return to the Moon before our great rival, and we will establish an enduring presence to understand and realize the scientific, economic and national security value on the lunar surface,” Isaacman said.His nomination — first announced after Trump won the 2024 election, then withdrawn in April 2025 and again reissued last month — reflects the president’s on-again, off-again relationship with Musk, the world’s richest man and founder of SpaceX, among other ventures.”I have to say for a moment, (this) feels a bit like Groundhog Day,” Republican Senator Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, said as he opened the hearing.Trump’s decision to withdraw Isaacman’s first nomination took place as the president feuded in the spring with Musk, who had headed Trump’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But Trump and Musk appear to have since reconciled.- Second space race –It has been 53 years since humans last landed on the surface of the Moon. In a Cold War space race with the Soviet Union, the US last completed that feat with its Apollo 17 mission in December 1972. During his first confirmation hearing in April, Isaacman stated that he wanted to prioritize sending astronauts to Mars. But on Wednesday, he spoke more cautiously about Mars and more strongly emphasized the goal of returning a manned US mission to the Moon as soon as possible.NASA’s Artemis program to return to the Moon, however, has faced numerous delays in recent years. Experts warned in September that the lunar lander developed by Musk’s SpaceX might not be ready in time.Such a complication would put the United States at risk of being overtaken by China, which also aims to reach the Moon by 2030, Trump’s appointee indicated at Wednesday’s hearing.”I think it’s imperative that we do so, and failing to do so calls into question American exceptionalism beyond just our expertise in the high ground of space,” Isaacman said.While the Trump administration was open several months ago to revising the Artemis program in favor of Mars, this prospect now seems to be fading.Since the rift between the US president and billionaire Elon Musk, who is obsessed with the red planet, US authorities have been emphasizing their determination to outpace Beijing in what they call the “second space race.”If confirmed to head NASA, Isaacman would need to ensure that SpaceX delivers the lunar lander on time.Isaacman made his fortune in online payments as the founder and CEO of Shift4. He has flown two private space missions aboard Musk’s SpaceX rockets and has been a key customer and advocate for the company’s space exploration goals.Asked about a potential conflict of interest with Musk, with whom he is reportedly very close, Isaacman assured that he maintains only professional relations with him.”Senators, I’m not here for a personal gain to favor or enrich contractors,” Isaacman said.

Human rights groups warned Wednesday ahead of the draw for next year’s football World Cup that President Donald Trump’s hardline immigration policies could overshadow the tournament.Organizations including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) cautioned against raids outside US arenas. They urged the sport’s governing body, FIFA, to deliver on its promises to safeguard workers, fans and journalists.”Families, fans, players and other members of the football community have the right to enjoy the game without the fear of being detained and separated from their loved ones,” Daniel Norona, Amnesty International USA’s Americas advocacy director, told a joint news conference.The World Cup will be co-hosted by the United States, Mexico and Canada in June and July 2026. The draw for the 48-nation tournament will be held Friday in Washington. A Human Rights Watch report Wednesday said that US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested more than 92,000 people between January and October near cities where World Cup games will be played. It noted that an asylum seeker in the United States was detained before the Club World Cup final in July.As part of his mass-deportation drive, Trump has deployed National Guard troops to some cities that will host World Cup matches, such as Chicago and Los Angeles.”We need FIFA and host cities and other entities to make clear whether or not ICE, the National Guard and other federal law enforcement will be at the stadiums,” said Jennifer Li, a professor at Washington’s Georgetown University Law Center. “This isn’t just kind of hypothetical.”Human Rights Watch’s Minky Worden expressed particular concern over the administration’s revocation of temporary legal protections for migrants from Haiti, a country that earned its first World Cup berth in more than 50 years.”These policies put communities at risk and threaten to undermine the integrity of the tournament itself,” said Jamil Dakwar, director of the ACLU’s human rights program.”Without action today, FIFA risks becoming a stage for authoritarianism.”- A new award – The groups also warned about access for journalists, including overseas reporters seeking entry into the United States, and protections for workers and fans from abuse and discrimination.They noted that homophobic chants were heard at a July Club World Cup match in Atlanta. Complicating their efforts is Trump’s seemingly close relationship with FIFA president Gianni Infantino, who has made repeated White House visits and is slated to unveil an inaugural FIFA Peace Prize at Friday’s draw that onlookers have speculated could go to Trump.”The relationship is too close for comfort,” said the NAACP’s Jamal Watkins.”When Infantino aligns with Donald Trump, then you literally are sending a signal not only to the United States, but to the world, that all of the practices and policies that are coming out of this administration are OK.”In a letter sent to FIFA last month, Human Rights Watch petitioned the governing body for the criteria used to determine a winner, a list of nominees and judges, and whether human rights considerations would inform the decision. Worden said they have not received an answer.”Gianni Infantino has said that this FIFA Peace Prize represents five billion fans of football around the world,” she said. “How were the five billion fans of football consulted?”

Biopic “Peter Hujar’s Day” on Wednesday topped the nominations for the Spirit Awards, which also saw singer SZA given a nod for her debut film role.The awards honor lower budget movies and are among the first significant pre-Oscars galas to unveil their shortlists.”Peter Hujar’s Day,” which premiered at Sundance this year, bagged five nods, including best feature, best director and best lead performance.It stars American Ben Whishaw as the titular character, a photographer in 1970s New York, in conversation with his friend, played by Rebecca Hall.There were four nominations each for “Train Dreams,” “Blue Sun Palace,” “Sorry, Baby,” “Lurker” and “One of Them Days.”Netflix’s “Train Dreams” — based on Denis Johnson’s novella — charts the flux of early 20th century America through the life of a logger and railroad worker. It scored nominations for best feature, best director and best lead performer Joel Edgerton.”Blue Sun Palace,” a best first feature and best first screenplay nomination for Constance Tsang, recounts the bond between two Chinese migrants in New York as they grapple with tragedy.”Sorry, Baby” — nominated for best feature, screenplay and best director — is a black comedy drama about the aftermath of an assault at a liberal arts college.”Lurker,” a psychological thriller set around a rising star, will compete for best first feature and for the gender-neutral best lead performance for Theodore Pellerin.Comedy “One of Them Days” scored a best breakthrough performance nod for singer SZA, one of two friends — opposite Keke Palmer — who has to scramble to come up with the rent after an irresponsible boyfriend splurges it.Movies with budgets over $30 million are not considered for the Film Independent Spirit Awards, which aim to celebrate independent movies.The awards will be handed out at a ceremony at the Hollywood Palladium on February 15th.Oscars voting ends on March 5, and the season-capping 98th Academy Awards take place on March 15.

President Donald Trump is poised to roll back his predecessor Joe Biden’s tough fuel-economy standards, arguing the move will lower car prices even as critics warn it will leave drivers paying more at the pump and accelerate climate change.Trump will be joined in the Oval Office on Wednesday by the CEOs of Ford and Stellantis, and a General Motors manager, to announce the rollback — with the presence of the so-called “Big Three” automakers signaling critical industry buy-in.”Joe Biden’s fuel efficiency regulations would have raised the cost of a new vehicle by $1,000,” the White House said on X, adding that Trump’s reset would save Americans $109 billion.”As America’s largest auto producer, we appreciate President Trump’s leadership in aligning fuel economy standards with market realities,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a statement.Environmentalists quickly pushed back, saying the move stood out even among Trump’s many anti-green actions because of its outsized impact on car-dependent America.”Trump is taking a wrecking ball to the biggest single step any nation has ever taken to combat oil use, global warming pollution, and helping save consumers money at the gas pump,” Dan Becker, an activist with the Center for Biological Diversity who has campaigned for green car policies since the 1980s, told AFP. “This is the big one.”At stake are the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, created in 1975 in response to the Arab oil embargo, which require vehicles to achieve the “maximum feasible” mileage per gallon.The full extent of the rollback was not immediately clear.But the Trump administration has repeatedly signaled its opposition to efficiency increases enacted under Biden’s administration, which it boosted by eight percent for model years 2024–2025 and 10 percent for 2026, targeting more than 50 miles per gallon by 2031.In a proposed rule issued in June, Trump’s Department of Transport argued that Biden officials had improperly factored in electric and hybrid vehicles when devising those targets, saying the standards would be unattainable for gasoline-powered cars and would effectively force a shift in the market.Becker called that argument “ludicrous” because it would force automakers to ignore that advanced technology exists. – Trump EV fight -Trump has railed against what he calls an EV “mandate” — an issue that has put him at odds with his on-again, off-again billionaire ally Elon Musk, the CEO and largest shareholder of Tesla, which still has the highest EV market share in the US even as other brands are gaining.Republicans in Congress have repealed clean-energy tax credits in a major tax and spending bill, and targeted California’s ability to set its own vehicle-emission limits.Throughout 2025, GM and other US automakers have curtailed or pushed back new EV plant capacity.But whether savings from reduced EV investment will filter through to consumers remains unclear.While the shift away from EVs does allow automakers to delay or forgo billions of dollars in new investments, some of those funds are being steered into new initiatives to add US carbuilding capacity in light of Trump’s tariffs.GM, for example, announced in June $4 billion in spending to retool factories in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee. GM, which has said it expects a $3.5 billion — $4.5 billion tariff hit in 2025, has also placed a heavy priority on returning excess cash to shareholders.Gina McCarthy, a former senior official under Biden and Barack Obama, said the move would ultimately harm the auto industry by slowing its shift to electric vehicles and worsen climate change.”The rest of the world will continue to innovate and create cleaner cars that people want to buy and drive, while we’re forced to sit in our clunkers, paying more for gas, and pumping out more tailpipe emissions.”