AFP USA

President Donald Trump’s nominee to be the top US military officer will testify Tuesday before a Senate hearing, where he will likely be grilled about his readiness for the job given his lack of required experience.Democrats have sharply criticized the dismissal of general CQ Brown — the previous chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — and other senior officers, accusing Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth of seeking to ensure the military is led by people loyal to the president.In an unusual move, Trump nominated Dan Caine, a retired lieutenant general, to replace Brown earlier this year.Nominees for chair of the Joint Chiefs must have served as the head of a military branch, as a commander of a combatant command or as vice chair — none of which Caine has done — but the president may waive that requirement.Caine has served in positions including associate director for military affairs at the CIA as well as in various operational and staff roles, and flew more than 150 hours in combat as an F-16 pilot, an aircraft in which he logged more than 2,800 hours in total.A military official who served with Caine said shortly after Trump announced his nomination that the retired general has “never been a partisan actor, always been apolitical and focused on just simply warfighting and whatever the mission success is.”- ‘Razin’ Caine -Trump has described Caine as “an accomplished pilot, national security expert, successful entrepreneur, and a ‘warfighter’ with significant interagency and special operations experience.”The president apparently became enamored of Caine after meeting him in Iraq during his first term, where the general told Trump that his nickname was “Razin.””I said, wait a minute, your name is Razin Caine? I love you, I’ve been looking for you for five years… this is what I want,” Trump told an investor forum in February.Trump abruptly fired Brown without explanation, leaving the vice chair to lead the Joint Chiefs in an acting capacity.Hegseth said following Brown’s dismissal that the general is “an honorable man” but “not the right man for the moment.”In addition to Brown, top US Navy officer admiral Lisa Franchetti, the Air Force vice chief of staff and three senior military lawyers have also been sacked.Hegseth has insisted the president is simply choosing the leaders he wants, but Democratic lawmakers including Jack Reed — the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee — have raised concerns about the potential politicization of the traditionally apolitical US military.

Donald Trump’s tumultuous return to the White House will face a popularity test Tuesday with an election in Wisconsin that has seen the US president’s most high-profile aide Elon Musk doling out million-dollar checks to voters.Since taking power in January, Trump has overseen radical reform, moving to dismantle swaths of the federal government, upending foreign policy and launching trade wars that threaten to reignite inflation.The president’s targeting of migrants, judges, “woke” culture and any critics have been lauded by his supporters, but have not yet faced a major test among voters.Wisconsin’s election of a judge to join the state’s supreme court pits conservative Brad Schimel against liberal Susan Crawford.The outgoing judge was backed by Democrats, so a Schimel win would tilt the court right, while Crawford would preserve its liberal leanings.Musk has argued that a conservative win is needed to cement Trump’s national agenda, with the supreme court race having an impact on a potential redrawing of Congressional districts in the swing state ahead of midterm elections next year.Trump’s Republican party in Washington holds a slim 218-213 majority in the House of Representatives over Democrats, and an even slimmer lead in the Senate.Trump attacked Crawford on social media on Monday, accusing her of “letting child molesters and rapists off easy.””She will be one of the most Liberal Judges ever elected, which would be a DISASTER for Wisconsin and, the United States of America,” he said.Also on Tuesday, voters in Florida will elect members of the House in two heavily Republican districts, which were vacated by Trump’s National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and his original nominee for attorney general, Matt Gaetz.- Most expensive race -The Wisconsin poll is expected to be close, with Trump narrowly beating his Democratic rival Kamala Harris in last year’s presidential election by less than 30,000 votes in the state.Musk, who spent roughly $277 million on Trump’s election campaign, has piled more resources into the Wisconsin vote. He has handed out two prize checks of $1 million each to voters, and also given $100 each to voters who sign his petition against “activist judges.”According to the Brennan Center for Justice, more than $49.7 million has been spent by Schimel and his backers, including $12.2 million from Musk’s America PAC.Crawford’s campaign and those backing her have spent an estimated $40.3 million.The spending has made the Wisconsin race the most expensive in US judicial history, the center said.Crawford has accused Tesla owner Musk of seeking to buy a seat on the state supreme court to swing judgments in favor of his companies.A case regarding car dealerships filed by the electric vehicle manufacturer is potentially headed to the court.Speaking at a campaign rally on Sunday, Musk placed the national political context front and center.”What’s happening on Tuesday is a vote for which party controls the US House of Representatives,” Musk declared, arguing that the Congress was so evenly balanced that Wisconsin’s seats could decide its majority in the 2026 midterms.The billionaire’s Green Bay rally had an enthusiastic crowd, but the South African-born oligarch’s role in Wisconsin elections has provoked as much resistance as support. At a pro-Crawford rally, 65-year-old retired electrical engineer Rob Patterson held up a sign showing Musk giving a straight-armed salute. “Our Supreme Court is not for sale,” the sign read.

The US government will review $9 billion of funding for Harvard University over alleged anti-Semitism on campus, authorities said Monday, after it cut millions from Columbia University, which has also seen fierce pro-Palestinian student protests.President Donald Trump has aggressively targeted prestigious universities that saw bitter protests sparked by Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, stripping their federal funds and directing immigration officers to deport foreign student demonstrators, including those with green cards.Officials would look at $255.6 million in contracts between Harvard and the government, as well as $8.7 billion in multi-year grant commitments to the prestigious Ivy League institution, the General Services Administration said in a statement.Critics argue that the Trump administration’s campaign is retributive and will have a chilling effect on free speech, while its supporters insist it is necessary to restore order to campuses and to protect Jewish students.Education Secretary Linda McMahon said “Harvard’s failure to protect students on campus from anti-Semitic discrimination — all while promoting divisive ideologies over free inquiry — has put its reputation in serious jeopardy.” “Harvard can right these wrongs and restore itself to a campus dedicated to academic excellence and truth-seeking, where all students feel safe on its campus,” she added.In a statement, Harvard president Alan Garner said: “If this funding is stopped, it will halt life-saving research and imperil important scientific research and innovation.””The government has informed us that they are considering this action because they are concerned that the University has not fulfilled its obligations to curb and combat antisemitic harassment.”Garner objected to this characterization, saying the university “strengthened our rules and our approach to disciplining those who violate them” over the past 15 months as a means of addressing anti-Semitism on campus.Trump has also targeted New York’s Columbia University, initially putting $400 million of funding under review, detaining for deportation a graduate student linked to the protests, and seeking to arrest others.Columbia then announced a package of concessions to the government around defining anti-Semitism, policing protests and oversight for specific academic departments.They stopped short, however, of meeting some of the more strident demands of the Trump administration, which nonetheless welcomed the Ivy League college’s proposals.”Today’s actions by the Task Force follow a similar ongoing review of Columbia University,” said Monday’s official statement. “That review led to Columbia agreeing to comply with nine preconditions for further negotiations regarding a return of cancelled federal funds.”

Chile’s largest steel plant shut down last year, yielding to cheaper production in China. Now, six months later, the tariffs that President Donald Trump has imposed on US imports of the metal threaten the livelihood of 1.4 million workers in Latin America.As he did during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, Trump is trying to protect American producers by making steel imports costlier with a 25 percent tariff that kicked in on March 12.The United States imports 25 million tons of steel each year, and Canada is it main supplier, followed by Brazil and Mexico, each with products tailored to other industries like car manufacturing and construction.The United States relies on Latin America for specialized steel products, said Ezequiel Tavernelli, head of the Latin American Steel Association, Alacero.With the world awash steel production overcapacity, and China the main offender, the Trump tariffs will distort the market.”The only thing they will bring is a flood of steel” that had been headed to the United States and is now rerouted to regions that are less protected and have less ability to defend themselves, like Latin America, said Tavernelli.To explain the threat he gives these figures: in 2000 China exported less than 100,000 tons of steel a year to Latin America, but today it is more than 14 million tons. The growth is exponential.Steel production in Latin America has been falling for three years. And the Chinese share of what is consumed is getting bigger and bigger .And now, due to the Trump tariffs Latin American producers will not only lose market share in the United States but also miss out in some markets of their own region due to Chinese competition.- When it rains it pours-The numbers are jarring. China accounts for more than 45 percent of the world’s steel production capacity and produces 140 million tons it does not need. It dumps this excess cheaply on the international market, says Alacero, which says China produces 23 percent of the world’s excess steel.”The main problem of our region, and that of the United States, is world steel overcapacity,” Tavernelli told AFP.And China behaves disloyally, he argued, by selling steel below cost thanks to government subsidies.In September of last year Chile endured what Tavernelli is talking about. Its Huachipato steelworks, the country’s largest, shut down its blast furnaces for good.With the smoke that drifted out of its chimneys went nearly 75 years of company history. Chinese steel was 40 percent cheaper and Huachipato simply could not compete.Alacero argues that regionalization of supply chains — for instance, US steel producers, car makers and construction companies buy Latin American steel — “is the best way to defend against disloyal business by China and countries of Southeast Asia.”As Brazil’s vice president Geraldo Alckmin, who is also the minister of development and industry, put it, the region’s goal should be to achieve “economic complementarity.” Brazil and Mexico are negotiating with the United States to try to win exemptions from the US tariffs, and managed to pull this off during Trump’s first term in power.In the same vein, Mexico’s iron and steel producers association, Canacero, said last month there is a high level of production integration between the US and Mexican steel industries and regional benefits should be the priority in the face of the threat of excess capacity of China and Southeast Asia.So there is the risk that more long-standing firms like Huachipato will have to shut down, said Tavernelli, who insisted the countries of Latin America have to work together.

Donald Trump loves few things more than talking about his affinity for tariffs, but it’s nothing new: he’s been saying the same thing for decades.”To me, the most beautiful word in the dictionary is ‘tariff,'” Trump repeatedly said on the campaign trail for the 2024 election.He has since joked that it is now his fourth favorite word, after love, God and family — but his commitment to them remains as strong as ever.The 78-year-old Republican has promised a “Liberation Day” for America on Wednesday when he announces sweeping “reciprocal” tariffs targeting any country that has import levies against US goods.The sudden trade war has sent leading world economies scrambling — yet anyone surprised by the onslaught has not been listening to Trump himself.Other policies have come and gone, especially on hot-button issues such as abortion, but Trump’s belief that America is being ripped off by the world has remained one of his core values.So has his innate conviction that tariffs are the solution, despite arguments by opponents and many economists that US consumers will suffer when importers pass on increased prices.- ‘Ripping off’ -“I am a Tariff Man,” Trump declared in a social media post back in 2018 during his first presidential term.In fact, Trump has been saying as much since the 1980s.His main target then was Japan, as Trump — best known in those days as a brash property dealer and tabloid fixture — discussed getting into politics in an interview with CNN’s Larry King.”A lot of people are tired of watching other countries ripping off the United States,” Trump said in 1987, using rhetoric that has changed little in the intervening 38 years. “Behind our backs, they laugh at us because of our own stupidity.”In a separate interview with chat show host Oprah Winfrey, he raged: “We let Japan come in and dump everything right into our markets.”By the 1990s and early 2000s, China entered his crosshairs, and Beijing remains one of his top tariff targets, along with Canada, Mexico and the European Union.In his successful 2016 election campaign, Trump stepped up the rhetoric, saying: “We can’t continue to allow China to rape our country.” – ‘Very rich’ -During his second term, Trump has also started citing a historical precedent going back more than a century — President William McKinley.McKinley’s passion for both territorial expansion and economic protectionism during his time in office from 1897 to 1901 could have been the model for Trump’s “Make America Great Again” policies.”President McKinley made our country very rich through tariffs and through talent — he was a natural businessman,” Trump said in his inauguration speech in January.Trump’s promises of a “Golden Age” harkens back to the so-called “Gilded Age” that culminated with McKinley’s presidency, a time when America’s population and economy exploded — along with the power of oligarchs.In addition to deploying tariffs, McKinley presided over a period of territorial adventurism for the United States, including the Spanish-American war and the purchases of Guam, Puerto Rico and the Philippines. Such moves echo Trump’s own designs for Greenland, Panama and Canada.The two also share the unwanted similarity of being struck by an assassin’s bullet — although Trump survived the attempt on his life at an election rally last July, while McKinley was killed by an anarchist in 1901.

US President Donald Trump has made tariffs a cornerstone of his trade policy, insisting that they will revive American manufacturing while swelling government coffers.Critics argue that the levies will boost inflation in the near term and weigh on growth, triggering a trade war that could inflict serious damage on the United States and the wider global economy.Trump has imposed tariffs on major trading partners Canada, Mexico and China since returning to the presidency while slapping fresh duties on steel and aluminum imports, with more to come on what he dubbed “Liberation Day” this Wednesday.- What are tariffs? -Tariffs are fees that importing businesses pay for their purchases of foreign goods.When tariffs are imposed, companies must choose between forking out more for foreign goods — and potentially passing those costs on to consumers — or looking for alternatives.The levies bring in revenue for governments imposing them and are commonly used to protect local companies and workers from competition abroad.The charges can make domestic goods more cost-competitive, encouraging buyers to select local producers instead.- Arguments for -Trump’s position is that with tariffs on key imports, companies will move more manufacturing to the United States — or buy US-made products — to avoid additional fees.A commonly-used example is the “chicken tax” of the 1960s, when president Lyndon Johnson pushed back against European tariffs on American poultry with a levy on imported trucks.Today, a 25 percent US tariff remains on light trucks and this is a key reason that most pick-up trucks sold in the country are built in North America.The White House says new tariffs could also bring in more than $6 trillion in federal revenue over the next decade — about $600 billion per year — although it has yet to release its full plans.While US-based companies generally pay the tariffs, White House officials have argued that foreign sellers would absorb the hike by lowering their prices as they seek to do business with the world’s biggest economy.Supporters of Trump’s trade policy also say that tariffs did not cause widespread inflation during his first White House term.- Arguments against -But economists warn that tariff hikes can bring economic pain to affected sectors, and Trump’s stop-start approach to announcing levies has sent financial markets tumbling.If companies are unable to absorb additional fees and foreign sellers decline to lower their prices, the burden of tariffs could flow to other firms or consumers. Trump’s 25 percent tariffs on autos and parts could cause the price of a typical car to surge by $5,000 to $10,000, said Wedbush analysts.Even US automakers producing cars in the country use up to 50 percent of foreign auto parts, they said.”It would take three years to move 10 percent of the auto supply chain to the US and cost hundreds of billions with much complexity and disruption,” Wedbush added.Nationwide chief economist Kathy Bostjancic estimates that recent tariffs on Chinese goods, alongside steel and aluminum imports, would raise construction material prices by up to nine percent.Prices of appliances could also surge up to 15 percent, she said.Trump’s tariffs attract retaliation too, and countermeasures triggered more than $27 billion in US agricultural export losses from mid-2018 to late-2019.The Tax Foundation said: “Based on actual revenue collections data, trade war tariffs have directly increased tax collections by $200 to $300 annually per US household, on average.”These estimates do not account for “lower incomes as tariffs shrink output, nor the loss in consumer choice” as buyers seek tariff-free alternatives, it added.

Fearing a US immigration raid will separate her from her children, an undocumented Honduran immigrant hunkers down in her Washington home, anxiously scouring a WhatsApp group for real-time updates on nearby sweeps.Rosario, a 35-year-old mother of two, practically lives in hiding in the face of US President Donald Trump’s sweeping campaign to arrest and deport millions of undocumented immigrants since his return to the White House in January.Her only lifeline is a community group on the messaging app that provides news about immigration raids in Washington neighborhoods — often mixed with unverified or false information.”You stay informed and stay a little more alert thanks to the group,” Rosario told AFP in her studio apartment, festooned with birthday balloons, stuffed toys, and a wall hanging made from corn husk.”That way, you get rid of fear a little bit — but fear always persists,” said the part-time dishwasher, who crossed into the United States in 2021 after an arduous journey from her home country.Rosario, who refused to disclose her real name, peered through her window blinds for any lurking agents from ICE — the Immigration and Customs Enforcement department, which has been deployed to carry out the Trump administration’s promise to target undocumented immigrants.”Alert: ICE activity was reported at a business center on (Mount) Pleasant around noon,” a message flashed in the group, adding that six masked agents were spotted in the Washington neighborhood and one person was detained.It was not possible for Rosario to ascertain whether the tip was real or fake.Still, she remained confident the community group, fed by other immigrants and advocates, provided reliable information — crucial for determining her limited movements to work and to purchase groceries.- ‘Scary climate’ -Rosario also puzzled over another morsel of unverified information in the group that had not appeared in the mainstream media: that an undocumented female immigrant was detained by ICE at a school in the Bethesda neighborhood.Immigration sweeps on educational institutions are rare, but the Trump administration has said it no longer considers sensitive locations such as schools, churches, and hospitals off-limits to agents. The policy has been legally challenged by religious organizations.Such uncertainty and fear have spawned a flurry of rumors about suspected immigration raids and movements of ICE agents that ricochet across messaging apps and online platforms, leaving immigrant communities on edge.In February, AFP’s fact-checkers debunked a viral online video that claimed to show an undocumented Colombian woman being expelled from the United States. In reality, it was a fictionalized clip posted in 2023 by an American YouTuber.Last month, another online video purportedly showed undocumented immigrants being arrested from a US barbershop. AFP found the video staged, with the uniforms worn by the supposed immigration officials appearing inauthentic.”In the current scary climate, it is hard to know what’s true, what’s inaccurate,” the director of an immigration advocacy group in Washington told AFP, requesting anonymity.The heightened fears among immigrant communities, he added, have made it harder to “decipher fact from fiction.”- ‘Fear grabs you’ –Despite an uptick in immigration arrests, authorities appear to be struggling to meet Trump’s mass deportation goals.The number of deportation flights since Trump took office on January 20 has been roughly the same as those in the final months of President Joe Biden’s administration, US media reported, citing data collected by an immigration rights advocate.That has done little to allay fears among the country’s estimated 14 million undocumented immigrants.Those concerns are aggravated by the government’s shock-and-awe tactics of publicizing raids in major cities and footage of shackled migrants being loaded onto deportation flights.Amid a lack of reliable information and fears of stepped-up raids, many undocumented immigrants have gone underground, with some even withdrawing their children from school, advocacy groups say.Many also remain vulnerable to exploitation by their employers.Elizabeth, an undocumented immigrant and mother of five, avoids the messaging groups filled with unverified information, choosing instead to stay vigilant and aware of her surroundings.”If you don’t know what is happening, fear grabs you,” she told AFP, declining to share her real name and country of origin.”Fear is a product of misinformation.”

President Donald Trump has revoked the licenses that allowed several transnational oil and gas companies to operate in Venezuela despite the country being under US sanctions.After US energy giant Chevron, Washington has ordered a handful of other energy firms, including Spain’s Repsol and France’s Maurel & Prom, to cease operating in Venezuela.Trump, who is seeking to force out authoritarian President Nicolas Maduro, has also announced plans for 25 percent tariffs on imports from any country buying Venezuelan oil and gas.What’s next for the struggling Caribbean country, which has the world’s largest-known oil reserves but has become increasingly isolated since July 2024 elections that President Nicolas Maduro is accused of stealing?- Will the oil stop flowing? -In 2019, during his first term in office, Trump imposed an embargo on Venezuelan oil in response to 2018 elections that were already marred by fraud allegations.Venezuela’s state-owned PDVSA oil giant was in freefall at the time, beset by corruption scandals, mismanagement and a crippling lack of investment. Oil output buckled under the weight of the sanctions, falling from around three million barrels per day at the start of the 2000s to below 400,000 b/d in 2020.The sector recovered some ground after former US president Joe Biden in 2022 eased the sanctions in return for a promise by Maduro to allow fair elections.Biden later reimposed most sanctions when it became clear that Maduro was not keeping his side of the bargain, but allowed Chevron to continue operations.Today, Venezuela produces around 900,000 barrels per day of which Chevron contributes about 220,000, Repsol about 60,000, and Maurel & Prom between 20,000 and 25,000.Washington has given Chevron and the other companies until May 27 to wind up their operations.”PDVSA …now has some operational capacity, although we don’t know how big it is,” Gilberto Morillo, PDVSA’s former financial manager told AFP.- Who will buy it? -Even if PDVSA manages to keep pumping oil, finding a way to monetize it “is another matter,” Morillo said, pointing to the threatened 25-percent US tariffs on countries that buy its crude.In February, Venezuela exported approximately 500,000 barrels per day to China, 240,000 to the United States, and 70,000 to India and Spain. In the past, sanctions forced PDVSA to discount the oil and to find partners to circumvent the sanctions.Caracas also attempted to trade crude oil through a cryptocurrency scheme, which ended with then oil minister Tareck El Aissami being jailed for corruption in a case that cost the country more than $15 billion, according to media reports.- What impact for the economy? -The situation looks set to pile further misery on an economy already in tatters.The price of dollars has soared on the black market as Venezuelans fear falling oil revenue will trigger another bout of hyperinflation and a return to the kind of deep recession the country experienced between 2014 and 2021.The forced pullout of gas producers could also have an impact on the country’s crumbling energy infrastructure, leading to more blackouts.Repsol pointed out that 85 percent of its operations in Venezuela were related to the production of natural gas, which it warned “supports part of the electricity network.”The cancellation of the licenses will prevent PDVSA from using oil to pay the foreign energy companies for gas, as it had been doing, Morillo explained.”If PDVSA can’t pay them, then it generates a debt,” he said.But if the energy firms decide “ok, we’ll close down and leave…they would lose their entire investment,” he argued.

OpenAI on Monday said it raised $40 billion in a new funding round that valued the ChatGPT maker at $300 billion, the biggest capital-raising session ever for a startup.The infusion of cash comes in a partnership with Japanese investment giant SoftBank Group and “enables us to push the frontiers of AI research even further,” the San Francisco-based company said in a post on its website.”Their support will help us continue building AI systems that drive scientific discovery, enable personalized education, enhance human creativity, and pave the way toward AGI (artificial general intelligence) that benefits all of humanity,” the company said.AGI refers to a computing platform with human-level intelligence.SoftBank said in a release that it is on a mission to realize Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) that surpasses human intelligence, and that OpenAI is the partner closest to achieving that goal.”The advancement of OpenAI’s AI models is key to achieving AGI and ASI, and massive computing power is essential,” SoftBank stated in its rationale for the latest investment in the company.SoftBank is to pump $10 billion into OpenAI to start, and $30 billion more by the end of this year pending certain conditions.OpenAI plans to scale its infrastructure and “deliver increasingly powerful tools for the 500 million people who use ChatGPT every week.”- Opening up? -The funding news came the same day OpenAI announced it was building a more open generative AI model as it faces growing competition in the open-source space from Chinese rival DeepSeek, and Meta.The move would mark a strategic shift by OpenAI, which until now has been a fierce defender of closed, proprietary models that do not allow developers to modify the basic technology to make AI more adapted to their goals.OpenAI and defenders of closed models — which include Google — have often decried open models as riskier and more vulnerable to nefarious uses by malicious actors or non-US governments.OpenAI’s embrace of closed models has also been a bone of contention in its battles with former investor Elon Musk, the world’s wealthiest person, who has called on OpenAI to honor the spirit of the company’s name and “return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was.”Putting pressure on OpenAI, many large companies and governments have proved reluctant to build their AI products or services on models they have no control over, especially when data security is a concern.The core selling point of Meta’s family of Llama models or DeepSeek’s models is addressing these worries by letting companies download their models, and have far greater control to modify the technology for their own purposes and keep control of their data.Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said earlier this month that Llama hit one billion downloads, while the release of DeepSeek’s lower-cost R1 model in January rocked the world of artificial intelligence.”We’ve been thinking about this for a long time, but other priorities took precedence. Now it feels important to do,” OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman said on X of the decision to build a more open model.OpenAI has been riding on the success of its latest image-generation features in ChatGPT, the world-leading AI app and chatbot.Altman posted on Monday that the tool helped add “one million users” in one hour.That claim came days after Altman said the new image features were so popular that they were melting the OpenAI graphics processing units that power the AI due to heavy use.

After spending more than nine months stranded in space, two American astronauts confirmed Monday that they’re ready to blast off again aboard a Boeing Starliner, the very spacecraft that could not return them to Earth.In their first NASA press conference since their long-awaited splashdown on March 18, astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams responded to the question of whether they would ride with Boeing again.”Yes, because we’re gonna rectify all the issues that we encountered. We’re gonna fix it. We’re gonna make it work,” said Wilmore.Williams, who co-led the test flight of the Boeing spacecraft agreed, saying “the spacecraft is really capable.””There were a couple things that need to be fixed, like Butch mentioned, and folks are actively working on that, but it’s, it is a great spacecraft, and it has a lot of capability that other spacecraft don’t have,” said Williams.After initial departure aboard the Starliner last June for an eight-day mission, Wilmore and Williams saw their stay on the International Space Station (ISS) extended as a result of malfunctions that were detected on the Boeing spacecraft.The technical problems prompted NASA to entrust the return of their astronauts to Elon Musk’s SpaceX, snubbing Boeing. The SpaceX spaceship returned to Earth safely March 18.”We are all responsible” for the problems encountered during the Starliner’s inaugural manned flight, Wilmore insisted, saying he prefers to look forward.While the stranded astronauts earned a great deal of public interest, the incident also drew political attention with US President Donald Trump accusing his predecessor Joe Biden of deliberately “abandoning” the astronauts, while pledging to rescue them. Without revisiting the political controversy, the astronauts reiterated Monday that they had been prepared for the unexpected delay in their return.”I’m very thankful that people are paying attention,” Williams said. “There’s some lessons learned to it, and part of that is just resilience and being able to take a turn that was unexpected and make the best of it.”