AFP USA

‘Major brain drain’: Researchers eye exit from Trump’s America

In the halls of US universities and research labs, one question has become increasingly common as President Donald Trump tightens his grip on the field: whether to move abroad.”Everybody is talking about it,” JP Flores, a doctoral student in genetics at the University of North Carolina, told AFP.The discussion was thrust into the spotlight after Yale philosophy professor Jason Stanley, a specialist in fascism, announced he was taking a new post in Canada over the Trump administration’s “authoritarian” bent.”I made the decision when Columbia folded,” he told CBS News. “I made it in a split second.”Columbia University, which the Trump administration has threatened with major funding cuts, said it agreed to take steps to rein in pro-Palestinian protests, among other actions.”It is not the time to cower and fear,” said Stanley, who added there was “absolutely no doubt that the United States is an authoritarian country.”With similar threats lodged by Trump against other universities, many researchers are worried about the future of academic freedom in the United States.Coupled with the administration’s broad cuts to federal funding, some fear the country’s research field, once viewed as the envy of the world, may be losing its luster.More than 75 percent of scientists are now considering departing the country over Trump’s policies, according to a survey of over 1,600 people published in late March by the journal Nature.”The trend was particularly pronounced among early-career researchers,” the journal said.- ‘Surreal’ – “People are just so scared,” Daniella Fodera, a Columbia PhD student whose research grant was cancelled, told AFP.Amid the uncertainty, several academic institutions in recent weeks have announced a hiring freeze and a reduction in the number of graduate student positions.”That’s definitely messing up the academic pipeline,” said Fodera, a biomechanics student.Karen Sfanos, head of a research lab at Johns Hopkins University, said: “It’s kind of a surreal time for scientists because we just don’t know what’s going to happen with funding.””There’s not a lot of clarity, and things are changing day by day,” she said, noting it is hitting the “youngest generation” relatively hard.Fodera, who studies uterine fibroids — benign tumors affecting many women — said she has begun to “actively look at positions in Europe and abroad for continuing my post-doctoral training.”- ‘Generational loss’ -With mounting concerns among US researchers, several European and Canadian universities have launched initiatives to attract some of the talent, though they may not need to try too hard.”I know researchers already that have dual citizenship, or who have family in Canada, in France, in Germany, are saying, ‘I think I’m going to go live in Germany for the next, you know, five years and do research there,'” said Gwen Nichols.The physician, a senior leader at a blood cancer research group, warned the possible exodus could make the United States “lose our dominance as the biopharmaceutical innovation leader of the world.””We’ll see the problem 10 years from now, when we don’t have the innovation we need,” she added.Genetics researcher Flores agreed, saying “it has become quite clear that there’s gonna be a major brain drain here in American research.”One young climate researcher, who requested to remain anonymous, said she had started the process of attaining EU citizenship and that colleagues in Europe “have all been extremely sympathetic to the situation.”But she noted that those with limited resources, like many recent graduates, would be the least likely to be taken on by European institutions and may decide to drop out of science altogether.”This is a generational loss for science across all disciplines,” she warned.

US Supreme Court lifts order barring deportations using wartime law

The US Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a victory on Monday by lifting a lower court order barring the deportation of undocumented Venezuelan migrants using an obscure wartime law.But the nation’s top court also said that migrants subject to deportation under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act must be given an opportunity to legally challenge their removal.The 5-4 decision by the conservative-dominated Supreme Court will allow the Trump administration to resume deportations for now that had been blocked by a federal district court judge.Trump invoked the AEA, which has only previously been used during wartime, to round up alleged Venezuelan gang members and summarily deport them to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador.Attorneys for several of the deported Venezuelans have said that their clients were not members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, had committed no crimes and were targeted largely on the basis of their tattoos.The Republican president, who campaigned on a pledge to expel millions of undocumented migrants, welcomed the top court’s ruling in a post on Truth Social.”The Supreme Court has upheld the Rule of Law in our Nation by allowing a President, whoever that may be, to be able to secure our Borders, and protect our families and our Country, itself,” Trump said. “A GREAT DAY FOR JUSTICE IN AMERICA!”District Judge James Boasberg issued temporary restraining orders barring further flights of deportees under the AEA after planeloads of Venezuelan migrants were sent to El Salvador on March 15.The Supreme Court lifted Boasberg’s orders but mostly on technical grounds related to venue — that the group of Venezuelan migrants who sued to prevent their removal are in Texas while the case before Boasberg was brought in Washington.”The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia,” the justices said, leaving the door open to possible further challenges to the legality of using the AEA to be heard in lower courts.- ‘Important victory’ -At the same time, the Supreme Court made it clear that migrants subject to deportation under the AEA, which has only been used during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II, are entitled to some form of due process.”AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act,” the court said.”Detainees subject to removal orders under the AEA are entitled to notice and an opportunity to challenge their removal,” it said. “The only question is which court will resolve that challenge.”Lee Gelernt, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which filed suit against the deportations, said the Supreme Court’s ruling that deportees were entitled to due process was an “important victory.”Chief Justice John Roberts and four other conservative justices voted to lift the district court order’s temporarily barring the deportations using the AEA while the three liberal justices and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a Trump appointee, dissented.”The President of the United States has invoked a centuries-old wartime statute to whisk people away to a notoriously brutal, foreign-run prison,” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said. “For lovers of liberty, this should be quite concerning.”Justice Sonia Sotomayor, another liberal, said “the Government’s conduct in this litigation poses an extraordinary threat to the rule of law. We, as a Nation and a court of law, should be better than this.”The Trump administration has used images of the alleged Tren de Aragua gang members being shackled and having their heads shaved in the Central American prison as proof that it is serious about cracking down on illegal immigration.

The scholar who helped Bad Bunny deal a Puerto Rican history lesson

It was Christmas Eve when multiple new Instagram followers slid into Jorell Melendez-Badillo’s DMs, all with the same question: would the historian be interested in collaborating with Bad Bunny?”My heart dropped,” he told AFP. “I immediately said yes.”Bad Bunny, one of the globe’s biggest stars, was preparing to release his sixth studio album, “Debi Tirar Mas Fotos” — “I Should’ve Taken More Photos” — a love letter to his home Puerto Rico.And the reggaeton artist born Benito Martinez Ocasio wanted Melendez-Badillo — who had recently published the book “Puerto Rico: A National History,” a study of the island’s colonial history and its political movements — to consult on the visualizers the megastar would release with his new tracks.The release date was January 5 — less than two weeks after Melendez-Badillo was brought in.”I had promised my partner, my kid, my therapist, that I was going to leave my computer behind,” he laughed, saying at the time they were vacationing in Portugal. But when Bad Bunny calls, you answer.Melendez-Badillo said he first spoke with a producer who explained the album’s concept: an affirmation of Puerto Rican identity and culture in relation to continued colonialism and displacement (The Caribbean archipelago has been a US territory since 1898, following centuries of Spanish colonial rule.)The project “centers marginalized people,” Melendez-Badillo said. “Benito was really interested in, for example, highlighting the history of surveillance and repression in Puerto Rico.”The University of Wisconsin-Madison professor wrote 74 pages of notes by hand, eventually typing them up and turning them in by New Year’s Day, having communicated with Bad Bunny over voice notes transmitted by associates of the artist.The slides accompanying Bad Bunny’s infectious, wildly popular new songs that feature salsa and percussive plena are power-point style and text-heavy, but still an accessible crash course.To date, the visualizer for the smash lead single “Nuevayol” has received some 58 million views — it’s centered on the creation of the first Puerto Rican flag — and there are 16 more visualizers beyond that, with views on sites like YouTube totaling in the hundreds of millions.”As academics, your books are only read by your students,” he laughed. “A few colleagues write reviews.”And while he aims to “bring history out of the ivory tower,” Melendez-Badillo said “never in my life did I think it was going to be at this magnitude.”- ‘Complexity of Puerto Ricanness’ -Melendez-Badillo said he’s received snapshots from clubs where his visualizers are projected: “They’re drinking and dancing, and there’s like, freaking history in the background. It’s surreal.”It’s also a vital teaching tool, the professor said.Bad Bunny’s album has highlighted how little Puerto Rican history is taught in the island’s public schools, many of which have shuttered in recent years in the wake of a crippling debt crisis and devastating hurricanes.His visualizers are Spanish only: they’re educational for anyone, but ultimately, they speak to Puerto Ricans.”He was interested in these histories being read by people in the projects and the working class neighborhoods,” Melendez-Badillo said.Bad Bunny’s no stranger to politics: he’s been a vocal participant in Puerto Rican elections and movements.The artist also weighed in this past US presidential election, supporting Democrat Kamala Harris after a speaker at a Donald Trump rally disparaged his homeland.Bad Bunny has made multiple short films that illuminate issues in Puerto Rico including endemic power outages, tax laws benefiting foreigners, and displacement, both physical and cultural.”We’ve seen Benito grow in the spotlight,” the professor said. “He is more aware of being a political subject and of using his platform to amplify those conversations.”The history lessons in “Debi Tirar Mas Fotos” extend to its celebration of traditional Puerto Rican sounds and rhythms.And it’s brought positive visibility to a place too often viewed through a lens of suffering in moments of disaster.Those media cycles rarely “allow for Puerto Ricans to speak for themselves,” Melendez-Badillo said. “It reproduces these very problematic colonial tropes.”With the new album, Bad Bunny flips that narrative.”It’s forcing people to reckon with the complexity of Puerto Ricanness” with nuance, Melendez-Badillo said.And, crucially, it’s eminently danceable, he added with a smile: “The perreo songs are my favorite.”

Trump to undergo annual physical this week

US President Donald Trump said Monday that he will undergo his “long scheduled Annual Physical Examination” on Friday at a military hospital near Washington. “I have never felt better, but nevertheless, these things must be done!” he wrote in a post on Truth Social.Trump, 78, is a prolific golfer who abstains from alcohol and cigarettes, but he is known to indulge in fast food and famously enjoys his steaks well-done.His earlier physical exams at Walter Reed Medical Center raised questions about the specifics of his health data and about the transparency of results.A physical during his first term, in 2018, suggested the president should aim to lose 10 to 15 pounds but was generally in “excellent health.” His doctor said there were no signs of “any cognitive issues,” and that with a healthier diet, he could “live to be 200 years old.”A year later, an exam found the 6-foot-3 (1.9 meter) Trump weighed 243 pounds (110 kilograms), up seven pounds since shortly before taking office, making him technically obese. It said he was taking medication to treat high cholesterol.In 2020, he told Fox News that he aced a test for cognitive impairment by repeating the phrase “person, woman, man, camera, TV.”  During Trump’s presidential campaign in 2015, his doctor, Harold Bornstein, released a letter saying the candidate’s blood pressure was “astonishingly excellent” and that if elected, “Mr. Trump, I can state unequivocally, will be the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency.”Bornstein later told CNN that Trump himself “dictated that whole letter. I didn’t write that letter.”

‘Taxi Driver’ writer accused of sexual harassment and assault

The writer behind Robert De Niro classics “Raging Bull” and “Taxi Driver” is being sued by his former assistant for sexual harassment and assault.Paul Schrader has been accused by the unnamed 26-year-old of grabbing and kissing her while they were at the Cannes Film Festival last year.A lawsuit filed in New York last week says after she escaped his clutches, the woman — given the pseudonym Jane Doe in the suit — was summoned to his hotel room three days later where Schrader exposed himself.”Since Defendant Schrader’s brutal attack on Ms. Doe, exposure of his genitals to her, and his countless other acts of sexual harassment, she has suffered, inter alia, nightmares, extreme anxiety, and trauma, and has withdrawn almost completely from her former life,” the suit says.The legal filing claims Schrader, 78, fired his assistant in September.”Two days later, in full acknowledgment of his unlawful and predatory behavior, he wrote in an email to her…’If I have become a Harvey Weinstein in your mind then of course you have no choice but to put me in the rear view mirror,'” the lawsuit says.Weinstein, 73, was the Hollywood power player whose decades-long sexual predation sparked the “Me Too” movement, leading to convictions that are under appeal. The former Miramax co-founder is serving a 16-year prison sentence in California after rape convictions in New York were overturned in 2024.Jane Doe’s suit says Schrader initially agreed to an undisclosed financial settlement over the allegations, but later backed out.The motion seeks to enforce the terms of the agreement and demands reimbursement for legal fees and costs.Schrader’s lawyer, Philip Kessler, told AFP on Monday that they would contest the lawsuit.He said Schrader had not signed an agreement, which meant it was null and void.”He reflected on paying as much money as the agreement required him to pay, had he signed it, and he reached the conclusion that it was not in his interest to do that,” Kessler said.Kessler said the underlying harassment allegations “are seriously inaccurate, very misleading and fundamentally untrue.””He kissed her twice in almost three and a half years and… it was only at the time of the second kiss that she indicated displeasure, and he never attempted to kiss her again,” Kessler added.”He will also say that he never attempted to have sex with her, and he will also say that he never exposed himself to her.”Schrader was in Cannes to promote his film “Oh, Canada,” starring Richard Gere, Uma Thurman and Jacob Elordi.AFP has reached out to Cannes organizers for comment.

JPMorgan Chase CEO warns tariffs will slow growth

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned Monday that US President Donald Trump’s tariffs will likely lift inflation, describing himself as “very cautious” in light of the rising recession risk.”Whether or not the menu of tariffs causes a recession remains in question, but it will slow down growth,” Dimon said in his annual letter to shareholders.Dimon, an influential figure in markets as the longest serving CEO of a major Wall Street firm, said the US economy had been steady “for years” but was “already weakening” even before Trump’s watershed tariff announcement last Wednesday.”There are many uncertainties surrounding the new tariff policy: the potential retaliatory actions, including on services, by other countries, the effect on confidence, the impact on investments and capital flows, the effect on corporate profits and the possible effect on the US dollar,” Dimon wrote.”In the short run, I see this as one large additional straw on the camel’s back,” said Dimon, adding “my most serious concern is how this will affect America’s long-term economic alliances.”JPMorgan analysts published a note Friday expecting US GDP to contract this year “under the weight of the tariffs.” They also recently raised their risk of global recession to 60 percent.Separately, Goldman Sachs said Sunday that if most of Trump’s April 9 tariffs take effect, these charges — alongside likely sectoral duties — could tip their forecast to a recession.US and global equities have been in free fall since Trump announced sweeping tariffs last week in a move the president touted as “Liberation Day” from international trade rules he argues have harmed the country.Dimon described Trump’s tariffs as one of several factors that could boost inflation, along with continued high fiscal deficits, “the remilitarization of the world” and major investments supporting infrastructure and the green economy.”While inflation has come down, most of what I see in the future is inflationary,” said Dimon, who backs the need for reducing the US deficit.”These large deficits are not sustainable –- I do not know whether it will cause a real problem in six months or six years –- the sooner we deal with it, the better,” Dimon said.

Trump vows no tariff pause as markets dive

US President Donald Trump on Monday threatened fresh tariffs of 50 percent on China and ruled out any pause in his aggressive new global trade policy, despite a dramatic market sell-off.Trump upended the world economy last week with sweeping tariffs that have raised fears of an international recession and triggered criticism even from within his own Republican Party.As the trade war escalates, Beijing — Washington’s major economic rival — unveiled its own 34 percent duties on US goods to come into effect on Thursday.The US president chastised China for ignoring his warning that targeted countries should not to retaliate.He said that if Beijing did not immediately back down the United States would impose additional 50 percent tariffs on China from Friday.”I have great respect for China but they can not do this,” Trump said in the White House. “We are going to have one shot at this… I’ll tell you what, it is an honor to do it.”With the incoming 34 percent rate and new 50 percent threat, the total extra tariffs on China this year could rise to 104 percent, the White House told AFP.- China responds -Beijing hit back, saying in a statement from its US embassy that “pressuring or threatening China is not a right way to engage.”Stock markets and oil prices collapsed further, as trading floors across the world endured waves of selling after last week’s sharp losses.Wall Street stocks finished lower following a volatile session, with both the Dow and S&P 500 ending down.But Hong Kong collapsed by 13.2 percent Monday, its worst day in nearly three decades.Trillions of dollars have been wiped off combined stock market valuations in recent sessions. Tokyo closed down by almost eight percent. Frankfurt fell as much as 10 percent in early trading before paring back losses.Trump doubled down again on Monday, saying he was “not looking” at any pause in tariff implementation.He also scrapped any meetings with China over tariffs, but said the United States was ready for talks with any country willing to negotiate.”There can be permanent tariffs, and there can also be negotiations, because there are things that we need beyond tariffs,” Trump said while meeting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the first leader to lobby him in person over the levies.A 10 percent “baseline” tariff on US imports from around the world took effect Saturday, and a slew of countries will be hit by higher duties from Wednesday, including the levy of 34 percent for Chinese goods as well as 20 percent for EU products.Scores of countries have sought talks, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News, adding “through good negotiations, all we will do is see levels come down.”EU trade ministers were in Luxembourg on Monday to discuss the bloc’s response, with Germany and France having advocated a tax targeting US tech giants.”We must not exclude any option on goods, on services,” said French Trade Minister Laurent Saint-Martin.The 27-nation bloc should “open the European toolbox, which is very comprehensive and can also be extremely aggressive,” he said.But signs of divergence emerged from Ireland, whose low corporate tax rate has attracted US tech and pharmaceutical companies.Targeting services “would be an extraordinary escalation,” said Irish Trade Minister Simon Harris.- Inflation? Recession? -Bitcoin tumbled, while the dollar rebounded after sharp losses last week.”Don’t be Weak! Don’t be Stupid!” Trump urged Americans minutes before Wall Street opened. “Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!”The 78-year-old Republican believes that the tariffs will revive America’s lost manufacturing base by forcing foreign companies to relocate to the United States, rather than making goods abroad.But most economists question his theory and say his tariffs are arbitrary.JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned of coming inflation, adding “whether or not the menu of tariffs causes a recession remains in question, but it will slow down growth.”US Senator Ted Cruz — a staunch Trump loyalist — expressed widespread concern among Republican lawmakers over the impact on ordinary voters.He warned of a jobs crunch and rising prices, saying a recession would mean a “bloodbath” for Republicans in mid-term elections next year.

Stocks sink again as Trump holds firm on tariffs

Stock markets and oil prices slumped further on a black Monday for markets as US President Donald Trump stood firm over his tariffs despite recession fears.Trading floors across the globe experienced waves of further selling after last week’s sharp losses, with Trump telling Americans to “be strong, courageous, and patient,” minutes before the New York stock market opened to drops of over three percent.Both the Dow and S&P 500 finished volatile sessions lower while the Nasdaq mustered a modest gain.Much worse hit was Hong Kong, which collapsed by 13.2 percent in its worst day in nearly three decades.Trillions of dollars have been wiped off combined stock market valuations in recent sessions. Taipei stocks suffered their worst fall on record Monday, tanking 9.7 percent. Tokyo closed down by almost eight percent. Frankfurt fell as much as 10 percent in early trading before paring back losses to end the day down 4.1 percent.”The carnage in global equity markets has continued,” said Thomas Mathews, Asia Pacific head of markets at Capital Economics.A 10 percent “baseline” tariff on imports from around the world took effect Saturday.A slew of countries will be hit by higher duties from Wednesday, with levies of 34 percent for Chinese goods and 20 percent for EU products.Beijing last week announced its own 34 percent tariff on US goods, which will come into effect on Thursday.Trump on Monday threatened to slap an additional 50 percent tariff on China if Beijing did not withdraw its retaliation plans — heightening the prospect of another round of tit-for-tat hikes.Major US indices briefly surged into positive territory following a report that White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said Trump was considering a 90-day tariff pause.But markets retreated when the White House denied the story posting Hassett’s interview on Fox News that had been misquoted.- Bitter medicine -Hopes that the US president would rethink his policy in light of the turmoil were dashed on Sunday when he said he would not make a deal with other countries unless trade deficits were solved.”Sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something,” he said of the market pain that has wiped trillions of dollars off company valuations, which impacts the retirement savings of many Americans.In a letter to shareholders, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon warned that Trump’s broad tariffs “will likely increase inflation.””Whether or not the menu of tariffs causes a recession remains in question, but it will slow down growth,” Dimon said, concluding that “the recent tariffs will likely increase inflation.”With the start of the first quarter earnings reports, the market is likely to get a flurry of updated outlooks by companies that could further dampen sentiment.Concerns about future energy demand saw oil prices slide more than two percent, having dropped some seven percent Friday. Both main contracts hit their lowest levels since 2021, but then cut losses.- Key figures around 2050 GMT -New York – Dow: DOWN 0.9 percent at 37,965.60 (close)New York – S&P 500: DOWN 0.2 percent at 5,062.25 (close)New York – Nasdaq Composite: UP 0.1 percent at 15,603.26 (close)London – FTSE 100: DOWN 4.4 percent at 7,702.08 (close)Paris – CAC 40: DOWN 4.8 percent at 6,927.12 (close)Frankfurt – DAX: DOWN 4.1 percent at 19,789.02 (close)Tokyo – Nikkei 225: DOWN 7.8 percent at 31,136.58 (close)Hong Kong – Hang Seng Index: DOWN 13.2 percent at 19,828.30 (close)Shanghai – Composite: DOWN 7.3 percent at 3,096.58 (close)West Texas Intermediate: DOWN 2.1 percent at $60.70 per barrelBrent North Sea Crude: DOWN 2.1 percent at $64.21 per barrelEuro/dollar: DOWN at $1.0904 from $1.0956 on FridayPound/dollar: DOWN at $1.2723 from $1.2887Dollar/yen: UP at 147.83 yen from 146.93 yen Euro/pound: UP at 85.68 pence from 85.01 penceburs-jmb/bjt

US ‘turns a blind eye’, says American-Palestinian after son killed by Israel

American-Palestinian Muhammad Rabee feels abandoned by the United States, he told AFP on Monday, a day after Israeli forces killed his 14-year-old son during a family visit in the occupied West Bank.Rabee’s family live in New Jersey, and like the vast majority of Palestinians from the West Bank town of Turmus Ayya, are dual citizens, but the father said Washington “turns a blind eye” to soaring Israeli attacks and abuses against them.The sorrow on his face showing even from behind his large sunglasses, Rabee carried the body of his son Amer, shrouded in a Palestinian flag, through the streets of Turmus Ayya as dozens of residents came out to pay their final respects.An AFP correspondent said some were waving flags and chanting slogans as the funeral procession made its war from the local morgue to a mosque, and finally on to the cemetery.After the shooting that killed his son and wounded two other teenagers in Turmus Ayya, near a main road through the West Bank, Rabee said he has a message to US President Donald Trump.Trump must “stop this situation, stop sending weapons” to Israel that are then used “to kill his people”, Rabee said, meaning American citizens like him.The mayor of Turmus Ayya, Lafi Shalabi, told AFP that the three boys were hit with live fire as they were picking green almonds.One of the two wounded, who are both 14, is also a US citizen, he said.But Israel’s military said they were “terrorists” who hurled rocks on cars travelling on the road.The military released a black-and-white video showing three individuals, one of whom appears to throw an indiscernible item.Rabee said that the “video is not accurate” and does not prove that his son had thrown rocks.”There were six bullets in his body, two in his heart, two in his shoulder, and two in his face,” said the father.- ‘Forgotten citizens’ -Rabee said that in past cases of attacks around Turmus Ayya, the US embassy has usually accepted the Israeli version of events, despite evidence showing violence from Israeli settlers under army protection, “assaults, killings, arson, and theft of Palestinian land”.”All of these things — the US embassy turns a blind eye to them”, he said.Some residents share his view.Majdi Arif, a retired teacher who lived in New Jersey for two decades, said their concerns often go unanswered.”Usually, the US embassy does nothing,” or reports cases to the Israeli government, “which is useless to us”, he told AFP.Turmus Ayya is located near the Israeli settlement of Shilo, whose residents according to Shalabi have been involved in attacks on Turmus Ayya.The Palestinian health ministry as well as mayor Shalabi said an Israeli settler was present with the soldiers at the time of the shooting.Yaser Alkam, head of Turmus Ayya’s foreign relations department, said that “Palestinian-Americans in Turmus Ayya are simply disappointed… we are the forgotten citizens” of the United States.”We’ve reached out to the US embassy many, many times”, he said, to no avail.The US State Department told AFP it offers its “sincerest condolences to the family on their loss.””We acknowledge the IDF initial statement that expressed that this incident occurred during a counter-terrorism operation and that Israel is investigating,” it said, adding that out of “respect for the privacy of the family” it had no further comment.- Palestinians ‘targeted’ -“Turmus Ayya is made up of 80 percent Americans,” said Alkam.”When an Israeli soldier shoots at… young children, there is an 80 percent chance he’s hitting an American.”Alkam, who lived for 25 years in California, denounced daily Israeli army incursions into the town “for no reason” that often escalate rapidly and prove fatal for Palestinians, including children regularly shot for hurling rocks.He warned that with Trump’s “unconditional support” for the Israeli government, there will be even “more violence with impunity” against Palestinians.Violence has surged since the October 2023 start of the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip, a separate Palestinian territory.At least 918 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli troops or settlers in the West Bank since then, according to Palestinian health ministry figures.”Whether it’s the Israeli army, settlers, or police — the entire Palestinian people are being targeted”, said Shalabi.

US Supreme Court pauses order for return of Salvadoran deported in error

The US Supreme Court on Monday paused a lower court order demanding that the Trump administration repatriate a Salvadoran migrant who was wrongfully deported last month.Kilmar Abrego Garcia, 29, who was living in the eastern state of Maryland, was among more than 200 people sent to a notorious prison in El Salvador last month as part of Republican President Donald Trump’s crackdown on undocumented migrants.US District Judge Paula Xinis ordered Friday that Abrego Garcia be returned to the United States by 11:59 pm on Monday after Justice Department lawyers admitted he was deported due to an “administrative error.”A federal appeals court unanimously upheld the decision with Judge Harvie Wilkinson, an appointee of former Republican president Ronald Reagan, writing: “There is no question that the government screwed up here.”The facts of this case thus present the potential for a disturbing loophole: namely that the government could whisk individuals to foreign prisons in violation of court orders and then contend… it is no longer their custodian, and there is nothing that can be done,” he said.”It takes no small amount of imagination to understand that this is a path of perfect lawlessness, one that courts cannot condone,” Wilkinson said.The Trump administration appealed to the conservative-dominated Supreme Court, which issued a stay of the district judge’s repatriation order pending further consideration of the case.Chief Justice John Roberts asked attorneys for Abrego Garcia to submit arguments by 5:00 pm (2100 GMT) on Tuesday.The Trump administration, in asking the Supreme Court to overturn the lower court’s order, called it “unprecedented and indefensible” and a “demand that the United States let a member of a foreign terrorist organization into America tonight.”The White House has insisted that Abrego Garcia, who is married to a US citizen, is a member of the Salvadoran gang MS-13 — though Judge Xinis dismissed this claim as lacking evidence.- Alien Enemies Act -Abrego Garcia had been living in the United States under protected legal status since 2019, when a judge ruled he should not be deported because he could be harmed in El Salvador.The Trump administration conceded again in its Supreme Court application that Abrego Garcia’s deportation to El Salvador was an error, but added he could still be removed “anywhere else in the world.”Three planeloads of undocumented migrants were flown from the United States to El Salvador on March 15.The Trump administration has alleged that most of the deportees belonged to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, but some attorneys have said their clients were not gang members, had committed no crimes and were targeted largely because of their tattoos.Trump invoked the little-known 1798 Alien Enemies Act to justify their summary removal.Another district judge, James Boasberg, has barred the Trump administration from carrying out further deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, which has only been used previously during the War of 1812, World War I and World War II.The Trump administration has appealed Boasberg’s order to the Supreme Court, asking it to allow deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act to resume.In its appeal to the Supreme Court, which includes three justices nominated by Trump, acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris said the case is a key test of presidential authority over the courts.”This case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country” — the president or judges, Harris said. “The Constitution supplies a clear answer: the President.”